The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Combining evidence for and against pathogenicity for variants in cancer susceptibility genes: CanVIG-UK consensus recommendations

Combining evidence for and against pathogenicity for variants in cancer susceptibility genes: CanVIG-UK consensus recommendations
Combining evidence for and against pathogenicity for variants in cancer susceptibility genes: CanVIG-UK consensus recommendations

Accurate classification of variants in cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) is key for correct estimation of cancer risk and management of patients. Consistency in the weighting assigned to individual elements of evidence has been much improved by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) 2015 framework for variant classification, UK Association for Clinical Genomic Science (UK-ACGS) Best Practice Guidelines and subsequent Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK) consensus specification for CSGs. However, considerable inconsistency persists regarding practice in the combination of evidence elements. CanVIG-UK is a national subspecialist multidisciplinary network for cancer susceptibility genomic variant interpretation, comprising clinical scientist and clinical geneticist representation from each of the 25 diagnostic laboratories/clinical genetic units across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Here, we summarise the aggregated evidence elements and combinations possible within different variant classification schemata currently employed for CSGs (ACMG, UK-ACGS, CanVIG-UK and ClinGen gene-specific guidance for PTEN, TP53 and CDH1). We present consensus recommendations from CanVIG-UK regarding (1) consistent scoring for combinations of evidence elements using a validated numerical 'exponent score' (2) new combinations of evidence elements constituting likely pathogenic' and 'pathogenic' classification categories, (3) which evidence elements can and cannot be used in combination for specific variant types and (4) classification of variants for which there are evidence elements for both pathogenicity and benignity.

genetic testing, genetic variation, genetics, genomics, medical
0022-2593
Garrett, Alice
d8fcdea3-8231-4d5e-8ada-4f932ca1a0c3
Durkie, Miranda
7caca497-e12f-4f13-99e0-f40e767f0163
Callaway, Alison
07ee9b43-9249-4a56-9582-4dc41d613101
Burghel, George J.
9f2ea756-eaac-42a6-a059-68de98809d5e
Robinson, Rachel
b81f9f32-b468-451d-959b-355aa680f7fb
Drummond, James
ca25d121-4209-4d43-9727-bc29a050a148
Torr, Bethany
9c90bac1-5d8a-4f91-81a1-6429ddc5f037
Cubuk, Cankut
9a916072-4100-4c45-ab8e-8a67cf6e2170
Berry, Ian R.
b720cb74-2247-4906-8c4e-9bde4742b772
Wallace, Andrew J.
31501286-9c2e-4c8e-9985-cc2244c26249
Ellard, Sian
6c9b0ede-8980-4602-b063-444b165baa09
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Tischkowitz, Marc
1e7750c2-91a5-4079-a1f0-f59a1f42405b
Hanson, Helen
fe4a8065-8b0d-4b30-a658-cd433570c2ec
Turnbull, Clare
63408861-754b-4f55-a010-29d1bea914e2
Garrett, Alice
d8fcdea3-8231-4d5e-8ada-4f932ca1a0c3
Durkie, Miranda
7caca497-e12f-4f13-99e0-f40e767f0163
Callaway, Alison
07ee9b43-9249-4a56-9582-4dc41d613101
Burghel, George J.
9f2ea756-eaac-42a6-a059-68de98809d5e
Robinson, Rachel
b81f9f32-b468-451d-959b-355aa680f7fb
Drummond, James
ca25d121-4209-4d43-9727-bc29a050a148
Torr, Bethany
9c90bac1-5d8a-4f91-81a1-6429ddc5f037
Cubuk, Cankut
9a916072-4100-4c45-ab8e-8a67cf6e2170
Berry, Ian R.
b720cb74-2247-4906-8c4e-9bde4742b772
Wallace, Andrew J.
31501286-9c2e-4c8e-9985-cc2244c26249
Ellard, Sian
6c9b0ede-8980-4602-b063-444b165baa09
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Tischkowitz, Marc
1e7750c2-91a5-4079-a1f0-f59a1f42405b
Hanson, Helen
fe4a8065-8b0d-4b30-a658-cd433570c2ec
Turnbull, Clare
63408861-754b-4f55-a010-29d1bea914e2

Garrett, Alice, Durkie, Miranda, Callaway, Alison, Burghel, George J., Robinson, Rachel, Drummond, James, Torr, Bethany, Cubuk, Cankut, Berry, Ian R., Wallace, Andrew J., Ellard, Sian, Eccles, Diana M., Tischkowitz, Marc, Hanson, Helen and Turnbull, Clare (2020) Combining evidence for and against pathogenicity for variants in cancer susceptibility genes: CanVIG-UK consensus recommendations. Journal of Medical Genetics, [107248]. (doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107248).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Accurate classification of variants in cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) is key for correct estimation of cancer risk and management of patients. Consistency in the weighting assigned to individual elements of evidence has been much improved by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) 2015 framework for variant classification, UK Association for Clinical Genomic Science (UK-ACGS) Best Practice Guidelines and subsequent Cancer Variant Interpretation Group UK (CanVIG-UK) consensus specification for CSGs. However, considerable inconsistency persists regarding practice in the combination of evidence elements. CanVIG-UK is a national subspecialist multidisciplinary network for cancer susceptibility genomic variant interpretation, comprising clinical scientist and clinical geneticist representation from each of the 25 diagnostic laboratories/clinical genetic units across the UK and Republic of Ireland. Here, we summarise the aggregated evidence elements and combinations possible within different variant classification schemata currently employed for CSGs (ACMG, UK-ACGS, CanVIG-UK and ClinGen gene-specific guidance for PTEN, TP53 and CDH1). We present consensus recommendations from CanVIG-UK regarding (1) consistent scoring for combinations of evidence elements using a validated numerical 'exponent score' (2) new combinations of evidence elements constituting likely pathogenic' and 'pathogenic' classification categories, (3) which evidence elements can and cannot be used in combination for specific variant types and (4) classification of variants for which there are evidence elements for both pathogenicity and benignity.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 13 August 2020
e-pub ahead of print date: 18 November 2020
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Keywords: genetic testing, genetic variation, genetics, genomics, medical

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452134
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452134
ISSN: 0022-2593
PURE UUID: a599985a-0375-4d32-b50d-3c0afbbac233
ORCID for Diana M. Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 25 Nov 2021 17:55
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:36

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alice Garrett
Author: Miranda Durkie
Author: Alison Callaway
Author: George J. Burghel
Author: Rachel Robinson
Author: James Drummond
Author: Bethany Torr
Author: Cankut Cubuk
Author: Ian R. Berry
Author: Andrew J. Wallace
Author: Sian Ellard
Author: Diana M. Eccles ORCID iD
Author: Marc Tischkowitz
Author: Helen Hanson
Author: Clare Turnbull

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×