International comparison of guidelines for management of impetigo: a systematic review
International comparison of guidelines for management of impetigo: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Impetigo is a common superficial skin infection that affects people worldwide and is usually treated with antibiotics; therefore, its management has implications for global antibiotic stewardship.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and narrative synthesis compares and contrasts international impetigo management guidelines.
METHODS: Guidelines for treatment of impetigo that were produced by a national authority; available to primary care physicians; and published since 2008 were included. Following a comprehensive search strategy, data extraction from eligible studies was performed independently in duplicate. Details of antiseptic and antibiotic treatment; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment; and conservative management and preventative measures were tabulated and analysed descriptively.
RESULTS: Fifty-one guidelines were included from 42 different countries. All guidelines recommended systemic antibiotics, 78% of these only for widespread lesions or failure of topical antibiotic treatment. The first-line systemic antibiotic treatment was restricted to narrow-spectrum options in 21 (41%) whilst 7 (14%) recommended only broad-spectrum antibiotics first-line. Thirty-four (67%) guidelines included recommendations for topical antibiotic use. Twenty guidelines (39%) did not mention antiseptic treatment for impetigo. Guidelines did not always provide clear indications for different treatment options.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite potentially equal efficacy to systemic antibiotics, only two-thirds of guidelines include topical antibiotic options. Many fail to include recommendations for non-antibiotic treatments such as antiseptics, preventative measures and conservative management, despite potential for antibiotic-sparing. Provision of clear definitions of disease severity and indications for treatment would enhance the ability of clinicians to adhere to recommendations.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018117770.
Hall, Leanne M
a9f8c8a3-47d5-4668-8eed-bc9e87cea7b9
Gorges, Hilary J
5ce86b6b-6723-4c77-8484-78dbe4f032fd
van Driel, Mieke
daeac878-0204-4bd3-8b06-5389a10c1ab0
Magin, Parker
3cdf4d46-2303-440c-a2a8-1b464925a17b
Francis, Nick
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Heal, Clare F
79f01228-0978-4d69-a2b1-a2f51e020944
29 June 2021
Hall, Leanne M
a9f8c8a3-47d5-4668-8eed-bc9e87cea7b9
Gorges, Hilary J
5ce86b6b-6723-4c77-8484-78dbe4f032fd
van Driel, Mieke
daeac878-0204-4bd3-8b06-5389a10c1ab0
Magin, Parker
3cdf4d46-2303-440c-a2a8-1b464925a17b
Francis, Nick
9b610883-605c-4fee-871d-defaa86ccf8e
Heal, Clare F
79f01228-0978-4d69-a2b1-a2f51e020944
Hall, Leanne M, Gorges, Hilary J, van Driel, Mieke, Magin, Parker, Francis, Nick and Heal, Clare F
(2021)
International comparison of guidelines for management of impetigo: a systematic review.
Family Practice.
(doi:10.1093/fampra/cmab066).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Impetigo is a common superficial skin infection that affects people worldwide and is usually treated with antibiotics; therefore, its management has implications for global antibiotic stewardship.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and narrative synthesis compares and contrasts international impetigo management guidelines.
METHODS: Guidelines for treatment of impetigo that were produced by a national authority; available to primary care physicians; and published since 2008 were included. Following a comprehensive search strategy, data extraction from eligible studies was performed independently in duplicate. Details of antiseptic and antibiotic treatment; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment; and conservative management and preventative measures were tabulated and analysed descriptively.
RESULTS: Fifty-one guidelines were included from 42 different countries. All guidelines recommended systemic antibiotics, 78% of these only for widespread lesions or failure of topical antibiotic treatment. The first-line systemic antibiotic treatment was restricted to narrow-spectrum options in 21 (41%) whilst 7 (14%) recommended only broad-spectrum antibiotics first-line. Thirty-four (67%) guidelines included recommendations for topical antibiotic use. Twenty guidelines (39%) did not mention antiseptic treatment for impetigo. Guidelines did not always provide clear indications for different treatment options.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite potentially equal efficacy to systemic antibiotics, only two-thirds of guidelines include topical antibiotic options. Many fail to include recommendations for non-antibiotic treatments such as antiseptics, preventative measures and conservative management, despite potential for antibiotic-sparing. Provision of clear definitions of disease severity and indications for treatment would enhance the ability of clinicians to adhere to recommendations.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018117770.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 29 June 2021
Published date: 29 June 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 450344
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450344
ISSN: 0263-2136
PURE UUID: 5f8e5a8d-a31d-4369-bb4f-d4823aa52af7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 23 Jul 2021 18:13
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Leanne M Hall
Author:
Hilary J Gorges
Author:
Mieke van Driel
Author:
Parker Magin
Author:
Clare F Heal
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics