The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Running Side by Side: An Ethnography of Multi-Professional Involvement in the Advance Care Planning Process in Two Nursing Homes

Running Side by Side: An Ethnography of Multi-Professional Involvement in the Advance Care Planning Process in Two Nursing Homes
Running Side by Side: An Ethnography of Multi-Professional Involvement in the Advance Care Planning Process in Two Nursing Homes
This thesis explores the involvement of health and social care professionals in advance care planning (ACP), as an exemplar of end-of-life care practice, and the impact of this involvement in two purposively selected nursing homes. Nursing homes are significant providers of end-of-life care and their role in this area of care is likely to increase given the ageing population. Multi-professional working is a key component of the espoused model of palliative care delivery. Yet, there has been limited research into multi-professional working in nursing homes. Ethnography was used for the study, with between six and seven months spent in each home. Data collection methods were observation; formal and informal interviews; and document review. Participants included nineteen nursing home staff, seven health and social care professionals, six residents and four relatives. Thematic analysis was integrated with documentary analysis, mapping of resident ACP trajectories and comparative analysis of data from the two nursing homes.

Three key findings were identified: the structure and organisation of professional practice was disjointed and disrupted the continuity and coordination required to enact ACP; challenges were encountered in the enactment of ACP which impact multi-professional involvement; and the dominance of a biomedical approach to ACP constrained the breadth of both ACP and multi- professional working. Multi-professional working was not integrated with ACP in either nursing home and a conceptual framework has been developed which represents ACP and multi- professional working as ‘Running Side by Side’. The conceptualisation of ACP, with a lack of collective understanding, and its construction as a professional process, defined in biomedical terms and controlled by professionals, meant there could be different professional ACP processes running side by side. Professional-led ACP frequently ran side by side with resident priorities for future planning. The involvement of relatives and a wider multi-professional team, beyond nurses and GPs, was not always recognised, so ACP they undertook could also run side by side with other strands of ACP. The conceptual framework provides one way to better understand this complex and under-researched area of practice. It highlights a reciprocal impact between ACP and multi- professional working which, to my knowledge, has not been identified in previous research. The conceptual framework could also be applied to end-of-life care more broadly and suggests greater inter-agency and inter-professional working is required to ensure nursing home residents’ future wishes are both known and honoured.
University of Southampton
Andrews, Nicola
b156d179-2451-4a03-8130-caa20a00b72d
Andrews, Nicola
b156d179-2451-4a03-8130-caa20a00b72d
Duke, Susan
f0dc024d-f940-4f43-b5f9-adab34833ce7
Myall, Michelle
0604ba0f-75c2-4783-9afe-aa54bf81513f

Andrews, Nicola (2021) Running Side by Side: An Ethnography of Multi-Professional Involvement in the Advance Care Planning Process in Two Nursing Homes. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 310pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

This thesis explores the involvement of health and social care professionals in advance care planning (ACP), as an exemplar of end-of-life care practice, and the impact of this involvement in two purposively selected nursing homes. Nursing homes are significant providers of end-of-life care and their role in this area of care is likely to increase given the ageing population. Multi-professional working is a key component of the espoused model of palliative care delivery. Yet, there has been limited research into multi-professional working in nursing homes. Ethnography was used for the study, with between six and seven months spent in each home. Data collection methods were observation; formal and informal interviews; and document review. Participants included nineteen nursing home staff, seven health and social care professionals, six residents and four relatives. Thematic analysis was integrated with documentary analysis, mapping of resident ACP trajectories and comparative analysis of data from the two nursing homes.

Three key findings were identified: the structure and organisation of professional practice was disjointed and disrupted the continuity and coordination required to enact ACP; challenges were encountered in the enactment of ACP which impact multi-professional involvement; and the dominance of a biomedical approach to ACP constrained the breadth of both ACP and multi- professional working. Multi-professional working was not integrated with ACP in either nursing home and a conceptual framework has been developed which represents ACP and multi- professional working as ‘Running Side by Side’. The conceptualisation of ACP, with a lack of collective understanding, and its construction as a professional process, defined in biomedical terms and controlled by professionals, meant there could be different professional ACP processes running side by side. Professional-led ACP frequently ran side by side with resident priorities for future planning. The involvement of relatives and a wider multi-professional team, beyond nurses and GPs, was not always recognised, so ACP they undertook could also run side by side with other strands of ACP. The conceptual framework provides one way to better understand this complex and under-researched area of practice. It highlights a reciprocal impact between ACP and multi- professional working which, to my knowledge, has not been identified in previous research. The conceptual framework could also be applied to end-of-life care more broadly and suggests greater inter-agency and inter-professional working is required to ensure nursing home residents’ future wishes are both known and honoured.

Text
Final Thesis - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (5MB)
Text
Permission to deposit thesis Nicola Andrews
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452422
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452422
PURE UUID: 6e07e897-6ea3-4204-a8bf-e8ee64a43e08
ORCID for Nicola Andrews: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-1825
ORCID for Susan Duke: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-8086
ORCID for Michelle Myall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-7412

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Dec 2021 18:18
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:07

Export record

Contributors

Author: Nicola Andrews ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Susan Duke ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Michelle Myall ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×