The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Online multidisciplinary interventions for paediatric chronic pain: a content analysis

Online multidisciplinary interventions for paediatric chronic pain: a content analysis
Online multidisciplinary interventions for paediatric chronic pain: a content analysis

Background: Many online interventions for paediatric chronic pain have been developed and evaluated. In accordance with the biopsychosocial model, the recommended treatment approach for chronic pain is multidisciplinary. Despite this, multidisciplinary components within existing online interventions have not been examined. The objective of the present review was to summarise and evaluate the content of existing online interventions for paediatric chronic pain by mapping intervention content to evidence-based guidelines for chronic pain management. Methods: Interventions were identified using an updated systematic review. Nine chronic pain management strategies that reflect evidence-based guidance for multidisciplinary chronic pain management were defined by the authors, examples of which include ‘pain education’, ‘activity pacing’ and ‘physiotherapy’. Identified interventions were then coded against the target strategies. These codes were compiled descriptively to provide an overview of how well each chronic pain management strategy was represented across the dataset, and which interventions represented the most strategies. Results: Thirty-five articles, relating to 13 unique interventions for paediatric chronic pain management were identified; few encompassed a complete multidisciplinary approach. Many CBT-based interventions included multidisciplinary elements. Across interventions, physiotherapy and non-pharmacological physical therapies were the least represented chronic pain management strategies. Conclusions: The content analysis revealed a lack of online interventions encompassing complete multidisciplinary pain management. It is important that new interventions for paediatric chronic pain management are evidence-based and reflect current best practice guidelines. Established intervention development approaches should be utilised and include a process evaluation to help identify which intervention components are effective in which contexts. Significance: This content analysis of online interventions for paediatric chronic pain highlights the need for multidisciplinary practices in pain management to be translated into online interventions. Improving the availability of pain management resources is essential for many families who cannot attend specialist pain clinics, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is potential for new resources, as well as for established resources, to be further developed to deliver a broader range of pain management content.

1090-3801
2140-2154
Hurley-Wallace, Anna
7942e783-3a78-4fd2-8794-ac62ccf96d84
Nowotny, Ewa
33b8023e-4664-4993-b801-759dea5fe916
Schoth, Daniel
73f3036e-b8cb-40b2-9466-e8e0f341fdd5
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Hurley-Wallace, Anna
7942e783-3a78-4fd2-8794-ac62ccf96d84
Nowotny, Ewa
33b8023e-4664-4993-b801-759dea5fe916
Schoth, Daniel
73f3036e-b8cb-40b2-9466-e8e0f341fdd5
Liossi, Christina
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558

Hurley-Wallace, Anna, Nowotny, Ewa, Schoth, Daniel and Liossi, Christina (2021) Online multidisciplinary interventions for paediatric chronic pain: a content analysis. European Journal of Pain, 25 (10), 2140-2154. (doi:10.1002/ejp.1827).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Many online interventions for paediatric chronic pain have been developed and evaluated. In accordance with the biopsychosocial model, the recommended treatment approach for chronic pain is multidisciplinary. Despite this, multidisciplinary components within existing online interventions have not been examined. The objective of the present review was to summarise and evaluate the content of existing online interventions for paediatric chronic pain by mapping intervention content to evidence-based guidelines for chronic pain management. Methods: Interventions were identified using an updated systematic review. Nine chronic pain management strategies that reflect evidence-based guidance for multidisciplinary chronic pain management were defined by the authors, examples of which include ‘pain education’, ‘activity pacing’ and ‘physiotherapy’. Identified interventions were then coded against the target strategies. These codes were compiled descriptively to provide an overview of how well each chronic pain management strategy was represented across the dataset, and which interventions represented the most strategies. Results: Thirty-five articles, relating to 13 unique interventions for paediatric chronic pain management were identified; few encompassed a complete multidisciplinary approach. Many CBT-based interventions included multidisciplinary elements. Across interventions, physiotherapy and non-pharmacological physical therapies were the least represented chronic pain management strategies. Conclusions: The content analysis revealed a lack of online interventions encompassing complete multidisciplinary pain management. It is important that new interventions for paediatric chronic pain management are evidence-based and reflect current best practice guidelines. Established intervention development approaches should be utilised and include a process evaluation to help identify which intervention components are effective in which contexts. Significance: This content analysis of online interventions for paediatric chronic pain highlights the need for multidisciplinary practices in pain management to be translated into online interventions. Improving the availability of pain management resources is essential for many families who cannot attend specialist pain clinics, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is potential for new resources, as well as for established resources, to be further developed to deliver a broader range of pain management content.

Text
Study_1_review_and_content_analysis_accepted_MSCRIPT (1) - Accepted Manuscript
Download (264kB)

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 22 June 2021
Published date: 22 June 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: This work was supported by a University of Southampton Jubilee +3 PhD Scholarship awarded to Ms. Hurley‐Wallace. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC ® Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 450010
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450010
ISSN: 1090-3801
PURE UUID: 03fc7fd1-e081-4a1d-aa0e-fe97430334e2
ORCID for Anna Hurley-Wallace: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8790-1247
ORCID for Christina Liossi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-6377

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Jul 2021 16:30
Last modified: 12 Nov 2024 05:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Anna Hurley-Wallace ORCID iD
Author: Ewa Nowotny
Author: Daniel Schoth

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×