The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Seismic vulnerability assessment of precast post-tensioned segmental bridge piers subject to far-fault ground motions

Seismic vulnerability assessment of precast post-tensioned segmental bridge piers subject to far-fault ground motions
Seismic vulnerability assessment of precast post-tensioned segmental bridge piers subject to far-fault ground motions
Precast post-tensioned segmental (PPS) bridge piers mitigate global and local damages of bridge structures through natural hinges (joints between their segments) and rocking motion of their segments. The application of the PPS piers is currently growing in Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) where the segments are manufactured offsite with higher quality, and are assembled onsite in a short time. Structural vulnerability analysis of the PPS piers is very essential in extending their engineering implementation under seismic loading. Thus, this work particularly focuses on seismic vulnerability assessment of the PPS piers. To achieve this goal, a previously developed and experimentally validated robust Finite Element model of the PPS piers in OpenSees programme is used to analyse PPS piers of various aspect ratios. An equivalent reinforced concrete (RC) pier to one of the PPS piers is also analysed. Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is performed and fragility curves are generated to evaluate seismic performance of the PPS piers and an equivalent RC pier using a suite of 44 far-fault ground motions. The IDA results show that slenderising the PPS pier tends to change the failure criterion from the yielding of the post-tensioning tendon to the strength loss of the pier. For squat and slender piers, the yielding of the tendon governs the failure of the pier while the strength of very slender PPS piers drops due to second-order effects at small drift values prior to the yielding of the post-tensioning tendon. It is also found from fragility curves that squat piers are more prone to seismic collapse compared to slender piers. The equivalent RC pier reaches slight and medium damage states in lower intensity measures compared to the PPS pier.
Accelerated bridge construction, Far-fault ground motions, Incremental dynamic analysis, Precast post-tensioned segmental columns, Seismic performance assessment
2352-0124
2566-2579
Ahmadi, Ehsan
f1994ae0-2b3e-43c9-a595-032e801aae70
Kashani, Mohammad
d1074b3a-5853-4eb5-a4ef-7d741b1c025d
Ahmadi, Ehsan
f1994ae0-2b3e-43c9-a595-032e801aae70
Kashani, Mohammad
d1074b3a-5853-4eb5-a4ef-7d741b1c025d

Ahmadi, Ehsan and Kashani, Mohammad (2021) Seismic vulnerability assessment of precast post-tensioned segmental bridge piers subject to far-fault ground motions. Structures, 34, 2566-2579. (doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.041).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Precast post-tensioned segmental (PPS) bridge piers mitigate global and local damages of bridge structures through natural hinges (joints between their segments) and rocking motion of their segments. The application of the PPS piers is currently growing in Accelerated Bridge Construction (ABC) where the segments are manufactured offsite with higher quality, and are assembled onsite in a short time. Structural vulnerability analysis of the PPS piers is very essential in extending their engineering implementation under seismic loading. Thus, this work particularly focuses on seismic vulnerability assessment of the PPS piers. To achieve this goal, a previously developed and experimentally validated robust Finite Element model of the PPS piers in OpenSees programme is used to analyse PPS piers of various aspect ratios. An equivalent reinforced concrete (RC) pier to one of the PPS piers is also analysed. Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) is performed and fragility curves are generated to evaluate seismic performance of the PPS piers and an equivalent RC pier using a suite of 44 far-fault ground motions. The IDA results show that slenderising the PPS pier tends to change the failure criterion from the yielding of the post-tensioning tendon to the strength loss of the pier. For squat and slender piers, the yielding of the tendon governs the failure of the pier while the strength of very slender PPS piers drops due to second-order effects at small drift values prior to the yielding of the post-tensioning tendon. It is also found from fragility curves that squat piers are more prone to seismic collapse compared to slender piers. The equivalent RC pier reaches slight and medium damage states in lower intensity measures compared to the PPS pier.

Text
Ahmadi & Kashani_Accepted_Manuscript - Accepted Manuscript
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: December 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: The authors acknowledge the support received by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for a Prosperous Nation [grant number EP/R039178/1 ] : SPINE: Resilience-Based Design of Biologically Inspired Columns for Next-Generation Accelerated Bridge Construction ]. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Keywords: Accelerated bridge construction, Far-fault ground motions, Incremental dynamic analysis, Precast post-tensioned segmental columns, Seismic performance assessment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 451505
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451505
ISSN: 2352-0124
PURE UUID: 038e1249-3559-49cf-b97e-9f06f097c146
ORCID for Mohammad Kashani: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0008-0007

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Oct 2021 16:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:46

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×