The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Bisphosphonates to reduce bone fractures in stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Bisphosphonates to reduce bone fractures in stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-matched cohort study
Bisphosphonates to reduce bone fractures in stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-matched cohort study
Background: Bisphosphonates are contraindicated in patients with stage 4+ chronic kidney disease. However, they are widely used to prevent fragility fractures in stage 3 chronic kidney disease, despite a lack of good-quality data on their effects. Objectives: The aims of each work package were as follows. Work package 1: to study the relationship between bisphosphonate use and chronic kidney disease progression. Work package 2: to study the association between using bisphosphonates and fracture risk. Work package 3: to determine the risks of hypocalcaemia, hypophosphataemia, acute kidney injury and upper gastrointestinal events associated with using bisphosphonates. Work package 4: to investigate the association between using bisphosphonates and changes in bone mineral density over time. Design: This was a new-user cohort study design with propensity score matching. Setting and data sources: Data were obtained from UK NHS primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database) and linked hospital inpatient records (Hospital Episode Statistics) for work packages 1-3 and from the Danish Odense University Hospital Databases for work package 4. Participants: Patients registered in the data sources who had at least one measurement of estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 45 ml/minute/1.73 m2 were eligible. A second estimated glomerular filtration rate value of < 45 ml/minute/1.73 m2 within 1 year after the first was requested for work packages 1 and 3. Patients with no Hospital Episode Statistics linkage were excluded from work packages 1-3. Patients with < 1 year of run-in data before index estimated glomerular filtration rate and previous users of anti-osteoporosis medications were excluded from work packages 1-4. Interventions/exposure: Bisphosphonate use, identified from primary care prescriptions (for work packages 1-3) or pharmacy dispensations (for work package 4), was the main exposure. Main outcome measures: Work package 1: chronic kidney disease progression, defined as stage worsening or starting renal replacement. Work package 2: hip fracture. Work package 3: acute kidney injury, hypocalcaemia and hypophosphataemia identified from Hospital Episode Statistics, and gastrointestinal events identified from Clinical Practice Research Datalink or Hospital Episode Statistics. Work package 4: annualised femoral neck bone mineral density percentage change. Results: Bisphosphonate use was associated with an excess risk of chronic kidney disease progression (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.24) in work package 1, but did not increase the probability of other safety outcomes in work package 3. The results from work package 2 suggested that bisphosphonate use increased fracture risk (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.39) for hip fractures, but sensitivity analyses suggested that this was related to unresolved confounding. Conversely, work package 4 suggested that bisphosphonates improved bone mineral density, with an average 2.65% (95% confidence interval 1.32% to 3.99%) greater gain in femoral neck bone mineral density per year in bisphosphonate users than in matched non-users. Limitations: Confounding by indication was a concern for the clinical effectiveness (i.e. work package 2) data. Bias analyses suggested that these findings were due to inappropriate adjustment for pre-treatment risk. work packages 3 and 4 were based on small numbers of events and participants, respectively. Conclusions: Bisphosphonates were associated with a 12% excess risk of chronic kidney disease progression in participants with stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease. No other safety concerns were identified. Bisphosphonate therapy increased bone mineral density, but the research team failed to demonstrate antifracture effectiveness.
1366-5278
1-105
Robinson, Danielle E.
14bc241a-fdd7-44f9-96df-323cb9e82dff
Ali, M. Sanni
e67adee2-2c0d-4437-970b-1bacab9ec0f0
Strauss, Victoria Y.
7f805b15-394f-4a91-8dde-eb3cbae3036a
Elhussein, Leena
17ff3968-566d-405d-bd32-2b849d455de5
Abrahamsen, B.
fee8b1eb-c267-4d2a-952a-d1b9f20d0125
Arden, Nigel K.
23af958d-835c-4d79-be54-4bbe4c68077f
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
df80bd02-a908-4296-b293-825d42203729
Caskey, Fergus
5f576f0a-f2da-473d-82fe-a2b684b9fb29
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Dedman, Daniel
62e6508c-d72e-4f77-9145-7889773af6d4
Delmestri, A.
c1dfbd4f-1ec0-4e02-a6fa-423f90edc322
Judge, Andrew
53ccba98-13f0-4a06-b2ff-59a35616c990
Kassim Javaid, M.
12781b29-34fa-4158-837b-daf452b8d4ed
Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
e596722a-2f01-4201-bd9d-be3e180e76a9
Robinson, Danielle E.
14bc241a-fdd7-44f9-96df-323cb9e82dff
Ali, M. Sanni
e67adee2-2c0d-4437-970b-1bacab9ec0f0
Strauss, Victoria Y.
7f805b15-394f-4a91-8dde-eb3cbae3036a
Elhussein, Leena
17ff3968-566d-405d-bd32-2b849d455de5
Abrahamsen, B.
fee8b1eb-c267-4d2a-952a-d1b9f20d0125
Arden, Nigel K.
23af958d-835c-4d79-be54-4bbe4c68077f
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
df80bd02-a908-4296-b293-825d42203729
Caskey, Fergus
5f576f0a-f2da-473d-82fe-a2b684b9fb29
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Dedman, Daniel
62e6508c-d72e-4f77-9145-7889773af6d4
Delmestri, A.
c1dfbd4f-1ec0-4e02-a6fa-423f90edc322
Judge, Andrew
53ccba98-13f0-4a06-b2ff-59a35616c990
Kassim Javaid, M.
