The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Ultrasound to identify systemic lupus erythematosus patients with musculoskeletal symptoms who respond best to therapy: the US Evaluation For mUsculoskeletal Lupus longitudinal multicentre study

Ultrasound to identify systemic lupus erythematosus patients with musculoskeletal symptoms who respond best to therapy: the US Evaluation For mUsculoskeletal Lupus longitudinal multicentre study
Ultrasound to identify systemic lupus erythematosus patients with musculoskeletal symptoms who respond best to therapy: the US Evaluation For mUsculoskeletal Lupus longitudinal multicentre study
Objectives
To determine whether SLE patients with inflammatory joint symptoms and US synovitis/tenosyovitis achieve better clinical responses to glucocorticoids compared with patients with normal scans. Secondary objectives included identification of clinical features predicting US synovitis/tenosynovitis.

Methods
In a longitudinal multicentre study, SLE patients with physician-diagnosed inflammatory joint pain received intramuscular methylprednisolone 120 mg once. Clinical assessments, patient-reported outcomes and bilateral hand/wrist USs were collected at 0, 2 and 6 weeks. The primary outcome (determined via internal pilot) was the early morning stiffness visual analogue scale (EMS-VAS) at 2 weeks, adjusted for baseline, comparing patients with positive (greyscale ≥2 and/or power Doppler ≥1) and negative US. Post hoc analyses excluded FM.

Results
Of 133 patients, 78 had a positive US. Only 53 (68%) of these had one or more swollen joint. Of 66 patients with one or more swollen joint, 20% had a negative US. A positive US was associated with joint swelling, symmetrical small joint distribution and serology. The primary endpoint was not met: in the full analysis set (N = 133) there was no difference in baseline-adjusted EMS-VAS at week 2 [−7.7 mm (95% CI −19.0, 3.5); P = 0.178]. After excluding 32 patients with FM, response was significantly better in patients with a positive US at baseline [baseline-adjusted EMS-VAS at 2 weeks −12.1 mm (95% CI −22.2, −0.1); P = 0.049]. This difference was greater when adjusted for treatment [−12.8 mm (95% CI −22, −3); P = 0.007]. BILAG and SLEDAI responses were higher in US-positive patients.

Conclusion
In SLE patients without FM, those with a positive US had a better clinical response to therapy. Imaging-detected synovitis/tenosynovitis may be considered to decide on therapy and enrich clinical trials.
biomarkers, clinical trials and methods, outcome measures, systemic lupus erythematosus, ultrasound
1462-0324
5194-5204
Mahmoud, Khaled
985cb3ed-91d7-45ff-99cf-6458e664b897
Zayat, Ahmed S.
52b322a9-7648-4d8f-9955-2b0d9e28bc17
Yusof, Md Yuzaiful Md
320acc02-86ec-4a4a-b262-fde8ccc68f72
Dutton, Katherine
080ecd9d-62d3-43fd-a1a8-b1e9667e5111
Teh, Lee Suan
c6c19ae8-bbc3-445b-85f4-d2e89cf85430
Yee, Chee-Seng
4bf73452-56d6-4e7e-b4a0-108df6e439a2
D’cruz, David
57fe377c-fe40-4295-9b0f-18b5f2ff9d35
Ng, Nora
47712382-3327-4119-b5e8-07a5913970c9
Isenberg, David
e1564216-42fc-40c9-a638-8c9d64a5f14e
Ciurtin, Coziana
293fc6a8-70f4-45a5-8ccb-04decbd12ce2
Conaghan, Philip G.
b9e8364a-3056-42a5-b217-9facb9610d79
Emery, Paul
9337ca66-d17b-4963-9579-3a5d8be7246d
Edwards, Christopher J.
dcb27fec-75ea-4575-a844-3588bcf14106
Hensor, Elizabeth M.A.
7c04770c-e6ac-426b-95a6-d41282985506
Vital, Edward M.
aca2f46f-a608-4132-adf3-e7afd16b3c17
Mahmoud, Khaled
985cb3ed-91d7-45ff-99cf-6458e664b897
Zayat, Ahmed S.
52b322a9-7648-4d8f-9955-2b0d9e28bc17
Yusof, Md Yuzaiful Md
320acc02-86ec-4a4a-b262-fde8ccc68f72
Dutton, Katherine
080ecd9d-62d3-43fd-a1a8-b1e9667e5111
Teh, Lee Suan
c6c19ae8-bbc3-445b-85f4-d2e89cf85430
Yee, Chee-Seng
4bf73452-56d6-4e7e-b4a0-108df6e439a2
D’cruz, David
57fe377c-fe40-4295-9b0f-18b5f2ff9d35
Ng, Nora
47712382-3327-4119-b5e8-07a5913970c9
Isenberg, David
e1564216-42fc-40c9-a638-8c9d64a5f14e
Ciurtin, Coziana
293fc6a8-70f4-45a5-8ccb-04decbd12ce2
Conaghan, Philip G.
b9e8364a-3056-42a5-b217-9facb9610d79
Emery, Paul
9337ca66-d17b-4963-9579-3a5d8be7246d
Edwards, Christopher J.
dcb27fec-75ea-4575-a844-3588bcf14106
Hensor, Elizabeth M.A.
7c04770c-e6ac-426b-95a6-d41282985506
Vital, Edward M.
aca2f46f-a608-4132-adf3-e7afd16b3c17

