The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mapping controversies: a pedagogical approach for communicatng about socioscientific issues

Mapping controversies: a pedagogical approach for communicatng about socioscientific issues
Mapping controversies: a pedagogical approach for communicatng about socioscientific issues
The aim of this study was to investigate how a pedagogical approach designed to promote productive discourse and undistorted communication (Habermas, 1984) can enable secondary school students to communicate about socioscientific issues (SSIs). A small-scale qualitative study design was employed to explore how a group of 13 Biology school students communicated about the badger – cattle controversy in the UK and the types of knowledge they use in this process. A pedagogical approach based on mapping controversies in combination with asynchronous online communication was designed and implemented across 3 lessons in order to facilitate the communication process amongst the students. The approach followed three stages: (a) familiarisation stage where mapping controversies was used as a tool for students to explore their knowledge, ideas and positioning in relation to the SSI, (b) exploration stage where students engaged in an asynchronous online exchange (blog) to discuss the issue and identify solutions, and (c) consolidation stage, where mapping controversies was again utilised, as a way to establish student knowledge and understanding. Our findings suggest that the approach was effective. The maps during the consolidation phase were conceptually different, showing that students had a more developed understanding of the complexity of the SSI. The themes found during the consolidation phase where extensively discussed during the exploration phrase. Students’ exploration of the issue during the online exchange allowed them to elaborate on their views and thinking, to question each other, and to draw on a range of knowledge types in their attempt to decide what should be done about the controversy. Implications for classroom practice and teacher education are discussed.
socioscientific issues, secondary school, teaching learning sequences
Christodoulou, Andri
0a97820c-7e87-45d6-827a-d72fa1734d0a
Grace, Marcus
bb019e62-4134-4f74-9e2c-d235a6f89b97
Levinson, Ralph
f36122a4-e28c-450a-87d7-c641185560b6
Rietdijk, Willeke
0edd8cf8-a325-43d0-9b08-2268c9e7b7f4
Christodoulou, Andri
0a97820c-7e87-45d6-827a-d72fa1734d0a
Grace, Marcus
bb019e62-4134-4f74-9e2c-d235a6f89b97
Levinson, Ralph
f36122a4-e28c-450a-87d7-c641185560b6
Rietdijk, Willeke
0edd8cf8-a325-43d0-9b08-2268c9e7b7f4

Christodoulou, Andri, Grace, Marcus, Levinson, Ralph and Rietdijk, Willeke (2017) Mapping controversies: a pedagogical approach for communicatng about socioscientific issues. European Science Education Research Association 2017, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland. 21 - 25 Aug 2017.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how a pedagogical approach designed to promote productive discourse and undistorted communication (Habermas, 1984) can enable secondary school students to communicate about socioscientific issues (SSIs). A small-scale qualitative study design was employed to explore how a group of 13 Biology school students communicated about the badger – cattle controversy in the UK and the types of knowledge they use in this process. A pedagogical approach based on mapping controversies in combination with asynchronous online communication was designed and implemented across 3 lessons in order to facilitate the communication process amongst the students. The approach followed three stages: (a) familiarisation stage where mapping controversies was used as a tool for students to explore their knowledge, ideas and positioning in relation to the SSI, (b) exploration stage where students engaged in an asynchronous online exchange (blog) to discuss the issue and identify solutions, and (c) consolidation stage, where mapping controversies was again utilised, as a way to establish student knowledge and understanding. Our findings suggest that the approach was effective. The maps during the consolidation phase were conceptually different, showing that students had a more developed understanding of the complexity of the SSI. The themes found during the consolidation phase where extensively discussed during the exploration phrase. Students’ exploration of the issue during the online exchange allowed them to elaborate on their views and thinking, to question each other, and to draw on a range of knowledge types in their attempt to decide what should be done about the controversy. Implications for classroom practice and teacher education are discussed.

Text
poster_ESERA 2017 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: 21 August 2017
Venue - Dates: European Science Education Research Association 2017, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland, 2017-08-21 - 2017-08-25
Keywords: socioscientific issues, secondary school, teaching learning sequences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 451853
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/451853
PURE UUID: 34e0c8e8-c4b3-45de-858e-685d753b9564
ORCID for Andri Christodoulou: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7021-4210
ORCID for Marcus Grace: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-1765

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Nov 2021 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:26

Export record

Contributors

Author: Marcus Grace ORCID iD
Author: Ralph Levinson
Author: Willeke Rietdijk

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×