The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparing Cabinets: The dilemmas of collective government

Comparing Cabinets: The dilemmas of collective government
Comparing Cabinets: The dilemmas of collective government
Why is cabinet government so resilient? Despite many obituaries, why does it continue to be the vehicle for governing across most parliamentary systems? This book answers these questions by examining the structure and performance of cabinet government in five democracies: the United Kingdom, Denmark, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Australia.The book is organised around the dilemmas that cabinet governments must solve.
how to develop the formal rules and practices that can bring predictability to the daily business and allow consistent decision making;
how to balance good policy with good politics;
how to ensure cohesion between the factions and parties that constitute the cabinet while allowing levels of self interest to be advanced;
how leaders can balance persuasion and command;
how to maintain support through accountability at the same time as being able to make unpopular decisions.

All these dilemmas are continuing challenges to cabinet government, never solvable, constantly reappearing in different forms. We ask how traditions, beliefs and practices shape the answers. Two of the countries are Westminster systems, albeit now with different practices. Two are European governments where proportional representation ensures that single-party governments are rare and coalitions need to be negotiated and maintained. One is a system where all the major parties are represented in the federal council and where every item must be negotiated because there is no collation agreement.The different practices show there can be no single definition of cabinet government. Rather, there are arenas and shared practices such as collective responsibility that provide some cohesion. The traditions and practices shape the direction but do not dictate what should be done. The comparison puts each of the individual cabinet systems into clearer perspective. There are always other ways of solving what at first sight might appear intractable. The book used its comparative approach to provide analysis and insights into the process of cabinet government that cannot be achieved in the study of any single political system. We better understand the pressures on each system by appreciating the options that are elsewhere accepted as common beliefs.
Cabinet, prime ministers, Collective Responsibility, Australia, Britain, The Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Traditions, Dilemmas
Oxford University Press
Grube, Dennis
1685e2fb-c018-4b06-85c8-c8c85f3c366d
Weller, Patrick
bb6df6ad-a40a-4c62-a01f-84453db0b1b5
Rhodes, R. A. W.
cdbfb699-ba1a-4ff0-ba2c-060626f72948
Grube, Dennis
1685e2fb-c018-4b06-85c8-c8c85f3c366d
Weller, Patrick
bb6df6ad-a40a-4c62-a01f-84453db0b1b5
Rhodes, R. A. W.
cdbfb699-ba1a-4ff0-ba2c-060626f72948

Grube, Dennis, Weller, Patrick and Rhodes, R. A. W. (2021) Comparing Cabinets: The dilemmas of collective government , First ed. Oxford University Press, 258pp.

Record type: Book

Abstract

Why is cabinet government so resilient? Despite many obituaries, why does it continue to be the vehicle for governing across most parliamentary systems? This book answers these questions by examining the structure and performance of cabinet government in five democracies: the United Kingdom, Denmark, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Australia.The book is organised around the dilemmas that cabinet governments must solve.
how to develop the formal rules and practices that can bring predictability to the daily business and allow consistent decision making;
how to balance good policy with good politics;
how to ensure cohesion between the factions and parties that constitute the cabinet while allowing levels of self interest to be advanced;
how leaders can balance persuasion and command;
how to maintain support through accountability at the same time as being able to make unpopular decisions.

All these dilemmas are continuing challenges to cabinet government, never solvable, constantly reappearing in different forms. We ask how traditions, beliefs and practices shape the answers. Two of the countries are Westminster systems, albeit now with different practices. Two are European governments where proportional representation ensures that single-party governments are rare and coalitions need to be negotiated and maintained. One is a system where all the major parties are represented in the federal council and where every item must be negotiated because there is no collation agreement.The different practices show there can be no single definition of cabinet government. Rather, there are arenas and shared practices such as collective responsibility that provide some cohesion. The traditions and practices shape the direction but do not dictate what should be done. The comparison puts each of the individual cabinet systems into clearer perspective. There are always other ways of solving what at first sight might appear intractable. The book used its comparative approach to provide analysis and insights into the process of cabinet government that cannot be achieved in the study of any single political system. We better understand the pressures on each system by appreciating the options that are elsewhere accepted as common beliefs.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2021
Keywords: Cabinet, prime ministers, Collective Responsibility, Australia, Britain, The Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Traditions, Dilemmas

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 451702
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451702
PURE UUID: 8398ca4d-2704-4c54-a952-17692d766036
ORCID for R. A. W. Rhodes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1886-2392

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Oct 2021 16:35
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:27

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dennis Grube
Author: Patrick Weller
Author: R. A. W. Rhodes ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×