The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Professional development int he use of discussion and argument in secondary school science departments

Professional development int he use of discussion and argument in secondary school science departments
Professional development int he use of discussion and argument in secondary school science departments
To establish a curriculum which foregrounds the epistemic aspects of science requires a pedagogy that promotes a dialogic approach to the evaluation of evidence and arguments for scientific ideas. Such an approach, where students and teachers address learning tasks together, listen to each other and consider alternative viewpoints, is not the most familiar or comfortable for many secondary science teachers. Moreover it can pose a significant challenge to their teaching of science. Informed by previous research on the conditions for teachers’ professional learning, this research focuses on the development of dialogic practice in four secondary school science departments. Two lead teachers from each school attended a professional development programme introducing a theoretical rationale and pedagogical approach for dialogic teaching. These lead teachers subsequently introduced activities and resources in their curricula and held meetings with colleagues to share their practice and
collaboratively reflect on their experiences. Interviews, observations of lessons, and recordings of reflective meetings provide data sources for qualitative analysis from which narratives of development in each community of practice are drawn. The perspectives of teaching and learning science held by lead teachers, their school structures and colleagues’ existing practices determine different approaches for establishing sustained change.
Simon, Shirley
aca170d1-0da1-493b-9537-06b9a76f13c2
Christodoulou, Andri
0a97820c-7e87-45d6-827a-d72fa1734d0a
Howell-Richardson, Christina
1ddc4f61-38c2-4667-84cc-89a32b49e2b5
Osborne, Jonathan
15b1de29-6239-42c4-b0dc-426450721b9a
Richardson, Katherine
1fde79d9-882d-498b-9227-8c5535b84408
Simon, Shirley
aca170d1-0da1-493b-9537-06b9a76f13c2
Christodoulou, Andri
0a97820c-7e87-45d6-827a-d72fa1734d0a
Howell-Richardson, Christina
1ddc4f61-38c2-4667-84cc-89a32b49e2b5
Osborne, Jonathan
15b1de29-6239-42c4-b0dc-426450721b9a
Richardson, Katherine
1fde79d9-882d-498b-9227-8c5535b84408

Simon, Shirley, Christodoulou, Andri, Howell-Richardson, Christina, Osborne, Jonathan and Richardson, Katherine (2009) Professional development int he use of discussion and argument in secondary school science departments. ESERA, , Helsinki, Finland. 31 Aug - 04 Sep 2015. 1 pp .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

To establish a curriculum which foregrounds the epistemic aspects of science requires a pedagogy that promotes a dialogic approach to the evaluation of evidence and arguments for scientific ideas. Such an approach, where students and teachers address learning tasks together, listen to each other and consider alternative viewpoints, is not the most familiar or comfortable for many secondary science teachers. Moreover it can pose a significant challenge to their teaching of science. Informed by previous research on the conditions for teachers’ professional learning, this research focuses on the development of dialogic practice in four secondary school science departments. Two lead teachers from each school attended a professional development programme introducing a theoretical rationale and pedagogical approach for dialogic teaching. These lead teachers subsequently introduced activities and resources in their curricula and held meetings with colleagues to share their practice and
collaboratively reflect on their experiences. Interviews, observations of lessons, and recordings of reflective meetings provide data sources for qualitative analysis from which narratives of development in each community of practice are drawn. The perspectives of teaching and learning science held by lead teachers, their school structures and colleagues’ existing practices determine different approaches for establishing sustained change.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 31 August 2009
Venue - Dates: ESERA, , Helsinki, Finland, 2015-08-31 - 2015-09-04

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 451827
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451827
PURE UUID: 9a425d0f-bf01-436f-8fef-7b968bd3e092
ORCID for Andri Christodoulou: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-4210

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Oct 2021 16:36
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:26

Export record

Contributors

Author: Shirley Simon
Author: Christina Howell-Richardson
Author: Jonathan Osborne
Author: Katherine Richardson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×