The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Challenges to implementing electronic trial data collection in primary care: a qualitative study

Challenges to implementing electronic trial data collection in primary care: a qualitative study
Challenges to implementing electronic trial data collection in primary care: a qualitative study

Background: Within-consultation recruitment to primary care trials is challenging. Ensuring procedures are efficient and self-explanatory is the key to optimising recruitment. Trial recruitment software that integrates with the electronic health record to support and partially automate procedures is becoming more common. If it works well, such software can support greater participation and more efficient trial designs. An innovative electronic trial recruitment and outcomes software was designed to support recruitment to the Runny Ear randomised controlled trial, comparing topical, oral and delayed antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media with discharge in children. A qualitative evaluation investigated the views and experiences of primary care staff using this trial software. Methods: Staff were purposively sampled in relation to site, role and whether the practice successfully recruited patients. In-depth interviews were conducted using a flexible topic guide, audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Sixteen staff were interviewed, including GPs, practice managers, information technology (IT) leads and research staff. GPs wanted trial software that automatically captures patient data. However, the experience of getting the software to work within the limited and complex IT infrastructure of primary care was frustrating and time consuming. Installation was reliant on practice level IT expertise, which varied between practices. Although most had external IT support, this rarely included supported for research IT. Arrangements for approving new software varied across practices and often, but not always, required authorisation from Clinical Commissioning Groups. Conclusions: Primary care IT systems are not solely under the control of individual practices or CCGs or the National Health Service. Rather they are part of a complex system that spans all three and is influenced by semi-autonomous stakeholders operating at different levels. This led to time consuming and sometimes insurmountable barriers to installation at the practice level. These need to be addressed if software supporting efficient research in primary care is to become a reality.

Electronic health records, Information technology, Primary health care
1471-2296
147
Cabral, Christie
e45df99c-4e9a-4d55-b9f0-923ee4b2a506
Curtis, Kathryn
d6cd1bc9-4d26-4e8e-bf8a-3f302ef4ee40
Curcin, Vasa
379cfb5c-dc0b-4eae-ac5a-d20b3a9474fe
Domínguez, Jesús
1ef20d35-90c7-4613-9afc-0a525a351eb2
Prasad, Vibhore
8a318750-a992-46ac-9c01-5c2765cb472d
Schilder, Anne
4efe172e-cbc9-4d1b-b089-f293f5c626ef
Turner, Nicholas
354da011-c0f2-46b7-b8aa-126c986e6110
Wilkes, Scott
7ec29db7-24b0-4ee6-9dc7-9743a0cdcd7c
Taylor, Jodi
875cc40a-d428-4a7d-9ee0-710051549a88
Gallagher, Sarah
24bc41f2-1868-48b6-8d8b-e5693fe2c588
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Delaney, Brendan
faccda65-7adf-4e79-b97a-b79814a016fd
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Hay, Alastair D.
94eb9d29-ede8-4b4c-ad6a-b0039d0707e3
Horwood, Jeremy
17a93c97-cc9f-4914-ab17-9fdb7dc034e4
Cabral, Christie
e45df99c-4e9a-4d55-b9f0-923ee4b2a506
Curtis, Kathryn
d6cd1bc9-4d26-4e8e-bf8a-3f302ef4ee40
Curcin, Vasa
379cfb5c-dc0b-4eae-ac5a-d20b3a9474fe
Domínguez, Jesús
1ef20d35-90c7-4613-9afc-0a525a351eb2
Prasad, Vibhore
8a318750-a992-46ac-9c01-5c2765cb472d
Schilder, Anne
4efe172e-cbc9-4d1b-b089-f293f5c626ef
Turner, Nicholas
354da011-c0f2-46b7-b8aa-126c986e6110
Wilkes, Scott
7ec29db7-24b0-4ee6-9dc7-9743a0cdcd7c
Taylor, Jodi
875cc40a-d428-4a7d-9ee0-710051549a88
Gallagher, Sarah
24bc41f2-1868-48b6-8d8b-e5693fe2c588
Little, Paul
1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
Delaney, Brendan
faccda65-7adf-4e79-b97a-b79814a016fd
Moore, Michael
1be81dad-7120-45f0-bbed-f3b0cc0cfe99
Hay, Alastair D.
94eb9d29-ede8-4b4c-ad6a-b0039d0707e3
Horwood, Jeremy
17a93c97-cc9f-4914-ab17-9fdb7dc034e4

