The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space

Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space
Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space
1. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) encompass a range of social, cultural and health benefits to local communities, for example recreation, spirituality, a sense of place and local identity. However, these complex and place-specific CES are often overlooked in rapid land management decisions and assessed using broad, top–down approaches. 2. We use the Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to examine a novel approach to rapid assessment of local CES provision using inductive, participatory methods. We combined free-listing and participatory geographic information systems (GIS) techniques to quantify and map perceptions of current CES provision of an urban green space. The results were then statistically compared with those of a proposed alternative scenario with the aim to inform future decision-making. 3. By identifying changes in the spatial hotspots of CES in our study area, we revealed a spatially-specific shift toward positive sentiment regarding several CES under the alternative state with variance across demographic and stakeholder groups. Response aggregations in areas of proposed development reveal previously unknown stakeholder preferences to local decision-makers and highlight potential trade-offs for conservation management. Free-listed responses revealed deeper insight into personal opinion and context. 4. This work serves as a useful case study on how the perceptions and opinions of local people regarding local CES could be accounted for in the future planning of an urban greenspace and how thorough analysis of CES provision is important to fully-inform local-scale conservation and planning for the mutual benefit of local communities and nature.,FreelistTextFree listing information with location by coordinates and zone of the parkParticipant DemographicsParticipant demographic information, use and perceptions of the parkParticipantDemographics.csv,
DRYAD
Jones, Lizzie
593f0e2c-09b4-4ca6-82a9-117b70cecca9
Holland, Robert A.
9c245e65-06bb-4b0e-8214-2b00ad2a47df
Ball, Jennifer
628ed61b-d43f-418b-98e2-c2422c35cfdb
Sykes, Tim
4fd50c6b-d311-4aa9-ae3a-31b2945f486a
Taylor, Gail
f3851db9-d37c-4c36-8663-e5c2cb03e171
Ingwall-King, Lisa
11d0323d-f374-4488-8b47-8c4039f8889a
Snaddon, Jake L.
31a601f7-c9b0-45e2-b59b-fda9a0c5a54b
Peh, Kelvin S.-H.
0bd60207-dad8-43fb-a84a-a15e09b024cc
Jones, Lizzie
593f0e2c-09b4-4ca6-82a9-117b70cecca9
Holland, Robert A.
9c245e65-06bb-4b0e-8214-2b00ad2a47df
Ball, Jennifer
628ed61b-d43f-418b-98e2-c2422c35cfdb
Sykes, Tim
4fd50c6b-d311-4aa9-ae3a-31b2945f486a
Taylor, Gail
f3851db9-d37c-4c36-8663-e5c2cb03e171
Ingwall-King, Lisa
11d0323d-f374-4488-8b47-8c4039f8889a
Snaddon, Jake L.
31a601f7-c9b0-45e2-b59b-fda9a0c5a54b
Peh, Kelvin S.-H.
0bd60207-dad8-43fb-a84a-a15e09b024cc

Jones, Lizzie, Sykes, Tim and Ingwall-King, Lisa (2019) Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space. DRYAD doi:10.5061/dryad.427c0pr [Dataset]

Record type: Dataset

Abstract

1. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) encompass a range of social, cultural and health benefits to local communities, for example recreation, spirituality, a sense of place and local identity. However, these complex and place-specific CES are often overlooked in rapid land management decisions and assessed using broad, top–down approaches. 2. We use the Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to examine a novel approach to rapid assessment of local CES provision using inductive, participatory methods. We combined free-listing and participatory geographic information systems (GIS) techniques to quantify and map perceptions of current CES provision of an urban green space. The results were then statistically compared with those of a proposed alternative scenario with the aim to inform future decision-making. 3. By identifying changes in the spatial hotspots of CES in our study area, we revealed a spatially-specific shift toward positive sentiment regarding several CES under the alternative state with variance across demographic and stakeholder groups. Response aggregations in areas of proposed development reveal previously unknown stakeholder preferences to local decision-makers and highlight potential trade-offs for conservation management. Free-listed responses revealed deeper insight into personal opinion and context. 4. This work serves as a useful case study on how the perceptions and opinions of local people regarding local CES could be accounted for in the future planning of an urban greenspace and how thorough analysis of CES provision is important to fully-inform local-scale conservation and planning for the mutual benefit of local communities and nature.,FreelistTextFree listing information with location by coordinates and zone of the parkParticipant DemographicsParticipant demographic information, use and perceptions of the parkParticipantDemographics.csv,

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 1 January 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 448492
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/448492
PURE UUID: 752f8bb7-1522-457b-9b77-1ecb55bf4449
ORCID for Robert A. Holland: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-9227
ORCID for Gail Taylor: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8470-6390
ORCID for Jake L. Snaddon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3549-5472
ORCID for Kelvin S.-H. Peh: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2921-1341

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Apr 2021 16:31
Last modified: 24 Apr 2021 01:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×