Assessing sociology and psychology in UK undergraduate medical education: Square peg in a round hole?
Assessing sociology and psychology in UK undergraduate medical education: Square peg in a round hole?
Background: Attention has turned in recent years to the broader inclusion of sociology and psychology in medical curricula. Despite this, there is limited published evidence about how best to assess these subjects. This lack of evidence is significant given that most medical schools are likely to include some form of assessment of sociology and psychology, and that sociology and psychology are included in areas examined in admissions tests and in licensing exams.
Methods: We ran three one day workshops in the UK (London, Edinburgh and Manchester, June – July 2019), to consult with educators involved in sociology and psychology teaching in medicine on: what methods are being used to assess sociology and psychology in UK undergraduate medical education, and the challenges and opportunities experienced. 36 participants attended the workshops, representing 19 of the 33 UK medical schools. Following the workshops, we collated the notes and presentations in order to develop a summary of current assessment practices and synthesis of the main themes identified.
Results:There were many examples of good practice and development of innovative assessments, particularly in the early years of the programmes. At the same time, participants raised several challenges and tensions in relation to the method, timing, and placement of sociology and psychology assessment. Participants reported that many of these issues related to dominant assessment cultures in medical education. As a result, assessing sociology and psychology in medicine can seem like fitting a square peg into a round hole. Solutions to these challenges may require wider changes to assessment practices and cultures.
Conclusion: The challenges shared by participants are evident; nonetheless, there are important opportunities. Our participants were unanimous in their desire to become involved in dialogue and consultation about assessment. This article, reporting on the views of UK SBS educators, is a positive step towards creating a more robust evidence base upon which to engage in these conversations and inform best practice in sociology and psychology assessment.
Sociology and Psychology; Assessment; Social and Behavioural Sciences
Harden, Jeni
7fff4fcf-ff0e-49e7-9617-accceb9c037e
Collett, Tracey
10865407-688f-4db1-bc96-0631257458e7
Forrest, Simon
434065fa-5c91-4e41-889e-4d1a6be15305
Kendall, Kathleen
7c1c7abc-513b-4da5-b99d-268cd1d8bc58
17 May 2021
Harden, Jeni
7fff4fcf-ff0e-49e7-9617-accceb9c037e
Collett, Tracey
10865407-688f-4db1-bc96-0631257458e7
Forrest, Simon
434065fa-5c91-4e41-889e-4d1a6be15305
Kendall, Kathleen
7c1c7abc-513b-4da5-b99d-268cd1d8bc58
Harden, Jeni, Collett, Tracey, Forrest, Simon and Kendall, Kathleen
(2021)
Assessing sociology and psychology in UK undergraduate medical education: Square peg in a round hole?
MedEdPublish.
(doi:10.15694/mep.2021.000133.1).
Abstract
Background: Attention has turned in recent years to the broader inclusion of sociology and psychology in medical curricula. Despite this, there is limited published evidence about how best to assess these subjects. This lack of evidence is significant given that most medical schools are likely to include some form of assessment of sociology and psychology, and that sociology and psychology are included in areas examined in admissions tests and in licensing exams.
Methods: We ran three one day workshops in the UK (London, Edinburgh and Manchester, June – July 2019), to consult with educators involved in sociology and psychology teaching in medicine on: what methods are being used to assess sociology and psychology in UK undergraduate medical education, and the challenges and opportunities experienced. 36 participants attended the workshops, representing 19 of the 33 UK medical schools. Following the workshops, we collated the notes and presentations in order to develop a summary of current assessment practices and synthesis of the main themes identified.
Results:There were many examples of good practice and development of innovative assessments, particularly in the early years of the programmes. At the same time, participants raised several challenges and tensions in relation to the method, timing, and placement of sociology and psychology assessment. Participants reported that many of these issues related to dominant assessment cultures in medical education. As a result, assessing sociology and psychology in medicine can seem like fitting a square peg into a round hole. Solutions to these challenges may require wider changes to assessment practices and cultures.
Conclusion: The challenges shared by participants are evident; nonetheless, there are important opportunities. Our participants were unanimous in their desire to become involved in dialogue and consultation about assessment. This article, reporting on the views of UK SBS educators, is a positive step towards creating a more robust evidence base upon which to engage in these conversations and inform best practice in sociology and psychology assessment.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 17 May 2021
Keywords:
Sociology and Psychology; Assessment; Social and Behavioural Sciences
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 449471
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/449471
ISSN: 2312-7996
PURE UUID: 9c4f0f70-d0a6-4708-b702-2727ef08a2bd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 02 Jun 2021 16:33
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 12:27
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jeni Harden
Author:
Tracey Collett
Author:
Simon Forrest
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics