The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

654. Evaluation of the febridx host response point-of-care test to differentiate viral from bacterial etiology in adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness during influenza season

654. Evaluation of the febridx host response point-of-care test to differentiate viral from bacterial etiology in adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness during influenza season
654. Evaluation of the febridx host response point-of-care test to differentiate viral from bacterial etiology in adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness during influenza season
Background: antibiotics are overused in patients hospitalized with acute respiratory illness (ARI). Diagnostic uncertainty regarding microbial etiology contributes to this practice and so a host response test that can distinguish between viral and bacterial infection has the potential to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. The FebriDx is a low cost, rapid, host response POCT that uses fingerpick blood samples to distinguish between viral and bacterial infection but has not been evaluated in hospitalized adults with ARI.

Methods: we took fingerpick blood samples from adult patients with ARI, hospitalized during influenza season, and tested them on the FebriDx. Respiratory samples were tested for viruses on the FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FARP). The FebriDx was evaluated for ease of use, failure rate and accuracy of the results (Viral, Bacterial, Negative).

Results: 149 patients were approached and 10 patients declined fingerpick testing. A valid result was obtained from 124/139 (89%) overall. Common user comments included test failure due to difficulty of getting blood to fill the capillary tube and difficulty in interpreting the results lines due to the variability of color change. 111/124 (89%) were tested for viruses by FARP. 69/111 (62%) had viruses detected. Of 69 patients with viruses detected, 41 (59%) had influenza, 12 (17%) rhino/enterovirus and 16 (23%) other viruses. 44/69 (64%) had a viral FebriDx result. For influenza-positive patients 34/41 (83%) had a viral FebriDx result, 1/12(8%) of rhinovirus-positive patients had a viral FebriDx result and 9/16 (56%) of patients with other viruses detected had a viral FebriDx result. These are interim results. Full results for 200 patients will be available at presentation.

Conclusion: the use of the FebriDx POC was associated with a failure rate of ~10% and problems with the interpretation of result lines. FebriDx was not sufficiently accurate in differentiating viral and bacterial infection when using detection of virus by PCR as the definition of viral infection; however, FebriDx had a high PPV for all viral detection and for influenza detection in this cohort and could have utility in hospital emergency departments.
2328-8957
S300-S301
Beard, Kate
85604fec-3541-48cb-9abf-a76c2a32c3f1
Chan, Cathleen
7dee73d4-6074-4f28-bb2a-43c33b3f51db
Mills, Samuel
bf3525fe-f39a-4896-8ee3-5b60ad704b6f
Poole, Stephen
440d7904-ab72-469c-892b-c910cd1cb19b
Brendish, Nathan
a8a4189e-01eb-4ab3-933e-a24cd188a4d7
Clark, Tristan William
712ec18e-613c-45df-a013-c8a22834e14f
Beard, Kate
85604fec-3541-48cb-9abf-a76c2a32c3f1
Chan, Cathleen
7dee73d4-6074-4f28-bb2a-43c33b3f51db
Mills, Samuel
bf3525fe-f39a-4896-8ee3-5b60ad704b6f
Poole, Stephen
440d7904-ab72-469c-892b-c910cd1cb19b
Brendish, Nathan
a8a4189e-01eb-4ab3-933e-a24cd188a4d7
Clark, Tristan William
712ec18e-613c-45df-a013-c8a22834e14f

Beard, Kate, Chan, Cathleen, Mills, Samuel, Poole, Stephen, Brendish, Nathan and Clark, Tristan William (2019) 654. Evaluation of the febridx host response point-of-care test to differentiate viral from bacterial etiology in adults hospitalized with acute respiratory illness during influenza season. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 6 (Supplement_2), S300-S301. (doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz360.722).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: antibiotics are overused in patients hospitalized with acute respiratory illness (ARI). Diagnostic uncertainty regarding microbial etiology contributes to this practice and so a host response test that can distinguish between viral and bacterial infection has the potential to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. The FebriDx is a low cost, rapid, host response POCT that uses fingerpick blood samples to distinguish between viral and bacterial infection but has not been evaluated in hospitalized adults with ARI.

Methods: we took fingerpick blood samples from adult patients with ARI, hospitalized during influenza season, and tested them on the FebriDx. Respiratory samples were tested for viruses on the FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FARP). The FebriDx was evaluated for ease of use, failure rate and accuracy of the results (Viral, Bacterial, Negative).

Results: 149 patients were approached and 10 patients declined fingerpick testing. A valid result was obtained from 124/139 (89%) overall. Common user comments included test failure due to difficulty of getting blood to fill the capillary tube and difficulty in interpreting the results lines due to the variability of color change. 111/124 (89%) were tested for viruses by FARP. 69/111 (62%) had viruses detected. Of 69 patients with viruses detected, 41 (59%) had influenza, 12 (17%) rhino/enterovirus and 16 (23%) other viruses. 44/69 (64%) had a viral FebriDx result. For influenza-positive patients 34/41 (83%) had a viral FebriDx result, 1/12(8%) of rhinovirus-positive patients had a viral FebriDx result and 9/16 (56%) of patients with other viruses detected had a viral FebriDx result. These are interim results. Full results for 200 patients will be available at presentation.

Conclusion: the use of the FebriDx POC was associated with a failure rate of ~10% and problems with the interpretation of result lines. FebriDx was not sufficiently accurate in differentiating viral and bacterial infection when using detection of virus by PCR as the definition of viral infection; however, FebriDx had a high PPV for all viral detection and for influenza detection in this cohort and could have utility in hospital emergency departments.

Text
ofz360.722 - Version of Record
Download (738kB)

More information

Published date: 23 October 2019

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 449249
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/449249
ISSN: 2328-8957
PURE UUID: 164f536f-bf45-41a4-b5c8-ad0509b29f7e
ORCID for Nathan Brendish: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4937
ORCID for Tristan William Clark: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-5295

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 May 2021 16:32
Last modified: 21 Nov 2024 02:58

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kate Beard
Author: Cathleen Chan
Author: Samuel Mills
Author: Stephen Poole
Author: Nathan Brendish ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×