Ultrasound grading of thyroid nodules using the BTA U-scoring guidelines – Is there evidence of intra-and interobserver variability?

Couzins, Mike, Forbes, Stuart, Vigneswaran, Ganesh, Mitra, Indu and Rutherford, Elizabeth (2021) Ultrasound grading of thyroid nodules using the BTA U-scoring guidelines – Is there evidence of intra-and interobserver variability? Ultrasound, 29 (2), 100-105. (doi:10.1177/1742271X20971323).

Abstract

Introduction U-score ultrasound classification (graded U1-U5) is widely used to grade thyroid nodules based on benign and malignant sonographic features. It is well established that ultrasound is an operator-dependent imaging modality and thus more susceptible to subjective variances between operators when using imaging-based scoring systems. We aimed to assess whether there is any intra- or interobserver variability when U-scoring thyroid nodules and whether previous thyroid ultrasound experience has an effect on this variability. Methods A total of 14 ultrasound operators were identified (five experienced thyroid operators, five with intermediate experience and four with no experience) and were asked to U-score images from 20 thyroid cases shown as a single projection, with and without Doppler flow. The cases were subsequently rescored by the 14 operators after six weeks. The first and second round U-scores for the three operator groups were then analysed using Fleiss’ kappa to assess interobserver variability and Cochran’s Q test to determine any intraobserver variability. Results We found no significant interobserver variability on combined assessment of all operators with fair agreement in round 1 (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.30, p <0.0001) and slight agreement in round 2 (Fleiss’ kappa = 0.19, p < 0.0001). Cochran’s Q test revealed no significant intraobserver variability in all 14 operators between round 1 and round 2 (all p>0.05). Conclusions We found no statistically significant inter- or intraobserver variability in the U-scoring of thyroid nodules between all participants reinforcing the validity of this scoring method in clinical practice, allaying concerns regarding potential subjective biases in reporting.

This record has no associated files available for download.

Contributors

Author: Ganesh Vigneswaran

Download statistics