Assessing social equity in Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) interventions: findings from Ghana
Assessing social equity in Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) interventions: findings from Ghana
Achieving social equity in land and forest restoration is a key objective of major international frameworks and commitments, including the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Meeting this objective requires consideration of key governance ques- tions such as who makes decisions about what is restored, where, and how? And how do factors specific to local contexts influence which decisions are made, and, in turn, the distribution of benefits? Despite the demonstrated importance of social equity on project outcomes in many natural resource-based fields, there have to date been no assessments of social equity of farmer-managed natural regeneration (FMNR), an approach used mainly for restoring degraded agricultural land. Drawing on findings from community-based fieldwork in 2019–2020 in northeastern Ghana, this paper aims to fill this void. We address the following question: How do historical, socio-ecological, and political processes condition prospects for social equity in FMNR interventions? Key findings were: 1) Preexisting hierarchies in authority, control, and access over land and trees shaped decision-making in project design and the potential distribution of benefits from FMNR 2) FMNR, when implemented on farmland, generally aligned with local agroecological practices; but, when implemented to restore communal lands, it created tensions with local perceptions of equity as well as traditional land and natural resource management practices, and 3) The FMNR project reflected the continuing salience of dominant political and environmental discourses, which carry implications for restoring landscapes with FMNR. To support practitioners, we provide several recommendations for strengthening social equity of FMNR project designs.
African Drylands, Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR), Natural Resource Governance, Social Equity, Tenure
64-76
Kandel, Matthew
99bc706c-5e04-4a9d-8687-79fca960cd76
Agaba, Genevieve
2151e355-192d-42e5-92b7-2ba204256607
Alare, Rahinatu S.
fcff31f0-a525-41fc-a14a-033920c12081
Addoah, Thomas
109d7c79-2fa2-4f9f-91fb-368ea7d973d3
Schreckenberg, Kate
31485255-e429-4ddd-a018-47bc45e66a8b
1 March 2021
Kandel, Matthew
99bc706c-5e04-4a9d-8687-79fca960cd76
Agaba, Genevieve
2151e355-192d-42e5-92b7-2ba204256607
Alare, Rahinatu S.
fcff31f0-a525-41fc-a14a-033920c12081
Addoah, Thomas
109d7c79-2fa2-4f9f-91fb-368ea7d973d3
Schreckenberg, Kate
31485255-e429-4ddd-a018-47bc45e66a8b
Kandel, Matthew, Agaba, Genevieve, Alare, Rahinatu S., Addoah, Thomas and Schreckenberg, Kate
(2021)
Assessing social equity in Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR) interventions: findings from Ghana.
Ecological Restoration, 39 (1-2), .
(doi:10.3368/er.39.1-2.64).
Abstract
Achieving social equity in land and forest restoration is a key objective of major international frameworks and commitments, including the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Meeting this objective requires consideration of key governance ques- tions such as who makes decisions about what is restored, where, and how? And how do factors specific to local contexts influence which decisions are made, and, in turn, the distribution of benefits? Despite the demonstrated importance of social equity on project outcomes in many natural resource-based fields, there have to date been no assessments of social equity of farmer-managed natural regeneration (FMNR), an approach used mainly for restoring degraded agricultural land. Drawing on findings from community-based fieldwork in 2019–2020 in northeastern Ghana, this paper aims to fill this void. We address the following question: How do historical, socio-ecological, and political processes condition prospects for social equity in FMNR interventions? Key findings were: 1) Preexisting hierarchies in authority, control, and access over land and trees shaped decision-making in project design and the potential distribution of benefits from FMNR 2) FMNR, when implemented on farmland, generally aligned with local agroecological practices; but, when implemented to restore communal lands, it created tensions with local perceptions of equity as well as traditional land and natural resource management practices, and 3) The FMNR project reflected the continuing salience of dominant political and environmental discourses, which carry implications for restoring landscapes with FMNR. To support practitioners, we provide several recommendations for strengthening social equity of FMNR project designs.
Text
64.full
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 1 March 2021
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
We thank three anonymous reviewers, an Associate Editor, Mar-lène Elias, and Carolin Dieterle for their very helpful comments and suggestions at different stages of this article. We are also grateful to the editors of this special issue for inviting us to contribute this article. We thank Chengxiu Li and Michael Batame for their support in developing the map depicting our study area. Finally, we extend our deepest gratitude to the residents of northeastern Ghana who supported this study in their capacity as research participants. This work was funded through the “Building REsearch Capacity for sustainable water and food security In drylands of sub-saharan Africa” (BRECcIA) which is supported by UK Research and Innovation as part of the Global Challenges Research Fund, grant number NE/P021093/1.
©2021 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
Keywords:
African Drylands, Farmer-Managed Natural Regeneration (FMNR), Natural Resource Governance, Social Equity, Tenure
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 449746
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/449746
PURE UUID: d9a888bc-c20c-445b-ae59-af96f74f469e
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 15 Jun 2021 16:32
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 12:35
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Genevieve Agaba
Author:
Rahinatu S. Alare
Author:
Thomas Addoah
Author:
Kate Schreckenberg
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics