The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Self-esteem moderates preferences for accepting versus rejecting interaction partners

Self-esteem moderates preferences for accepting versus rejecting interaction partners
Self-esteem moderates preferences for accepting versus rejecting interaction partners
Two experiments compared the social orientations of people with high and low self-esteem (HSEs vs. LSEs). In Experiment 1, participants received positive or negative interpersonal feedback from an accepting or rejecting evaluator. HSEs chose to interact with a rejecting evaluator more often than LSEs did. In Experiment 2, participants received solely negative interpersonal feedback from an accepting or rejecting evaluator of high or low social status. This time, both HSEs and LSEs chose an accepting/high-status evaluator over a rejecting/low-status one, but only HSEs chose a rejecting/high-status evaluator over an accepting/low-status one. Implications are discussed
0046-2772
Rudich, Erich A.
0ad898c5-1e02-466e-852f-1946b3a02f50
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gregg, Aiden P.
1b03bb58-b3a5-4852-a177-29e4f633b063
Rudich, Erich A.
0ad898c5-1e02-466e-852f-1946b3a02f50
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Gregg, Aiden P.
1b03bb58-b3a5-4852-a177-29e4f633b063

Rudich, Erich A., Sedikides, Constantine and Gregg, Aiden P. (2007) Self-esteem moderates preferences for accepting versus rejecting interaction partners. European Journal of Social Psychology. (doi:10.1002/ejsp.408). (In Press)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Two experiments compared the social orientations of people with high and low self-esteem (HSEs vs. LSEs). In Experiment 1, participants received positive or negative interpersonal feedback from an accepting or rejecting evaluator. HSEs chose to interact with a rejecting evaluator more often than LSEs did. In Experiment 2, participants received solely negative interpersonal feedback from an accepting or rejecting evaluator of high or low social status. This time, both HSEs and LSEs chose an accepting/high-status evaluator over a rejecting/low-status one, but only HSEs chose a rejecting/high-status evaluator over an accepting/low-status one. Implications are discussed

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 March 2007

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 45050
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/45050
ISSN: 0046-2772
PURE UUID: cd75ed3c-723b-4d12-99b1-8ea683f2b41f
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 26 Mar 2007
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:08

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Erich A. Rudich
Author: Aiden P. Gregg

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×