The effect of wearing an anti-flash hood on the noise attenuation of earmuffs
The effect of wearing an anti-flash hood on the noise attenuation of earmuffs
The insertion losses of four pairs of earmuffs, including one noise-excluding headset, were measured in one-third octave bands in a diffuse broadband noise field using a head-like acoustic test fixture. The acoustic test fixture contained realistic ear simulators with microphones at the eardrum positions. The insertion losses were measured (i) with the earmuffs on their own, (ii) with the earmuffs worn over an anti-flash hood, and (iii) for one earmuff, with the earmuff worn under the hood. The other three earmuffs could not be fitted under the hood. The insertion loss of the anti-flash hood on its own was also measured. Wearing an anti-flash hood under the earmuffs greatly reduced the protection against noise, by 20–23 dB at high frequencies, by 17–20 dB at middle frequencies, by 12–16 dB at low frequencies, and by 16–20 dB overall. Only one earmuff was slim enough to fit under an anti-flash hood. Wearing an anti-flash hood over this earmuff had only a marginal effect on the earmuff insertion loss, of the order of 1 dB. If anti-flash hoods could be designed to fit over other types of earmuffs and headsets, the protection of these earmuffs and headsets would be virtually maintained.
Anti-flash hoods, Earmuffs, Hearing protection, Hoods, Insertion loss, Sound attenuation
204-219
Paddan, Gurmail S
d019df32-1de8-4ecf-976e-61791661ef13
Lower, Michael C
301d090f-87a2-488f-81e4-7b2a6756e5d8
9 September 2021
Paddan, Gurmail S
d019df32-1de8-4ecf-976e-61791661ef13
Lower, Michael C
301d090f-87a2-488f-81e4-7b2a6756e5d8
Paddan, Gurmail S and Lower, Michael C
(2021)
The effect of wearing an anti-flash hood on the noise attenuation of earmuffs.
Industrial Health, 59 (4), .
(doi:10.2486/indhealth.2020-0103).
Abstract
The insertion losses of four pairs of earmuffs, including one noise-excluding headset, were measured in one-third octave bands in a diffuse broadband noise field using a head-like acoustic test fixture. The acoustic test fixture contained realistic ear simulators with microphones at the eardrum positions. The insertion losses were measured (i) with the earmuffs on their own, (ii) with the earmuffs worn over an anti-flash hood, and (iii) for one earmuff, with the earmuff worn under the hood. The other three earmuffs could not be fitted under the hood. The insertion loss of the anti-flash hood on its own was also measured. Wearing an anti-flash hood under the earmuffs greatly reduced the protection against noise, by 20–23 dB at high frequencies, by 17–20 dB at middle frequencies, by 12–16 dB at low frequencies, and by 16–20 dB overall. Only one earmuff was slim enough to fit under an anti-flash hood. Wearing an anti-flash hood over this earmuff had only a marginal effect on the earmuff insertion loss, of the order of 1 dB. If anti-flash hoods could be designed to fit over other types of earmuffs and headsets, the protection of these earmuffs and headsets would be virtually maintained.
Text
59_2020-0103
- Accepted Manuscript
Text
59_2020-0103
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 2 March 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 11 March 2021
Published date: 9 September 2021
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health.
Keywords:
Anti-flash hoods, Earmuffs, Hearing protection, Hoods, Insertion loss, Sound attenuation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 451514
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451514
ISSN: 0019-8366
PURE UUID: 0463ad16-72fe-41fe-b5ee-4d9b32b99482
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 05 Oct 2021 16:31
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 13:57
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Gurmail S Paddan
Author:
Michael C Lower
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics