A mixed methods study to evaluate participatory mapping for rural water safety planning in western Kenya
A mixed methods study to evaluate participatory mapping for rural water safety planning in western Kenya
Water safety planning is an approach to ensure safe drinking-water access through comprehensive risk assessment and water supply management from catchment to consumer. However, its uptake remains low in rural areas. Participatory mapping, the process of map creation for resource management by local communities, has yet to be used for rural water safety planning. In this mixed methods study, to evaluate the validity of participatory mapping outputs for rural water safety planning and assess community understanding of water safety, 140 community members in Siaya County, Kenya, attended ten village-level participatory mapping sessions. They mapped drinking-water sources, ranked their safety and mapped potential contamination hazards. Findings were triangulated against a questionnaire survey of 234 households, conducted in parallel. In contrast to source type ranking for international monitoring, workshop participants ranked rainwater’s safety above piped water and identified source types such as broken pipes not explicitly recorded in water source typologies often used for formal monitoring. Participatory mapping also highlighted the overlap between livestock grazing areas and household water sources. These findings were corroborated by the household survey and subsequent participatory meetings. However, comparison with household survey data suggested participatory mapping outputs omitted some water sources and landscape-scale contamination hazards, such as open defecation areas or flood-prone areas. In follow-up visits, participant groups ranked remediation of rainwater harvesting systems as the most acceptable intervention to address hazards. We conclude that participatory mapping can complement other established approaches to rural water safety planning by capturing informally managed source use and facilitating community engagement.
e0255286
Okotto-Okotto, Joseph
a8cb5abe-ee03-4c93-978b-b02a02350e26
Yu, Weiyu
4cca6f0a-badb-4f1c-8b38-da29ba0b9e09
Kwoba, Emmah
25a80128-b537-43d4-a313-25026767b7d4
Thumbi, Samuel
74b28f8d-fafb-432f-8129-394944f2ed1a
Okotto, L.G.
2f1a266f-0bfd-4c01-9277-402c7871820f
Wanza, Peggy
fe7bfcdb-f5fd-492d-a60c-efe97fffb3b0
Gomes da Silva, D.
0a247507-43aa-4853-a41f-25d9324d9866
Wright, Jim
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
28 July 2021
Okotto-Okotto, Joseph
a8cb5abe-ee03-4c93-978b-b02a02350e26
Yu, Weiyu
4cca6f0a-badb-4f1c-8b38-da29ba0b9e09
Kwoba, Emmah
25a80128-b537-43d4-a313-25026767b7d4
Thumbi, Samuel
74b28f8d-fafb-432f-8129-394944f2ed1a
Okotto, L.G.
2f1a266f-0bfd-4c01-9277-402c7871820f
Wanza, Peggy
fe7bfcdb-f5fd-492d-a60c-efe97fffb3b0
Gomes da Silva, D.
0a247507-43aa-4853-a41f-25d9324d9866
Wright, Jim
94990ecf-f8dd-4649-84f2-b28bf272e464
Okotto-Okotto, Joseph, Yu, Weiyu, Kwoba, Emmah, Thumbi, Samuel, Okotto, L.G., Wanza, Peggy, Gomes da Silva, D. and Wright, Jim
(2021)
A mixed methods study to evaluate participatory mapping for rural water safety planning in western Kenya.
PLoS ONE, 16 (7), , [e0255286].
(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0255286).
Abstract
Water safety planning is an approach to ensure safe drinking-water access through comprehensive risk assessment and water supply management from catchment to consumer. However, its uptake remains low in rural areas. Participatory mapping, the process of map creation for resource management by local communities, has yet to be used for rural water safety planning. In this mixed methods study, to evaluate the validity of participatory mapping outputs for rural water safety planning and assess community understanding of water safety, 140 community members in Siaya County, Kenya, attended ten village-level participatory mapping sessions. They mapped drinking-water sources, ranked their safety and mapped potential contamination hazards. Findings were triangulated against a questionnaire survey of 234 households, conducted in parallel. In contrast to source type ranking for international monitoring, workshop participants ranked rainwater’s safety above piped water and identified source types such as broken pipes not explicitly recorded in water source typologies often used for formal monitoring. Participatory mapping also highlighted the overlap between livestock grazing areas and household water sources. These findings were corroborated by the household survey and subsequent participatory meetings. However, comparison with household survey data suggested participatory mapping outputs omitted some water sources and landscape-scale contamination hazards, such as open defecation areas or flood-prone areas. In follow-up visits, participant groups ranked remediation of rainwater harvesting systems as the most acceptable intervention to address hazards. We conclude that participatory mapping can complement other established approaches to rural water safety planning by capturing informally managed source use and facilitating community engagement.
Text
journal.pone.0255286
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 19 July 2021
Published date: 28 July 2021
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Okotto-Okotto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 450661
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450661
ISSN: 1932-6203
PURE UUID: 12734387-0abb-4d09-aaa5-41eb52e99004
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Aug 2021 16:32
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:59
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Joseph Okotto-Okotto
Author:
Emmah Kwoba
Author:
Samuel Thumbi
Author:
L.G. Okotto
Author:
Peggy Wanza
Author:
D. Gomes da Silva
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics