The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The ethics ecosystem: Personal ethics, network governance and regulating actors governing the use of social media research data

The ethics ecosystem: Personal ethics, network governance and regulating actors governing the use of social media research data
The ethics ecosystem: Personal ethics, network governance and regulating actors governing the use of social media research data
This paper examines the consequences of a culture of “personal ethics” when using new methodologies, such as the use of social media (SM) sites as a source of data for research. Using SM research as an example, this paper explores the practices of a number of actors and researchers within the “Ethics Ecosystem” which as a network governs ethically responsible research behaviour. In the case of SM research, the ethical use of this data is currently in dispute, as even though it is seemingly publically available, concerns relating to privacy, vulnerability, potential harm and consent blur the lines of responsible ethical research behaviour. The findings point to the dominance of a personal, bottom-up, researcher-led, ‘ethical barometer’ for making decisions regarding the permissibility of using SM data. We show that the use of different barometers by different researchers can lead to wide disparities in ethical practice - disparities which are compounded by the lack of firm guidelines for responsible practice of SM research. This has widespread consequences on the development of shared norms and understandings at all levels, and by all actors within the Ethics Ecosystem, and risks inconsistencies in their approaches to ethical decision-making. This paper argues that this governance of ethical behaviour by individual researchers perpetuates a negative cycle of academic practice that is dependent on subjective judgements by researchers themselves, rather than governed by more formalised academic institutions such as the research ethics committee and funding council guidelines.
Ethics, Evaluation, Governance, Internet research, Research ethics, Social media
0026-4695
317-343
Samuel, Gabrielle Natalie
66af6213-08de-4c0e-92c1-12083ec456e3
Derrick, Gemma
9403a4d9-e3f2-40d9-9483-7fcad8523468
Van Leeuwen, Thed
57c9cd31-dc6b-4bfe-83b0-c686931d439c
Samuel, Gabrielle Natalie
66af6213-08de-4c0e-92c1-12083ec456e3
Derrick, Gemma
9403a4d9-e3f2-40d9-9483-7fcad8523468
Van Leeuwen, Thed
57c9cd31-dc6b-4bfe-83b0-c686931d439c

Samuel, Gabrielle Natalie, Derrick, Gemma and Van Leeuwen, Thed (2019) The ethics ecosystem: Personal ethics, network governance and regulating actors governing the use of social media research data. Minerva, 57 (3), 317-343. (doi:10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper examines the consequences of a culture of “personal ethics” when using new methodologies, such as the use of social media (SM) sites as a source of data for research. Using SM research as an example, this paper explores the practices of a number of actors and researchers within the “Ethics Ecosystem” which as a network governs ethically responsible research behaviour. In the case of SM research, the ethical use of this data is currently in dispute, as even though it is seemingly publically available, concerns relating to privacy, vulnerability, potential harm and consent blur the lines of responsible ethical research behaviour. The findings point to the dominance of a personal, bottom-up, researcher-led, ‘ethical barometer’ for making decisions regarding the permissibility of using SM data. We show that the use of different barometers by different researchers can lead to wide disparities in ethical practice - disparities which are compounded by the lack of firm guidelines for responsible practice of SM research. This has widespread consequences on the development of shared norms and understandings at all levels, and by all actors within the Ethics Ecosystem, and risks inconsistencies in their approaches to ethical decision-making. This paper argues that this governance of ethical behaviour by individual researchers perpetuates a negative cycle of academic practice that is dependent on subjective judgements by researchers themselves, rather than governed by more formalised academic institutions such as the research ethics committee and funding council guidelines.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 15 September 2019
Published date: 15 September 2019
Keywords: Ethics, Evaluation, Governance, Internet research, Research ethics, Social media

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 451222
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451222
ISSN: 0026-4695
PURE UUID: 33ca49b0-100a-4d91-a3e6-4f954bbd21fc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Sep 2021 18:16
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 10:28

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gemma Derrick
Author: Thed Van Leeuwen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×