"Reasoning “uncharted territory”: Notions of expertise within ethics review panels assessing research use of social media"
"Reasoning “uncharted territory”: Notions of expertise within ethics review panels assessing research use of social media"
The fast changing field of social media (SM) research presents unique challenges for research ethics committees (RECs). This article examines notions of experience and expertise in the context of REC members reviewing proposals for SM research and considers the role of the RECs in this area of review. We analyze 19 interviews with REC members to highlight that a lack of personal and professional experience of SM, compounded by a lack of institutional and professional guidelines, mean many REC members feel they do not possess sufficient expertise to review SM research. This view was supported by 14 interviews with SM researchers. REC members drew on strategies to overcome their lack of experience, although most SM researchers still found this problematic, to varying degrees. We recommend several steps to ensure REC expertise in SM research keeps pace of this fast-developing field, taking a pro-active, dialogic approach.
ethics, experience, expertise, research ethics committee, social media
28-39
Sellers, Chelsea
7bbe2d3c-52d8-4d5f-bf3d-c80774b4c4c4
Samuel, Gabrielle
66af6213-08de-4c0e-92c1-12083ec456e3
Derrick, Gemma
9403a4d9-e3f2-40d9-9483-7fcad8523468
13 December 2019
Sellers, Chelsea
7bbe2d3c-52d8-4d5f-bf3d-c80774b4c4c4
Samuel, Gabrielle
66af6213-08de-4c0e-92c1-12083ec456e3
Derrick, Gemma
9403a4d9-e3f2-40d9-9483-7fcad8523468
Sellers, Chelsea, Samuel, Gabrielle and Derrick, Gemma
(2019)
"Reasoning “uncharted territory”: Notions of expertise within ethics review panels assessing research use of social media".
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15 (1-2), .
(doi:10.1177/1556264619837088).
Abstract
The fast changing field of social media (SM) research presents unique challenges for research ethics committees (RECs). This article examines notions of experience and expertise in the context of REC members reviewing proposals for SM research and considers the role of the RECs in this area of review. We analyze 19 interviews with REC members to highlight that a lack of personal and professional experience of SM, compounded by a lack of institutional and professional guidelines, mean many REC members feel they do not possess sufficient expertise to review SM research. This view was supported by 14 interviews with SM researchers. REC members drew on strategies to overcome their lack of experience, although most SM researchers still found this problematic, to varying degrees. We recommend several steps to ensure REC expertise in SM research keeps pace of this fast-developing field, taking a pro-active, dialogic approach.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
e-pub ahead of print date: 12 December 2019
Published date: 13 December 2019
Keywords:
ethics, experience, expertise, research ethics committee, social media
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 451232
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451232
ISSN: 1556-2646
PURE UUID: dcff77a8-f100-43b6-8c82-9e9849f9b167
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Sep 2021 20:15
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 10:28
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Chelsea Sellers
Author:
Gemma Derrick
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics