The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Auditory Brainstem Response elicited by CE chirps and an investigation of their time-frequency properties

Auditory Brainstem Response elicited by CE chirps and an investigation of their time-frequency properties
Auditory Brainstem Response elicited by CE chirps and an investigation of their time-frequency properties
Chirps are a family of stimuli designed to provide enhanced neural synchronicity and hence improve ABR amplitudes. It is known that NB CE chirps can achieve greater wave V amplitude waveforms compared to the traditional tone pip (Ferm et al 2013, 2015; Rodrigues et al 2013; Cobb et al 2016). However, it is unclear whether this is due to the wider bandwidth of the NB CE chirp or the frequency-delay characteristics of the stimuli. The aim of this study was to evaluate CE chirps and investigate their time-frequency properties in three ways: 1. comparing the acoustic spectrum of the NB CE chirps with traditional tone pips 2. analysing the time-frequency properties of the NB CE chirps through spectrograms and 3. measurement of wave V amplitudes stimulated by forward and reverse CE chirps.

The acoustical spectral bandwidth for CE chirp stimuli and Blackman-gated tone pips were compared at 500 Hz and 4 kHz. The 500 Hz CE chirp was 43% wider than the 500 Hz tone pip and the 4 kHz CE chirp was 40% wider than the 4 kHz tone pip. The widened acoustic spectra for the NB CE chirp could be a contributing factor to the increased wave V amplitude shown for NB CE chirps over tone pips in clinical practice.

Spectrograms were generated to assess the time-frequency properties of the chirp that should show a nonlinearly sweep in time from low to high frequency compared to a time reversed chirp that should show the opposite. This frequency sweep appears clear for 4 kHz and 2 kHz NB CE chirps, 1 kHz NB CE chirp frequency sweep appears to be on the limit of being resolved and the 500 Hz CE chirp sweep could not be resolved by spectrogram analysis. The stimuli were also tested in an auditory nerve model. From the model outputs it appears that the lowest frequency chirps may not be well resolved by the auditory system.

An issue with producing effective band limited chirps is that the short stimulus must be frequency specific but still follow the frequency-delay function of the cochlea by sweeping in frequency over time. Dau (2000) and Petoe (2010) both showed that a time reversed broadband chirp produces a smaller wave V ABR response compared to a forward broadband chirp, therefore showing that the time-frequency properties of broadband chirp can be resolved by the cochlea. With the NB CE chirps we may be near the limit of time-frequency resolution but a comparison of forward and reverse NB CE chirps has not been performed previously. An initial experiment explored this comparison, but due to limitations in the data quality obtained, the results should be treated with caution. For Experiment 2, data quality was improved by monitoring Fmp and residual noise levels, using Bayesian weighting and increasing our cohort of participants. ABRs were recorded in 28 normal hearing adults in response to forward and time-reverse broadband and 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz NB CE chirp stimuli at 50 dB HL using ER-3A insert earphones. ABR traces were recorded on the Interacoustic Eclipse and 20 subjects met an inclusion criterion for data quality. There was a small but significant increase in wave V ABR amplitudes when comparing forward and reverse CE chirps at 1, 2 and 4 kHz (p<0.005). There was a larger effect for the broadband CE chirp (p<0.005) but no significant effect at 500 Hz CE chirp (p=0.814). Overall it appears that there is an effect of the forward over the reversed chirps for one-octave wide 1, 2 and 4 kHz NB CE chirps. However, there was not a benefit of direction for the 500 Hz CE chirp, so this stimulus may not be resolved as a chirp by the cochlea.

Finally, we explored the effect of high pass filter setting on the quality of ABR responses elicited by broadband and NB CE chirps, using high pass filter settings ranging from 10 – 100 Hz. There was a statistically significant reduction in the ABR wave V amplitude response with increasing high pass filter setting. From the results it appears that energy in the frequency band 10-100 Hz is responsible for approximately half of wave V ABR amplitudes.
University of Southampton
Suleman, Salim
d85f0e10-50d8-496e-b694-5c28f2f4e5e6
Suleman, Salim
d85f0e10-50d8-496e-b694-5c28f2f4e5e6
Bell, Steven
91de0801-d2b7-44ba-8e8e-523e672aed8a

Suleman, Salim (2021) Auditory Brainstem Response elicited by CE chirps and an investigation of their time-frequency properties. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 188pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Chirps are a family of stimuli designed to provide enhanced neural synchronicity and hence improve ABR amplitudes. It is known that NB CE chirps can achieve greater wave V amplitude waveforms compared to the traditional tone pip (Ferm et al 2013, 2015; Rodrigues et al 2013; Cobb et al 2016). However, it is unclear whether this is due to the wider bandwidth of the NB CE chirp or the frequency-delay characteristics of the stimuli. The aim of this study was to evaluate CE chirps and investigate their time-frequency properties in three ways: 1. comparing the acoustic spectrum of the NB CE chirps with traditional tone pips 2. analysing the time-frequency properties of the NB CE chirps through spectrograms and 3. measurement of wave V amplitudes stimulated by forward and reverse CE chirps.

The acoustical spectral bandwidth for CE chirp stimuli and Blackman-gated tone pips were compared at 500 Hz and 4 kHz. The 500 Hz CE chirp was 43% wider than the 500 Hz tone pip and the 4 kHz CE chirp was 40% wider than the 4 kHz tone pip. The widened acoustic spectra for the NB CE chirp could be a contributing factor to the increased wave V amplitude shown for NB CE chirps over tone pips in clinical practice.

Spectrograms were generated to assess the time-frequency properties of the chirp that should show a nonlinearly sweep in time from low to high frequency compared to a time reversed chirp that should show the opposite. This frequency sweep appears clear for 4 kHz and 2 kHz NB CE chirps, 1 kHz NB CE chirp frequency sweep appears to be on the limit of being resolved and the 500 Hz CE chirp sweep could not be resolved by spectrogram analysis. The stimuli were also tested in an auditory nerve model. From the model outputs it appears that the lowest frequency chirps may not be well resolved by the auditory system.

An issue with producing effective band limited chirps is that the short stimulus must be frequency specific but still follow the frequency-delay function of the cochlea by sweeping in frequency over time. Dau (2000) and Petoe (2010) both showed that a time reversed broadband chirp produces a smaller wave V ABR response compared to a forward broadband chirp, therefore showing that the time-frequency properties of broadband chirp can be resolved by the cochlea. With the NB CE chirps we may be near the limit of time-frequency resolution but a comparison of forward and reverse NB CE chirps has not been performed previously. An initial experiment explored this comparison, but due to limitations in the data quality obtained, the results should be treated with caution. For Experiment 2, data quality was improved by monitoring Fmp and residual noise levels, using Bayesian weighting and increasing our cohort of participants. ABRs were recorded in 28 normal hearing adults in response to forward and time-reverse broadband and 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz NB CE chirp stimuli at 50 dB HL using ER-3A insert earphones. ABR traces were recorded on the Interacoustic Eclipse and 20 subjects met an inclusion criterion for data quality. There was a small but significant increase in wave V ABR amplitudes when comparing forward and reverse CE chirps at 1, 2 and 4 kHz (p<0.005). There was a larger effect for the broadband CE chirp (p<0.005) but no significant effect at 500 Hz CE chirp (p=0.814). Overall it appears that there is an effect of the forward over the reversed chirps for one-octave wide 1, 2 and 4 kHz NB CE chirps. However, there was not a benefit of direction for the 500 Hz CE chirp, so this stimulus may not be resolved as a chirp by the cochlea.

Finally, we explored the effect of high pass filter setting on the quality of ABR responses elicited by broadband and NB CE chirps, using high pass filter settings ranging from 10 – 100 Hz. There was a statistically significant reduction in the ABR wave V amplitude response with increasing high pass filter setting. From the results it appears that energy in the frequency band 10-100 Hz is responsible for approximately half of wave V ABR amplitudes.

Text
Auditory Brainstem Response elicited by CE chirps and an investigation - Version of Record
Download (13MB)

More information

Published date: January 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452394
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452394
PURE UUID: 90543984-4b58-41da-842c-fc871f7488bc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Dec 2021 17:58
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 12:08

Export record

Contributors

Author: Salim Suleman
Thesis advisor: Steven Bell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×