The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: cohort study.

Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: cohort study.
Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: cohort study.

Background: Whereas several predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy have been reported, the role of cognitive function is largely unknown. Accordingly, our objective was to evaluate the association between scores from an array of cognitive function tests and self-reported vaccine hesitancy after the announcement of the successful testing of the first COVID-19 vaccine (Oxford University/AstraZeneca). Methods: We used individual-level data from a pandemic-focused study ('COVID Survey'), a prospective cohort study nested within United Kingdom Understanding Society ('Main Survey'). In the week immediately following the announcement of successful testing of the first efficacious inoculation (November/December 2020), data on vaccine intentionality were collected in 11,740 individuals (6702 women) aged 16–95 years. Pre-pandemic scores on general cognitive function, ascertained from a battery of six tests, were captured in 2011/12 wave of the Main Survey. Study members self-reported their intention to take up a vaccination in the COVID-19 Survey. Results: Of the study sample, 17.2% (N = 1842) indicated they were hesitant about having the vaccine. After adjustment for age, sex, and ethnicity, study members with a lower baseline cognition score were markedly more likely to be vaccine hesitant (odds ratio per standard deviation lower score in cognition; 95% confidence interval: 1.76; 1.62, 1.90). Adjustment for mental and physical health plus household shielding status had no impact on these results, whereas controlling for educational attainment led to partial attenuation but the probability of hesitancy was still elevated (1.52; 1.37, 1.67). There was a linear association for vaccine hesitancy across the full range of cognition scores (p for trend: p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Erroneous social media reports might have complicated personal decision-making, leading to people with lower cognitive ability being vaccine-hesitant. With individuals with lower cognition also experiencing higher rates of COVID-19 in studies conducted prior to vaccine distribution, these new findings are suggestive of a potential additional disease burden.

COVID-19, Cognitive ability, Cognitive function, Cohort, IQ, Mental ability, Vaccine hesitancy
0889-1591
100-105
David Batty, G.
4f7123a8-497f-44c4-8a6c-a42462e2102d
Deary, Ian J.
027158ae-fbfb-40ea-98b1-32d2690499ac
Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe
2b19d42d-7f57-49aa-a1d5-43e8c1c567c7
Gale, Catharine
5bb2abb3-7b53-42d6-8aa7-817e193140c8
Altschul, Drew M.
733a0f68-fe0b-424a-a659-0bd19bf40dff
David Batty, G.
4f7123a8-497f-44c4-8a6c-a42462e2102d
Deary, Ian J.
027158ae-fbfb-40ea-98b1-32d2690499ac
Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe
2b19d42d-7f57-49aa-a1d5-43e8c1c567c7
Gale, Catharine
5bb2abb3-7b53-42d6-8aa7-817e193140c8
Altschul, Drew M.
733a0f68-fe0b-424a-a659-0bd19bf40dff

David Batty, G., Deary, Ian J., Fawns-Ritchie, Chloe, Gale, Catharine and Altschul, Drew M. (2021) Pre-pandemic cognitive function and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: cohort study. Brain, Behavior and Immunity, 96, 100-105. (doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2021.05.016).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Whereas several predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy have been reported, the role of cognitive function is largely unknown. Accordingly, our objective was to evaluate the association between scores from an array of cognitive function tests and self-reported vaccine hesitancy after the announcement of the successful testing of the first COVID-19 vaccine (Oxford University/AstraZeneca). Methods: We used individual-level data from a pandemic-focused study ('COVID Survey'), a prospective cohort study nested within United Kingdom Understanding Society ('Main Survey'). In the week immediately following the announcement of successful testing of the first efficacious inoculation (November/December 2020), data on vaccine intentionality were collected in 11,740 individuals (6702 women) aged 16–95 years. Pre-pandemic scores on general cognitive function, ascertained from a battery of six tests, were captured in 2011/12 wave of the Main Survey. Study members self-reported their intention to take up a vaccination in the COVID-19 Survey. Results: Of the study sample, 17.2% (N = 1842) indicated they were hesitant about having the vaccine. After adjustment for age, sex, and ethnicity, study members with a lower baseline cognition score were markedly more likely to be vaccine hesitant (odds ratio per standard deviation lower score in cognition; 95% confidence interval: 1.76; 1.62, 1.90). Adjustment for mental and physical health plus household shielding status had no impact on these results, whereas controlling for educational attainment led to partial attenuation but the probability of hesitancy was still elevated (1.52; 1.37, 1.67). There was a linear association for vaccine hesitancy across the full range of cognition scores (p for trend: p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Erroneous social media reports might have complicated personal decision-making, leading to people with lower cognitive ability being vaccine-hesitant. With individuals with lower cognition also experiencing higher rates of COVID-19 in studies conducted prior to vaccine distribution, these new findings are suggestive of a potential additional disease burden.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 17 May 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 20 May 2021
Published date: August 2021
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Keywords: COVID-19, Cognitive ability, Cognitive function, Cohort, IQ, Mental ability, Vaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 451075
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451075
ISSN: 0889-1591
PURE UUID: 5e5d91d7-056e-4f8e-a02d-0946b08d4a9e
ORCID for Catharine Gale: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3361-8638

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Sep 2021 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G. David Batty
Author: Ian J. Deary
Author: Chloe Fawns-Ritchie
Author: Catharine Gale ORCID iD
Author: Drew M. Altschul

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×