A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors
Aims: doctors’ mental health is a national concern – the General Medical Council, British Medical Association and Health Education England pledge to improve their well-being. Well-being has no common definition, instead pathogenic measures such as burnout are published as a demonstration of doctors’ wellbeing. Yet, the relationship between burnout and wel-being has not been explored.
Aim: to investigate the relationship between burnout and well-being.
Hypothesis: they are negatively associated, but not opposites.
Method: an online cross-sectional national survey was distributed to doctors of all grades and specialties via the Royal Colleges and doctor organisations. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) measured burnout, and the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) measured well-being. Correlation coefficients between total scores of these measures estimated the relationship. Additionally, semi-structured interviews explored personal definitions of wellbeing and its relationship with burnout. Thematic analysis was carried out.
Result: 64 doctors completed the OLBI and WEMWBS. Comparing the total scores for the questionnaires with Spearman's rho indicates a moderate negative correlation (rs= –0.658, p = 0.00, n = 64). Total scores were made into binary variables, a Chi-square test showed that a low WEMWBS score (<40) and a very high risk OLBI score (≥2.85 exhaustion and ≥2.6 disengagement) were statistically significantly associated (X 2 (1, N = 64) = 4.232, p = 0.04). Three themes emerged from the 10 interviews conducted: the importance of networks/relationships outside work; scepticism towards the proposal of an NHS wellbeing check-in; and how participants do not strive to improve their wellbeing until its decline.
Conclusion: this research demonstrates that wellbeing and burnout have only a moderate negative correlation when using commonly employed measurement tools. Therefore, measures of burnout are not a surrogate for wellbeing. Further research could adopt a salutogenic approach by using the WEMWBS to monitor doctors’ wellbeing and could explore interventions to increase well-being, rather than waiting for its decline.
S32-S33
Boxley, Emma
68c07bce-e1a6-4837-895e-43ff7c6fabcf
Jenkins, John
96fdfbbd-a40b-438d-8cfc-f8f5b2cb8159
Simons, Gemma
fd1eb2bd-23d4-42a8-899b-5eeb5ad62b9c
9 June 2021
Boxley, Emma
68c07bce-e1a6-4837-895e-43ff7c6fabcf
Jenkins, John
96fdfbbd-a40b-438d-8cfc-f8f5b2cb8159
Simons, Gemma
fd1eb2bd-23d4-42a8-899b-5eeb5ad62b9c
Boxley, Emma, Jenkins, John and Simons, Gemma
(2021)
A national cross-sectional survey and interviews exploring the relationship between well-being and burnout in doctors.
BJPsych Open, 7, .
(doi:10.1192/bjo.2021.139).
Abstract
Aims: doctors’ mental health is a national concern – the General Medical Council, British Medical Association and Health Education England pledge to improve their well-being. Well-being has no common definition, instead pathogenic measures such as burnout are published as a demonstration of doctors’ wellbeing. Yet, the relationship between burnout and wel-being has not been explored.
Aim: to investigate the relationship between burnout and well-being.
Hypothesis: they are negatively associated, but not opposites.
Method: an online cross-sectional national survey was distributed to doctors of all grades and specialties via the Royal Colleges and doctor organisations. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) measured burnout, and the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) measured well-being. Correlation coefficients between total scores of these measures estimated the relationship. Additionally, semi-structured interviews explored personal definitions of wellbeing and its relationship with burnout. Thematic analysis was carried out.
Result: 64 doctors completed the OLBI and WEMWBS. Comparing the total scores for the questionnaires with Spearman's rho indicates a moderate negative correlation (rs= –0.658, p = 0.00, n = 64). Total scores were made into binary variables, a Chi-square test showed that a low WEMWBS score (<40) and a very high risk OLBI score (≥2.85 exhaustion and ≥2.6 disengagement) were statistically significantly associated (X 2 (1, N = 64) = 4.232, p = 0.04). Three themes emerged from the 10 interviews conducted: the importance of networks/relationships outside work; scepticism towards the proposal of an NHS wellbeing check-in; and how participants do not strive to improve their wellbeing until its decline.
Conclusion: this research demonstrates that wellbeing and burnout have only a moderate negative correlation when using commonly employed measurement tools. Therefore, measures of burnout are not a surrogate for wellbeing. Further research could adopt a salutogenic approach by using the WEMWBS to monitor doctors’ wellbeing and could explore interventions to increase well-being, rather than waiting for its decline.
Text
a-national-cross-sectional-survey-and-interviews-exploring-the-relationship-between-well-being-and-burnout-in-doctors
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 9 June 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 451272
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451272
ISSN: 2056-4724
PURE UUID: bf8a7914-1f81-4107-8138-458971d32dfd
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 Sep 2021 16:30
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Emma Boxley
Author:
John Jenkins
Author:
Gemma Simons
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics