Comparative assessment of nonlinear static and dynamic methods for analysing building response under sequential earthquake and tsunami
Comparative assessment of nonlinear static and dynamic methods for analysing building response under sequential earthquake and tsunami
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of different dynamic and static approaches for assessing building performance under sequential earthquakes and tsunami. A 10-storey reinforced concrete seismically designed Japanese vertical evacuation structure is adopted as a case study for the investigation. The case study building is first assessed under sequential earthquake and tsunami nonlinear response history analyses: the first time this is done in the literature. The resulting engineering demand parameters are then compared with those obtained when the analysis procedure is systematically simplified by substituting different static approaches for the nonlinear response history analyses in both the earthquake and tsunami loading phases. Different unloading approaches are also tested for the cases when an earthquake pushover is adopted. The results show that an earthquake nonlinear response history analysis, followed by a transient free vibration and a tsunami variable depth pushover, provides the best alternative to full dynamic analyses in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. This structural analysis combination is recommended and has the advantage that it does not require the tsunami inundation time history to be known in advance. The proposed double pushover approach is instead deemed only suitable for the collapse assessment of regular low to mid-rise buildings and for the development of collapse fragility functions. An important observation made is that sustained earthquake damage seems not to affect the tsunami resistance of the case study building when the fully dynamic analysis is carried out for the sequential loading. This observation will be the subject of future work.
867-887
Rossetto, Tiziana
5bd69a09-5cac-4eaf-b22a-948d07f3e058
De la Barra Bustamante, Camilo
a6f389e8-916e-49aa-958a-f1f17d14fba0
Petrone, Crescenzo
661c12d1-d9bd-4aee-b15a-23d5c09d9dd2
De la Llera, Juan Carlos
7aa9bdd9-c925-4cb3-94dc-dc55102001b2
Vásquez, Jorge
56a2858b-bb3b-43c3-a0fe-81d734fd3c97
Baiguera, Marco
8d832edf-e16f-426a-be38-6bcdc7b83545
2 April 2019
Rossetto, Tiziana
5bd69a09-5cac-4eaf-b22a-948d07f3e058
De la Barra Bustamante, Camilo
a6f389e8-916e-49aa-958a-f1f17d14fba0
Petrone, Crescenzo
661c12d1-d9bd-4aee-b15a-23d5c09d9dd2
De la Llera, Juan Carlos
7aa9bdd9-c925-4cb3-94dc-dc55102001b2
Vásquez, Jorge
56a2858b-bb3b-43c3-a0fe-81d734fd3c97
Baiguera, Marco
8d832edf-e16f-426a-be38-6bcdc7b83545
Rossetto, Tiziana, De la Barra Bustamante, Camilo, Petrone, Crescenzo, De la Llera, Juan Carlos, Vásquez, Jorge and Baiguera, Marco
(2019)
Comparative assessment of nonlinear static and dynamic methods for analysing building response under sequential earthquake and tsunami.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 48 (8), .
(doi:10.1002/eqe.3167).
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of different dynamic and static approaches for assessing building performance under sequential earthquakes and tsunami. A 10-storey reinforced concrete seismically designed Japanese vertical evacuation structure is adopted as a case study for the investigation. The case study building is first assessed under sequential earthquake and tsunami nonlinear response history analyses: the first time this is done in the literature. The resulting engineering demand parameters are then compared with those obtained when the analysis procedure is systematically simplified by substituting different static approaches for the nonlinear response history analyses in both the earthquake and tsunami loading phases. Different unloading approaches are also tested for the cases when an earthquake pushover is adopted. The results show that an earthquake nonlinear response history analysis, followed by a transient free vibration and a tsunami variable depth pushover, provides the best alternative to full dynamic analyses in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. This structural analysis combination is recommended and has the advantage that it does not require the tsunami inundation time history to be known in advance. The proposed double pushover approach is instead deemed only suitable for the collapse assessment of regular low to mid-rise buildings and for the development of collapse fragility functions. An important observation made is that sustained earthquake damage seems not to affect the tsunami resistance of the case study building when the fully dynamic analysis is carried out for the sequential loading. This observation will be the subject of future work.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 26 February 2019
Published date: 2 April 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 450556
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450556
ISSN: 0098-8847
PURE UUID: 1318a70c-493f-4291-9073-ad12722d9c33
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Aug 2021 16:32
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:06
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tiziana Rossetto
Author:
Camilo De la Barra Bustamante
Author:
Crescenzo Petrone
Author:
Juan Carlos De la Llera
Author:
Jorge Vásquez
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics