The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Importance of bending stiffness of different track forms

Importance of bending stiffness of different track forms
Importance of bending stiffness of different track forms
The most common form of railway track construction is still discrete sleepers on ballast. However other types of track, sometimes referred to as ballastless, hybrid and / or slab track, may in some circumstances be more cost effective over their life cycle despite their higher initial cost. Current trackbed design methods for different types of superstructure generally specify a trackbed / subgrade support stiffness in terms of an “EV2” value, i.e. the stiffness evaluated from the second load step in a plate bearing test. Specifying the same EV2 value regardless of the track system superstructure being placed risks an over-conservative design that fails to make use of the higher longitudinal bending stiffness of ladder or slab track systems compared with ballasted track. This paper reports the results of computer analyses carried out to understand better the influence of the longitudinal bending stiffness of the track system superstructure on trackbed response. 3D models of three types of railway track superstructure system (conventional sleepers, ladder and slab track) were set up in finite element simulations. The models were validated against closed-form solutions for a beam on an elastic foundation. Parametric studies were then undertaken to understand how changes in support stiffness influenced peak trackbed deflections and stresses, for the different track superstructures. The results show that, with increasing bending stiffness of the track superstructure, peak deflections decrease and the longitudinal extent of the deflection bowl increases. There are also significant reductions in stresses being transferred into the trackbed. Slab and ladder tracks are also shown to be better at spanning regions of poor / reduced support.
Rampat, Toshan, Chandr
451de6b7-4597-4ac4-94ef-7bdf46beb575
Le Pen, Louis
4a38e256-d113-4bba-b0d4-32d41995928a
Powrie, William
600c3f02-00f8-4486-ae4b-b4fc8ec77c3c
Harkness, John
026f02e8-41d9-403f-83be-0d880058ecf1
Rampat, Toshan, Chandr
451de6b7-4597-4ac4-94ef-7bdf46beb575
Le Pen, Louis
4a38e256-d113-4bba-b0d4-32d41995928a
Powrie, William
600c3f02-00f8-4486-ae4b-b4fc8ec77c3c
Harkness, John
026f02e8-41d9-403f-83be-0d880058ecf1

Rampat, Toshan, Chandr, Le Pen, Louis, Powrie, William and Harkness, John (2021) Importance of bending stiffness of different track forms.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The most common form of railway track construction is still discrete sleepers on ballast. However other types of track, sometimes referred to as ballastless, hybrid and / or slab track, may in some circumstances be more cost effective over their life cycle despite their higher initial cost. Current trackbed design methods for different types of superstructure generally specify a trackbed / subgrade support stiffness in terms of an “EV2” value, i.e. the stiffness evaluated from the second load step in a plate bearing test. Specifying the same EV2 value regardless of the track system superstructure being placed risks an over-conservative design that fails to make use of the higher longitudinal bending stiffness of ladder or slab track systems compared with ballasted track. This paper reports the results of computer analyses carried out to understand better the influence of the longitudinal bending stiffness of the track system superstructure on trackbed response. 3D models of three types of railway track superstructure system (conventional sleepers, ladder and slab track) were set up in finite element simulations. The models were validated against closed-form solutions for a beam on an elastic foundation. Parametric studies were then undertaken to understand how changes in support stiffness influenced peak trackbed deflections and stresses, for the different track superstructures. The results show that, with increasing bending stiffness of the track superstructure, peak deflections decrease and the longitudinal extent of the deflection bowl increases. There are also significant reductions in stresses being transferred into the trackbed. Slab and ladder tracks are also shown to be better at spanning regions of poor / reduced support.

Other
track_forms
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 449866
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/449866
PURE UUID: 5a728fc0-6475-4cda-9864-b1453ffd8277
ORCID for Toshan, Chandr Rampat: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7405-3952
ORCID for Louis Le Pen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4362-3895
ORCID for William Powrie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-0826
ORCID for John Harkness: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-0791

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Jun 2021 16:30
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:50

Export record

Contributors

Author: Toshan, Chandr Rampat ORCID iD
Author: Louis Le Pen ORCID iD
Author: William Powrie ORCID iD
Author: John Harkness ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×