Cabral, Christie, Curtis, Kathryn, Curcin, Vasa, Domínguez, Jesús, Prasad, Vibhore, Schilder, Anne, Turner, Nicholas, Wilkes, Scott, Taylor, Jodi, Gallagher, Sarah, Little, Paul, Delaney, Brendan, Moore, Michael, Hay, Alastair D. and Horwood, Jeremy (2021) Challenges to implementing electronic trial data collection in primary care: a qualitative study. BMC Family Practice, 22 (1), 147, [147]. (doi:10.1186/s12875-021-01498-6).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Within-consultation recruitment to primary care trials is challenging. Ensuring procedures are efficient and self-explanatory is the key to optimising recruitment. Trial recruitment software that integrates with the electronic health record to support and partially automate procedures is becoming more common. If it works well, such software can support greater participation and more efficient trial designs. An innovative electronic trial recruitment and outcomes software was designed to support recruitment to the Runny Ear randomised controlled trial, comparing topical, oral and delayed antibiotic treatment for acute otitis media with discharge in children. A qualitative evaluation investigated the views and experiences of primary care staff using this trial software. Methods: Staff were purposively sampled in relation to site, role and whether the practice successfully recruited patients. In-depth interviews were conducted using a flexible topic guide, audio recorded and transcribed. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Sixteen staff were interviewed, including GPs, practice managers, information technology (IT) leads and research staff. GPs wanted trial software that automatically captures patient data. However, the experience of getting the software to work within the limited and complex IT infrastructure of primary care was frustrating and time consuming. Installation was reliant on practice level IT expertise, which varied between practices. Although most had external IT support, this rarely included supported for research IT. Arrangements for approving new software varied across practices and often, but not always, required authorisation from Clinical Commissioning Groups. Conclusions: Primary care IT systems are not solely under the control of individual practices or CCGs or the National Health Service. Rather they are part of a complex system that spans all three and is influenced by semi-autonomous stakeholders operating at different levels. This led to time consuming and sometimes insurmountable barriers to installation at the practice level. These need to be addressed if software supporting efficient research in primary care is to become a reality.

Text
Cabral 2021 Challenges REST trial quali paper - Accepted Manuscript
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (902kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 23 June 2021
Published date: 6 July 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: This research is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (funder ref.: 16/85/01). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The TRANSFoRm trial platform was developed as part of the EU FP7 TRANSFoRm Project 247787 ( www.transformproject.eu ). Dr Prasad received salary funding as part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) academic clinical lecturer scheme, hosted by King’s College London. Other than the financial support provided, the funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. Funding Information: This study was designed and delivered in collaboration with the Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), part of the Bristol Trials Centre, a UKCRC registered clinical trials unit, which is in receipt of National Institute for Health Research CTU support funding. The University of Bristol is acting as sponsor for this study and is responsible for overall oversight of the trial; the NHS Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire Group (CCG) host the REST trial. The authors would like to thank all of the participants, parents, GPS and practice staff at each of the REST study sites for their involvement. The authors would like to thank all 15 UK CRNs for their role in the study. The authors would also like to thank members of their TSC and DMC. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords: Electronic health records, Information technology, Primary health care

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 450821
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/450821
ISSN: 1471-2296
PURE UUID: 61d22768-5535-402f-973b-1491cb2e500e
ORCID for Michael Moore: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5127-4509

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Aug 2021 16:32
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Christie Cabral
Author: Kathryn Curtis
Author: Vasa Curcin
Author: Jesús Domínguez
Author: Vibhore Prasad
Author: Anne Schilder
Author: Nicholas Turner
Author: Scott Wilkes
Author: Jodi Taylor
Author: Sarah Gallagher
Author: Paul Little
Author: Brendan Delaney
Author: Michael Moore ORCID iD
Author: Alastair D. Hay
Author: Jeremy Horwood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×