The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A comparison of thermoregulatory responses to exercise between mass-matched groups with large differences in body fat

A comparison of thermoregulatory responses to exercise between mass-matched groups with large differences in body fat
A comparison of thermoregulatory responses to exercise between mass-matched groups with large differences in body fat
We sought to determine 1) the influence of adiposity on thermoregulatory responses independently of the confounding biophysical factors of body mass and metabolic heat production (Hprod); and 2) whether differences in adiposity should be accounted for by prescribing an exercise intensity eliciting a fixed Hprod per kilogram of lean body mass (LBM). Nine low (LO-BF) and nine high (HI-BF) body fat males matched in pairs for total body mass (TBM; LO-BF: 88.7 ± 8.4 kg, HI-BF: 90.1 ± 7.9 kg; P = 0.72), but with distinctly different percentage body fat (%BF; LO-BF: 10.8 ± 3.6%; HI-BF: 32.0 ± 5.6%; P < 0.001), cycled for 60 min at 28.1 ± 0.2°C, 26 ± 8% relative humidity (RH), at a target Hprod of 1) 550 W (FHP trial) and 2) 7.5 W/kg LBM (LBM trial). Changes in rectal temperature (ΔTre) and local sweat rate (LSR) were measured continuously while whole body sweat loss (WBSL) and net heat loss (Hloss) were estimated over 60 min. In the FHP trial, ΔTre (LO-BF: 0.66 ± 0.21°C, HI-BF: 0.87 ± 0.18°C; P = 0.02) was greater in HI-BF, whereas mean LSR (LO-BF 0.52 ± 0.19, HI-BF 0.43 ± 0.15 mg·cm−2·min−1; P = 0.19), WBSL (LO-BF 586 ± 82 ml, HI-BF 559 ± 75 ml; P = 0.47) and Hloss (LO-BF 1,867 ± 208 kJ, HI-BF 1,826 ± 224 kJ; P = 0.69) were all similar. In the LBM trial, ΔTre (LO-BF 0.82 ± 0.18°C, HI-BF 0.54 ± 0.19°C; P < 0.001), mean LSR (LO-BF 0.59 ± 0.20, HI-BF 0.38 ± 0.12 mg·cm−2·min−1; P = 0.04), WBSL (LO-BF 580 ± 106 ml, HI-BF 381 ± 68 ml; P < 0.001), and Hloss (LO-BF 1,884 ± 277 kJ, HI-BF 1,341 ± 184 kJ; P < 0.001) were all greater at end-exercise in LO-BF. In conclusion, high %BF individuals demonstrate a greater ΔTre independently of differences in mass and Hprod, possibly due to a lower mean specific heat capacity or impaired sudomotor control. However, thermoregulatory responses of groups with different adiposity levels should not be compared using a fixed Hprod in watts per kilogram lean body mass
615-623
Dervis, S.
4f3fc735-ed73-4f56-8b46-d6440db02617
Coombs, G.B.
bca148f2-1659-4633-bda2-331d60029458
Chaseling, G.K.
34771262-b371-4d37-b631-e60d5e65d752
Filingeri, D.
42502a34-e7e6-4b49-b304-ce2ae0bf7b24
Smoljanic, J.
bba7864f-5a38-4a86-b73c-4142a2e43fdb
Jay, O.
2e255cfd-1fc6-4ce7-891d-4fcba88c0250
Dervis, S.
4f3fc735-ed73-4f56-8b46-d6440db02617
Coombs, G.B.
bca148f2-1659-4633-bda2-331d60029458
Chaseling, G.K.
34771262-b371-4d37-b631-e60d5e65d752
Filingeri, D.
42502a34-e7e6-4b49-b304-ce2ae0bf7b24
Smoljanic, J.
bba7864f-5a38-4a86-b73c-4142a2e43fdb
Jay, O.
2e255cfd-1fc6-4ce7-891d-4fcba88c0250

Dervis, S., Coombs, G.B., Chaseling, G.K., Filingeri, D., Smoljanic, J. and Jay, O. (2016) A comparison of thermoregulatory responses to exercise between mass-matched groups with large differences in body fat. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 120 (6), 615-623. (doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00906.2015).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We sought to determine 1) the influence of adiposity on thermoregulatory responses independently of the confounding biophysical factors of body mass and metabolic heat production (Hprod); and 2) whether differences in adiposity should be accounted for by prescribing an exercise intensity eliciting a fixed Hprod per kilogram of lean body mass (LBM). Nine low (LO-BF) and nine high (HI-BF) body fat males matched in pairs for total body mass (TBM; LO-BF: 88.7 ± 8.4 kg, HI-BF: 90.1 ± 7.9 kg; P = 0.72), but with distinctly different percentage body fat (%BF; LO-BF: 10.8 ± 3.6%; HI-BF: 32.0 ± 5.6%; P < 0.001), cycled for 60 min at 28.1 ± 0.2°C, 26 ± 8% relative humidity (RH), at a target Hprod of 1) 550 W (FHP trial) and 2) 7.5 W/kg LBM (LBM trial). Changes in rectal temperature (ΔTre) and local sweat rate (LSR) were measured continuously while whole body sweat loss (WBSL) and net heat loss (Hloss) were estimated over 60 min. In the FHP trial, ΔTre (LO-BF: 0.66 ± 0.21°C, HI-BF: 0.87 ± 0.18°C; P = 0.02) was greater in HI-BF, whereas mean LSR (LO-BF 0.52 ± 0.19, HI-BF 0.43 ± 0.15 mg·cm−2·min−1; P = 0.19), WBSL (LO-BF 586 ± 82 ml, HI-BF 559 ± 75 ml; P = 0.47) and Hloss (LO-BF 1,867 ± 208 kJ, HI-BF 1,826 ± 224 kJ; P = 0.69) were all similar. In the LBM trial, ΔTre (LO-BF 0.82 ± 0.18°C, HI-BF 0.54 ± 0.19°C; P < 0.001), mean LSR (LO-BF 0.59 ± 0.20, HI-BF 0.38 ± 0.12 mg·cm−2·min−1; P = 0.04), WBSL (LO-BF 580 ± 106 ml, HI-BF 381 ± 68 ml; P < 0.001), and Hloss (LO-BF 1,884 ± 277 kJ, HI-BF 1,341 ± 184 kJ; P < 0.001) were all greater at end-exercise in LO-BF. In conclusion, high %BF individuals demonstrate a greater ΔTre independently of differences in mass and Hprod, possibly due to a lower mean specific heat capacity or impaired sudomotor control. However, thermoregulatory responses of groups with different adiposity levels should not be compared using a fixed Hprod in watts per kilogram lean body mass

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 22 December 2015
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 March 2016
Published date: 15 March 2016

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 449185
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/449185
PURE UUID: 4f76a69f-a794-4ca0-9eaa-6e7aaa061ef5
ORCID for D. Filingeri: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-395X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 May 2021 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:05

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: S. Dervis
Author: G.B. Coombs
Author: G.K. Chaseling
Author: D. Filingeri ORCID iD
Author: J. Smoljanic
Author: O. Jay

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×