Mahmoud, Khaled, Zayat, Ahmed S., Yusof, Md Yuzaiful Md, Dutton, Katherine, Teh, Lee Suan, Yee, Chee-Seng, D’cruz, David, Ng, Nora, Isenberg, David, Ciurtin, Coziana, Conaghan, Philip G., Emery, Paul, Edwards, Christopher J., Hensor, Elizabeth M.A. and Vital, Edward M. (2021) Ultrasound to identify systemic lupus erythematosus patients with musculoskeletal symptoms who respond best to therapy: the US Evaluation For mUsculoskeletal Lupus longitudinal multicentre study. Rheumatology, 60 (11), 5194-5204. (doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keab288).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives
To determine whether SLE patients with inflammatory joint symptoms and US synovitis/tenosyovitis achieve better clinical responses to glucocorticoids compared with patients with normal scans. Secondary objectives included identification of clinical features predicting US synovitis/tenosynovitis.

Methods
In a longitudinal multicentre study, SLE patients with physician-diagnosed inflammatory joint pain received intramuscular methylprednisolone 120 mg once. Clinical assessments, patient-reported outcomes and bilateral hand/wrist USs were collected at 0, 2 and 6 weeks. The primary outcome (determined via internal pilot) was the early morning stiffness visual analogue scale (EMS-VAS) at 2 weeks, adjusted for baseline, comparing patients with positive (greyscale ≥2 and/or power Doppler ≥1) and negative US. Post hoc analyses excluded FM.

Results
Of 133 patients, 78 had a positive US. Only 53 (68%) of these had one or more swollen joint. Of 66 patients with one or more swollen joint, 20% had a negative US. A positive US was associated with joint swelling, symmetrical small joint distribution and serology. The primary endpoint was not met: in the full analysis set (N = 133) there was no difference in baseline-adjusted EMS-VAS at week 2 [−7.7 mm (95% CI −19.0, 3.5); P = 0.178]. After excluding 32 patients with FM, response was significantly better in patients with a positive US at baseline [baseline-adjusted EMS-VAS at 2 weeks −12.1 mm (95% CI −22.2, −0.1); P = 0.049]. This difference was greater when adjusted for treatment [−12.8 mm (95% CI −22, −3); P = 0.007]. BILAG and SLEDAI responses were higher in US-positive patients.

Conclusion
In SLE patients without FM, those with a positive US had a better clinical response to therapy. Imaging-detected synovitis/tenosynovitis may be considered to decide on therapy and enrich clinical trials.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 March 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 April 2021
Published date: 3 November 2021
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.
Keywords: biomarkers, clinical trials and methods, outcome measures, systemic lupus erythematosus, ultrasound

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 450364
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450364
ISSN: 1462-0324
PURE UUID: b18365bd-5ce0-455d-8d73-87e819b8361c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Jul 2021 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 13:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Khaled Mahmoud
Author: Ahmed S. Zayat
Author: Md Yuzaiful Md Yusof
Author: Katherine Dutton
Author: Lee Suan Teh
Author: Chee-Seng Yee
Author: David D’cruz
Author: Nora Ng
Author: David Isenberg
Author: Coziana Ciurtin
Author: Philip G. Conaghan
Author: Paul Emery
Author: Elizabeth M.A. Hensor
Author: Edward M. Vital

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×