The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Thermosensory mapping of skin wetness sensitivity across the body of young males and females at rest and following maximal incremental running

Thermosensory mapping of skin wetness sensitivity across the body of young males and females at rest and following maximal incremental running
Thermosensory mapping of skin wetness sensitivity across the body of young males and females at rest and following maximal incremental running
Humans lack skin hygroreceptors and we rely on integrating cold and tactile inputs from A‐type skin nerve fibres to sense wetness. Yet, it is unknown whether sex and exercise independently modulate skin wetness sensitivity across the body. We mapped local sensitivity to cold, neutral and warm wetness of the forehead, neck, underarm, lower back and dorsal foot in 10 males (27.8 ± 2.7 years; 1.92 ± 0.1 m2 body surface area) and 10 females (25.4 ± 3.9 years; 1.68 ± 0.1 m2 body surface area), at rest and post maximal incremental running. Participants underwent our quantitative sensory test where they reported the magnitude of thermal and wetness perceptions (visual analogue scale) resulting from the application of a cold (5°C below skin temperature) wet (0.8 mL of water), neutral wet and warm wet (5°C above skin temperature) thermal probe (1.32 cm2) to five skin sites. We found that: (i) females were ∼14% to ∼17% more sensitive to cold‐wetness than males, yet both sexes were as sensitive to neutral‐ and warm‐wetness; (ii) regional differences were present for cold‐wetness only, and these followed a craniocaudal increase that was more pronounced in males (i.e. the foot was ∼31% more sensitive than the forehead); and (iii) maximal exercise reduced cold‐wetness sensitivity over specific regions in males (i.e. ∼40% decrease in foot sensitivity), and also induced a generalized reduction in warm‐wetness sensitivity in both sexes (i.e. ∼4% to ∼6%). For the first time, we show that females are more sensitive to cold wetness than males and that maximal exercise induce hygro‐hypoesthesia. These novel findings expand our knowledge on sex differences in thermoregulatory physiology.
0022-3751
3315-3332
Valenza, Alessandro
60b629a5-c527-4137-8efb-6670b165d319
Bianco, Antonino
c813a96b-983f-438f-8ee8-36c67746e727
Filingeri, Davide
42502a34-e7e6-4b49-b304-ce2ae0bf7b24
Valenza, Alessandro
60b629a5-c527-4137-8efb-6670b165d319
Bianco, Antonino
c813a96b-983f-438f-8ee8-36c67746e727
Filingeri, Davide
42502a34-e7e6-4b49-b304-ce2ae0bf7b24

Valenza, Alessandro, Bianco, Antonino and Filingeri, Davide (2019) Thermosensory mapping of skin wetness sensitivity across the body of young males and females at rest and following maximal incremental running. The Journal of Physiology, 3315-3332. (doi:10.1113/JP277928).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Humans lack skin hygroreceptors and we rely on integrating cold and tactile inputs from A‐type skin nerve fibres to sense wetness. Yet, it is unknown whether sex and exercise independently modulate skin wetness sensitivity across the body. We mapped local sensitivity to cold, neutral and warm wetness of the forehead, neck, underarm, lower back and dorsal foot in 10 males (27.8 ± 2.7 years; 1.92 ± 0.1 m2 body surface area) and 10 females (25.4 ± 3.9 years; 1.68 ± 0.1 m2 body surface area), at rest and post maximal incremental running. Participants underwent our quantitative sensory test where they reported the magnitude of thermal and wetness perceptions (visual analogue scale) resulting from the application of a cold (5°C below skin temperature) wet (0.8 mL of water), neutral wet and warm wet (5°C above skin temperature) thermal probe (1.32 cm2) to five skin sites. We found that: (i) females were ∼14% to ∼17% more sensitive to cold‐wetness than males, yet both sexes were as sensitive to neutral‐ and warm‐wetness; (ii) regional differences were present for cold‐wetness only, and these followed a craniocaudal increase that was more pronounced in males (i.e. the foot was ∼31% more sensitive than the forehead); and (iii) maximal exercise reduced cold‐wetness sensitivity over specific regions in males (i.e. ∼40% decrease in foot sensitivity), and also induced a generalized reduction in warm‐wetness sensitivity in both sexes (i.e. ∼4% to ∼6%). For the first time, we show that females are more sensitive to cold wetness than males and that maximal exercise induce hygro‐hypoesthesia. These novel findings expand our knowledge on sex differences in thermoregulatory physiology.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2 July 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 449177
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/449177
ISSN: 0022-3751
PURE UUID: 8e1e671d-5a1f-4b15-be2a-047ba70bf49d
ORCID for Davide Filingeri: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-395X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 May 2021 16:40
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alessandro Valenza
Author: Antonino Bianco

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×