The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe: a systematic review

Determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe: a systematic review
Determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe: a systematic review
Background: Pregnant women are at high risk for severe influenza. However, maternal influenza vaccination uptake in most World Health Organization (WHO) European Region countries remains low, despite the presence of widespread national recommendations. An influenza vaccination reduces influenza-associated morbidity and mortality in pregnancy, as well as providing newborns with protection in their first months. Potential determinants of vaccine hesitancy need to be identified to develop strategies that can increase vaccine acceptance and uptake among pregnant women. The primary objective of the systematic review is to identify the individual determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe, and how to overcome the hesitancy.

Methods: Databases were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative and quantitative studies published between 2009 and 2019 inclusive. Databases included PubMed via MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, SAGE Journals, Taylor and Francis and Springer nature. These covered themes including psychology, medicine, and public health. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, 11 studies were eligible and analyzed for significant determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe.

Results: The most commonly reported factors were psychological aspects, for example concerns about safety and risks to mother and child, or general low risk perception of becoming ill from influenza. Doubts about the effectiveness of the vaccine and a lack of knowledge about this topic were further factors. There was also influence of contextual factors, such as healthcare workers not providing adequate knowledge about the influenza vaccine or the pregnant lady stating their antivaccine sentiment.

Conclusion: Health promotion that specifically increases knowledge among pregnant women about influenza and vaccination is important, supporting a valid risk judgment by the pregnant lady. The development of new information strategies for dialogue between healthcare providers and pregnant women should form part of this strategy.
Europe, Infectious diseases, Influenza, Maternal, Pregnant women, Review, Vaccination, Vaccine delay, Vaccine hesitancy, Vaccine refusal
0949-2321
116
Adeyanju, Gbadebo Collins
8c1f3e0f-2f2b-4410-8db1-210787105a4c
Engel, Elena
ad95207a-a423-462f-a8df-87bd2d94fec5
Koch, Laura
422f2d71-e3b0-47b9-856d-fedf89eee2c6
Ranzinger, Tabea
5197e395-c202-4cb4-a0f5-f021a11421f2
Shahid, Imtiaz Bin Mohammed
a5b506e1-445b-428f-8a91-fbb73776fed4
Head, Michael G.
67ce0afc-2fc3-47f4-acf2-8794d27ce69c
Eitze, Sarah
c721b4e6-78e8-4ba9-a0d3-98fdf2a16ec9
Betsch, Cornelia
e955a611-df7a-45a0-b189-0557566fd224
Adeyanju, Gbadebo Collins
8c1f3e0f-2f2b-4410-8db1-210787105a4c
Engel, Elena
ad95207a-a423-462f-a8df-87bd2d94fec5
Koch, Laura
422f2d71-e3b0-47b9-856d-fedf89eee2c6
Ranzinger, Tabea
5197e395-c202-4cb4-a0f5-f021a11421f2
Shahid, Imtiaz Bin Mohammed
a5b506e1-445b-428f-8a91-fbb73776fed4
Head, Michael G.
67ce0afc-2fc3-47f4-acf2-8794d27ce69c
Eitze, Sarah
c721b4e6-78e8-4ba9-a0d3-98fdf2a16ec9
Betsch, Cornelia
e955a611-df7a-45a0-b189-0557566fd224

Adeyanju, Gbadebo Collins, Engel, Elena, Koch, Laura, Ranzinger, Tabea, Shahid, Imtiaz Bin Mohammed, Head, Michael G., Eitze, Sarah and Betsch, Cornelia (2021) Determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe: a systematic review. European Journal of Medical Research, 26 (1), 116, [116]. (doi:10.1186/s40001-021-00584-w).

Record type: Review

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women are at high risk for severe influenza. However, maternal influenza vaccination uptake in most World Health Organization (WHO) European Region countries remains low, despite the presence of widespread national recommendations. An influenza vaccination reduces influenza-associated morbidity and mortality in pregnancy, as well as providing newborns with protection in their first months. Potential determinants of vaccine hesitancy need to be identified to develop strategies that can increase vaccine acceptance and uptake among pregnant women. The primary objective of the systematic review is to identify the individual determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe, and how to overcome the hesitancy.

Methods: Databases were searched for peer-reviewed qualitative and quantitative studies published between 2009 and 2019 inclusive. Databases included PubMed via MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, SAGE Journals, Taylor and Francis and Springer nature. These covered themes including psychology, medicine, and public health. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, 11 studies were eligible and analyzed for significant determinants of influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe.

Results: The most commonly reported factors were psychological aspects, for example concerns about safety and risks to mother and child, or general low risk perception of becoming ill from influenza. Doubts about the effectiveness of the vaccine and a lack of knowledge about this topic were further factors. There was also influence of contextual factors, such as healthcare workers not providing adequate knowledge about the influenza vaccine or the pregnant lady stating their antivaccine sentiment.

Conclusion: Health promotion that specifically increases knowledge among pregnant women about influenza and vaccination is important, supporting a valid risk judgment by the pregnant lady. The development of new information strategies for dialogue between healthcare providers and pregnant women should form part of this strategy.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 12 September 2021
Published date: 28 September 2021
Additional Information: © 2021. The Author(s).
Keywords: Europe, Infectious diseases, Influenza, Maternal, Pregnant women, Review, Vaccination, Vaccine delay, Vaccine hesitancy, Vaccine refusal

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 451630
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451630
ISSN: 0949-2321
PURE UUID: f2334b32-2cb0-42eb-b642-105666e300a4
ORCID for Michael G. Head: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1189-0531

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Oct 2021 16:31
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 01:54

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Gbadebo Collins Adeyanju
Author: Elena Engel
Author: Laura Koch
Author: Tabea Ranzinger
Author: Imtiaz Bin Mohammed Shahid
Author: Michael G. Head ORCID iD
Author: Sarah Eitze
Author: Cornelia Betsch

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×