Technical and imaging outcomes from the UK registry of prostate artery embolization (UK-ROPE) study: Focusing on predictors of clinical success

Hacking, Nigel, Vigneswaran, Ganesh, Maclean, Drew, Modi, Sachin, Dyer, Jonathan, Harris, Mark and Bryant, Timothy (2019) Technical and imaging outcomes from the UK registry of prostate artery embolization (UK-ROPE) study: Focusing on predictors of clinical success. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 42 (5), 666-676. (doi:10.1007/s00270-018-02156-8).

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The UK Registry of Prostate Artery Embolization (UK-ROPE) was a prospective, multicentre study comparing PAE against surgical therapies for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A wealth of data was collected supplementary to the main study outcomes which provide a snapshot of UK PAE practice. We aimed to interpret these data in the hope of providing insight into factors which affect clinical outcome and radiation dose.

METHODS: 216 patients (mean age 66, mean IPSS 21.3) undergoing PAE at 20 British centres from July 2014 to January 2016 were prospectively followed up to 12 months with retrospective analysis of the data. Technical outcome was evaluated based on procedural and fluoroscopy times, skin dose and dose area product (DAP). Clinical outcome was evaluated through collection of Qmax, IPSS reduction and prostate volume reduction. Multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess the significance of various patients and procedural factors on clinical outcome and patient dose.

RESULTS: Significant predictors of technical outcome which affected patient skin dose included severity of CTA-detected atheroma (p < 0.001), the practitioner (p < 0.001) and use of protective coil embolization (p = 0.019). Predictors of clinical outcome included initial prostate size (dichotomized into groups > 80 ml and = <80 ml, d = 1, p = 0.0138), embolic agent (spherical particles < 300 nm performed best, p = 0.01) and number of arteries embolized (IPSS reduction of 32.9% in unilateral PAE versus 54.4% for bilateral PAE, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION: We have identified several important factors which are associated with improved clinical outcome and increased patient dose which we hope will facilitate optimal patient selection and encourage improved embolization technique.

This record has no associated files available for download.

Contributors

Author: Ganesh Vigneswaran

Download statistics