12781b29-34fa-4158-837b-daf452b8d4ed
Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
e596722a-2f01-4201-bd9d-be3e180e76a9

Robinson, Danielle E., Ali, M. Sanni, Strauss, Victoria Y., Elhussein, Leena, Abrahamsen, B., Arden, Nigel K., Ben-Shlomo, Yoav, Caskey, Fergus, Cooper, Cyrus, Dedman, Daniel, Delmestri, A., Judge, Andrew, Kassim Javaid, M. and Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel (2021) Bisphosphonates to reduce bone fractures in stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Health Technology Assessment, 25 (17), 1-105. (doi:10.3310/hta25170).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Bisphosphonates are contraindicated in patients with stage 4+ chronic kidney disease. However, they are widely used to prevent fragility fractures in stage 3 chronic kidney disease, despite a lack of good-quality data on their effects. Objectives: The aims of each work package were as follows. Work package 1: to study the relationship between bisphosphonate use and chronic kidney disease progression. Work package 2: to study the association between using bisphosphonates and fracture risk. Work package 3: to determine the risks of hypocalcaemia, hypophosphataemia, acute kidney injury and upper gastrointestinal events associated with using bisphosphonates. Work package 4: to investigate the association between using bisphosphonates and changes in bone mineral density over time. Design: This was a new-user cohort study design with propensity score matching. Setting and data sources: Data were obtained from UK NHS primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database) and linked hospital inpatient records (Hospital Episode Statistics) for work packages 1-3 and from the Danish Odense University Hospital Databases for work package 4. Participants: Patients registered in the data sources who had at least one measurement of estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 45 ml/minute/1.73 m2 were eligible. A second estimated glomerular filtration rate value of < 45 ml/minute/1.73 m2 within 1 year after the first was requested for work packages 1 and 3. Patients with no Hospital Episode Statistics linkage were excluded from work packages 1-3. Patients with < 1 year of run-in data before index estimated glomerular filtration rate and previous users of anti-osteoporosis medications were excluded from work packages 1-4. Interventions/exposure: Bisphosphonate use, identified from primary care prescriptions (for work packages 1-3) or pharmacy dispensations (for work package 4), was the main exposure. Main outcome measures: Work package 1: chronic kidney disease progression, defined as stage worsening or starting renal replacement. Work package 2: hip fracture. Work package 3: acute kidney injury, hypocalcaemia and hypophosphataemia identified from Hospital Episode Statistics, and gastrointestinal events identified from Clinical Practice Research Datalink or Hospital Episode Statistics. Work package 4: annualised femoral neck bone mineral density percentage change. Results: Bisphosphonate use was associated with an excess risk of chronic kidney disease progression (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.24) in work package 1, but did not increase the probability of other safety outcomes in work package 3. The results from work package 2 suggested that bisphosphonate use increased fracture risk (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.39) for hip fractures, but sensitivity analyses suggested that this was related to unresolved confounding. Conversely, work package 4 suggested that bisphosphonates improved bone mineral density, with an average 2.65% (95% confidence interval 1.32% to 3.99%) greater gain in femoral neck bone mineral density per year in bisphosphonate users than in matched non-users. Limitations: Confounding by indication was a concern for the clinical effectiveness (i.e. work package 2) data. Bias analyses suggested that these findings were due to inappropriate adjustment for pre-treatment risk. work packages 3 and 4 were based on small numbers of events and participants, respectively. Conclusions: Bisphosphonates were associated with a 12% excess risk of chronic kidney disease progression in participants with stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease. No other safety concerns were identified. Bisphosphonate therapy increased bone mineral density, but the research team failed to demonstrate antifracture effectiveness.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 March 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 17. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The project was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford. Funding Information: The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 14/36/02. The contractual start date was in December 2015. The draft report began editorial review in October 2018 and was accepted for publication in March 2019. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report. Funding Information: Declared competing interests of authors: Bo Abrahamsen reports research grants from Union Chimique Belge (UCB S.A. Brussels, Belgium) and Novartis International AG (Basel, Switzerland). Nigel K Arden reports personal fees from Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. (Burlington, MA, USA), Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP (London, UK), Janssen Pharmaceutica (Beerse, Belgium), Merck Group (Darmstadt, Germany) and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Eastview, NY, USA). Cyrus Cooper reports personal fees from the Alliance for Better Bone Health Amgen (Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA), Eli Lilly and Company (Indianapolis, IN, USA), GlaxoSmithKline plc (London, UK), Medtronic plc (Dublin, Ireland), Merck, Novartis, Pfizer Inc. (New York City, NY, USA), F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (Basel, Switzerland), Servier Laboratories (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France), Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) and UCB. Andrew Judge is a subpanel member of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research panel, has received consultancy fees from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and has held advisory board positions (which involved receipt of fees) at Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Hayward, CA, USA). M Kassim Javaid reports research support and speaker fees from Amgen. Daniel Prieto-Alhambra reports research grants from UCB, Amgen and Servier Laboratories, and departmental (not personal) speaker and consultancy fees from UCB and Amgen. He has also been a member of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Clinical Evaluation and Trials panel since November 2017. Funding Information: This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HTA programme or the Department of Health and Social Care. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HTA programme or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding Information: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 17. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The project was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford. This study was approved by the ISAC (protocol number 15_ 53R2A). It was based, in part, on data from CPRD obtained under licence from the UK MHRA. The data were provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support. The interpretation and conclusions contained in this study are those of the authors alone. Publisher Copyright: © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2021.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 448346
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/448346
ISSN: 1366-5278
PURE UUID: bfa74352-d102-45e8-9699-e57e024f59d0
ORCID for Cyrus Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Apr 2021 16:34
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Danielle E. Robinson
Author: M. Sanni Ali
Author: Victoria Y. Strauss
Author: Leena Elhussein
Author: B. Abrahamsen
Author: Nigel K. Arden
Author: Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Author: Fergus Caskey
Author: Cyrus Cooper ORCID iD
Author: Daniel Dedman
Author: A. Delmestri
Author: Andrew Judge
Author: M. Kassim Javaid
Author: Daniel Prieto-Alhambra

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×