The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Unusual experiences and their association with metacognition: investigating ASMR and Tulpamancy

Unusual experiences and their association with metacognition: investigating ASMR and Tulpamancy
Unusual experiences and their association with metacognition: investigating ASMR and Tulpamancy
Background: Unusual experiences in Tulpamancer and Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR) communities are generally positive and sought after, unlike hallucinations and delusions in clinical populations. Metacognition, the ability to reflect on self-referential experiences, may aid sense-making around unusual experiences, reducing distress. This study investigated group differences in hallucination-proneness, delusion-proneness, and metacognition in these communities compared to controls, and whether metacognition predicted unusual experiences.

Methods: 243 participants reporting ASMR, Tulpamancy, or neither, with no history of psychosis, took part in an online observational study. Participants completed the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, Metacognitions Questionnaire-30, and Brief Core Schema Scales to capture metacognition. A Tulpamancer+ (reporting ASMR) group was identified and included in analyses. ANCOVAs highlighted group differences in hallucination-proneness, with Tulpamancer+ scoring higher, and metacognitive beliefs, with Tulpamancers reporting lower metacognitive belief endorsement. There were no group differences in delusion-proneness, self-reflection, or self-schemas. Stepwise regression demonstrated metacognition does influence unusual experiences in the non-clinical population, and this influence varies across groups.

Conclusions: In non-clinical populations, unusual sensory experiences are not associated with increased metacognitive beliefs, but having multiple unusual experiences is associated with higher hallucination-proneness.

Results suggest improving metacognition in clinical groups may help reduce distress related to unusual sensory experiences.
metacognitive beliefs, self-reflection, self-schema, hallucinations, delusion-proneness, ASMR, Tulpamancy
1354-6805
Palmer-Cooper, Emma Claire
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
McGuire, Nicola
953b34ad-b156-4de9-8e49-6789f85fe14c
Wright, Abigail Christine
03f51f82-44aa-425d-bc9c-0097228bd1a7
Palmer-Cooper, Emma Claire
e96e8cb6-2221-4dc7-b556-603f2cf6b086
McGuire, Nicola
953b34ad-b156-4de9-8e49-6789f85fe14c
Wright, Abigail Christine
03f51f82-44aa-425d-bc9c-0097228bd1a7

Palmer-Cooper, Emma Claire, McGuire, Nicola and Wright, Abigail Christine (2021) Unusual experiences and their association with metacognition: investigating ASMR and Tulpamancy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry. (doi:10.31234/osf.io/mskhp).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Unusual experiences in Tulpamancer and Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR) communities are generally positive and sought after, unlike hallucinations and delusions in clinical populations. Metacognition, the ability to reflect on self-referential experiences, may aid sense-making around unusual experiences, reducing distress. This study investigated group differences in hallucination-proneness, delusion-proneness, and metacognition in these communities compared to controls, and whether metacognition predicted unusual experiences.

Methods: 243 participants reporting ASMR, Tulpamancy, or neither, with no history of psychosis, took part in an online observational study. Participants completed the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, Metacognitions Questionnaire-30, and Brief Core Schema Scales to capture metacognition. A Tulpamancer+ (reporting ASMR) group was identified and included in analyses. ANCOVAs highlighted group differences in hallucination-proneness, with Tulpamancer+ scoring higher, and metacognitive beliefs, with Tulpamancers reporting lower metacognitive belief endorsement. There were no group differences in delusion-proneness, self-reflection, or self-schemas. Stepwise regression demonstrated metacognition does influence unusual experiences in the non-clinical population, and this influence varies across groups.

Conclusions: In non-clinical populations, unusual sensory experiences are not associated with increased metacognitive beliefs, but having multiple unusual experiences is associated with higher hallucination-proneness.

Results suggest improving metacognition in clinical groups may help reduce distress related to unusual sensory experiences.

Text
13546805.2021 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (2MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 October 2021
Published date: 8 November 2021
Keywords: metacognitive beliefs, self-reflection, self-schema, hallucinations, delusion-proneness, ASMR, Tulpamancy

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452181
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452181
ISSN: 1354-6805
PURE UUID: 97449e3e-9309-48ed-b75d-d09e5e7daf4f
ORCID for Emma Claire Palmer-Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5416-1518

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Nov 2021 17:31
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Nicola McGuire
Author: Abigail Christine Wright

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×