The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2

Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2
Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2
Background: In December 2020, Public Health England with NHS Test and Trace initiated a pilot study in which close contacts of people with confirmed COVID-19 were given the option to carryout lateral flow device antigen tests at home, as an alternative to self-isolation for 10–14 days. In this study, we evaluated engagement with daily testing,and assessed levels of adherence to the rules relating to behaviour following positive or negative test results.

Methods: We conducted a service evaluation of the pilot study, examining survey responses from a subset of those who responded to an evaluation questionnaire. We used an online cross-sectional survey offered to adult contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases who consented to daily testing. We used a comparison group of contacts who were not offered testing and instead self-isolated.

Results: Acceptability of daily testing was lower among survey respondents who were not offered the option of testing and among people from ethnic minority groups. Overall, 52% of respondents reported being more likely to share details of people that they had been in contact with following a positive test result, if they knew that their contacts would be offered the option of daily testing. Only 2% reported that they would be less likely to provide details of their contacts. On the days that they were trying to self-isolate, 19% of participants reported that they left the house, with no significant group differences. Following a negative test, 13% of respondents reported that they increased their contacts, but most (58%) reported having fewer risky contacts.Conclusions: Our data suggest that daily testing is potentially acceptable, may facilitate sharing contact details of close contacts among those who test positive for COVID-19, and promote adherence to self-isolation. A better understanding is needed of how to make this option more acceptable for all households. The impact of receiving a negative test on behaviour remains a risk that needs to be monitored and mitigated by appropriate messaging. Future research should examine attitudes and behaviour in a context where infection levels are lower, testing is more familiar, and restrictions on activity have been reduced.
Adherence, COVID-19, Daily testing, Engagement, Policy, Self-isolating
1471-2458
Martin, Alex
e137f6f2-bc93-4939-b56c-9ff52b8d9fd9
Denford, Sarah
8970b5a7-8cad-4356-ad0e-88297b67db37
Love, Nicola
ad596e12-5433-43f0-ae7d-8dd9da84e6a4
Ready, Derren
bc11ef15-b8f9-4372-9750-fd9c55981796
Oliver, Isabel
8cd29c59-d46a-4b7f-97ee-ad66a48cf0ff
Amlôt, Richard
d93f5263-ea24-4b12-b505-f51694220b8e
Rubin, G.J.
4776cfa7-0040-48af-8b8d-f644ae7c27ec
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e
Martin, Alex
e137f6f2-bc93-4939-b56c-9ff52b8d9fd9
Denford, Sarah
8970b5a7-8cad-4356-ad0e-88297b67db37
Love, Nicola
ad596e12-5433-43f0-ae7d-8dd9da84e6a4
Ready, Derren
bc11ef15-b8f9-4372-9750-fd9c55981796
Oliver, Isabel
8cd29c59-d46a-4b7f-97ee-ad66a48cf0ff
Amlôt, Richard
d93f5263-ea24-4b12-b505-f51694220b8e
Rubin, G.J.
4776cfa7-0040-48af-8b8d-f644ae7c27ec
Yardley, Lucy
64be42c4-511d-484d-abaa-f8813452a22e

Martin, Alex, Denford, Sarah, Love, Nicola, Ready, Derren, Oliver, Isabel, Amlôt, Richard, Rubin, G.J. and Yardley, Lucy (2021) Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2. BMC Public Health, 21 (1), [1067]. (doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11135-7).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: In December 2020, Public Health England with NHS Test and Trace initiated a pilot study in which close contacts of people with confirmed COVID-19 were given the option to carryout lateral flow device antigen tests at home, as an alternative to self-isolation for 10–14 days. In this study, we evaluated engagement with daily testing,and assessed levels of adherence to the rules relating to behaviour following positive or negative test results.

Methods: We conducted a service evaluation of the pilot study, examining survey responses from a subset of those who responded to an evaluation questionnaire. We used an online cross-sectional survey offered to adult contacts of confirmed COVID-19 cases who consented to daily testing. We used a comparison group of contacts who were not offered testing and instead self-isolated.

Results: Acceptability of daily testing was lower among survey respondents who were not offered the option of testing and among people from ethnic minority groups. Overall, 52% of respondents reported being more likely to share details of people that they had been in contact with following a positive test result, if they knew that their contacts would be offered the option of daily testing. Only 2% reported that they would be less likely to provide details of their contacts. On the days that they were trying to self-isolate, 19% of participants reported that they left the house, with no significant group differences. Following a negative test, 13% of respondents reported that they increased their contacts, but most (58%) reported having fewer risky contacts.Conclusions: Our data suggest that daily testing is potentially acceptable, may facilitate sharing contact details of close contacts among those who test positive for COVID-19, and promote adherence to self-isolation. A better understanding is needed of how to make this option more acceptable for all households. The impact of receiving a negative test on behaviour remains a risk that needs to be monitored and mitigated by appropriate messaging. Future research should examine attitudes and behaviour in a context where infection levels are lower, testing is more familiar, and restrictions on activity have been reduced.

Text
Martin_et_al-2021-BMC_Public_Health - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (996kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 19 May 2021
Published date: 5 June 2021
Additional Information: Acknowledgements Lucy Yardley is an NIHR Senior Investigator and her research programme is partly supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, and the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). Sarah Denford is supported by the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol in partnership with Public Health England. Alex F Martin is supported by the Economic and Social Research Council Grant Number ES/J500057/1 and the NIHR HPRU in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England. James Rubin supported by the NIHR HPRU in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England.This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Units (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between Public Health England, King’s College London and the University of East Anglia, and Behavioural Science and Evaluations, a partnership between Public Health England and the University of Bristol. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, Public Health England or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Keywords: Adherence, COVID-19, Daily testing, Engagement, Policy, Self-isolating

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 451049
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451049
ISSN: 1471-2458
PURE UUID: b961ec75-ca6b-4131-b3eb-2e5b3928ea76
ORCID for Lucy Yardley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3853-883X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Sep 2021 16:44
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:47

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alex Martin
Author: Sarah Denford
Author: Nicola Love
Author: Derren Ready
Author: Isabel Oliver
Author: Richard Amlôt
Author: G.J. Rubin
Author: Lucy Yardley ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×