The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A mixed methods study exploring perfectionism, well-being and flourishing in U.K. secondary school students

A mixed methods study exploring perfectionism, well-being and flourishing in U.K. secondary school students
A mixed methods study exploring perfectionism, well-being and flourishing in U.K. secondary school students
Perfectionism has been conceptualised as a multidimensional personality characteristic with adaptive and maladaptive aspects. Much research on perfectionism amongst children and young people (CYP) has focused on its links with negative mental health outcomes.

The systematic literature review examined the effectiveness of interventions targeting perfectionism in children and adolescents. 16 studies were identified and quality assessed. Findings were grouped according to participant samples: universal samples, gifted students, participants with elevated perfectionism and clinical samples. Results suggested that interventions targeting perfectionism can be effective in adolescents from clinical and non-clinical samples and those with elevated perfectionism. However, interventions were often not effective in lowering all perfectionism dimensions measured. Furthermore, dimensions conceptualised as adaptive were often reduced in addition to those conceptualised as maladaptive. The studies contained several methodological limitations, including lack of blinding and fidelity assessment, and reliance on self-report measures. It was concluded that those considering implementing such interventions should exercise caution. More research is needed to clarify when and how perfectionism can be helpful and harmful to CYP to inform decisions around intervention.

The empirical paper used a mixed methods design to explore differences in well-being and flourishing between students classed as adaptive, maladaptive and non-perfectionists, and to identify factors that support adaptive perfectionists’ well-being in school. In the quantitative phase, 260 secondary school students (aged 13–15) completed measures of perfectionism, well-being and flourishing. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants identified as flourishing adaptive perfectionists. Kruskal-Wallis tests and pairwise comparisons revealed that adaptive perfectionists had significantly higher total, emotional, social and psychological well-being than maladaptive and non-perfectionists. Maladaptive perfectionists also had significantly higher total and psychological well-being than non-perfectionists. The emotional and social well-being scores of maladaptive and non-perfectionists did not significantly differ. Furthermore, a chi-square test revealed that significantly more adaptive perfectionists were classed as ‘flourishing’ than would be expected if they were equally distributed across mental health status categories. Significantly more non-perfectionists were classed as ‘languishing’ than expected. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed four overarching themes: ‘social support’, ‘life outside of school’, ‘reactions to imperfection’ and ‘coping with challenges’. Overall, findings highlighted the importance of examining how perfectionism may promote well-being as well as suggesting useful implications for practice, including helping CYP to develop coping strategies, growth mindsets and social support networks.
University of Southampton
Holmes, Lauren Marie
8714b439-4145-4982-9634-6b35cf33f232
Holmes, Lauren Marie
8714b439-4145-4982-9634-6b35cf33f232
Hartwell, Brettany
a78864cc-f296-45f9-96c4-648c2b1f8a61

Holmes, Lauren Marie (2020) A mixed methods study exploring perfectionism, well-being and flourishing in U.K. secondary school students. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 221pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Perfectionism has been conceptualised as a multidimensional personality characteristic with adaptive and maladaptive aspects. Much research on perfectionism amongst children and young people (CYP) has focused on its links with negative mental health outcomes.

The systematic literature review examined the effectiveness of interventions targeting perfectionism in children and adolescents. 16 studies were identified and quality assessed. Findings were grouped according to participant samples: universal samples, gifted students, participants with elevated perfectionism and clinical samples. Results suggested that interventions targeting perfectionism can be effective in adolescents from clinical and non-clinical samples and those with elevated perfectionism. However, interventions were often not effective in lowering all perfectionism dimensions measured. Furthermore, dimensions conceptualised as adaptive were often reduced in addition to those conceptualised as maladaptive. The studies contained several methodological limitations, including lack of blinding and fidelity assessment, and reliance on self-report measures. It was concluded that those considering implementing such interventions should exercise caution. More research is needed to clarify when and how perfectionism can be helpful and harmful to CYP to inform decisions around intervention.

The empirical paper used a mixed methods design to explore differences in well-being and flourishing between students classed as adaptive, maladaptive and non-perfectionists, and to identify factors that support adaptive perfectionists’ well-being in school. In the quantitative phase, 260 secondary school students (aged 13–15) completed measures of perfectionism, well-being and flourishing. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 participants identified as flourishing adaptive perfectionists. Kruskal-Wallis tests and pairwise comparisons revealed that adaptive perfectionists had significantly higher total, emotional, social and psychological well-being than maladaptive and non-perfectionists. Maladaptive perfectionists also had significantly higher total and psychological well-being than non-perfectionists. The emotional and social well-being scores of maladaptive and non-perfectionists did not significantly differ. Furthermore, a chi-square test revealed that significantly more adaptive perfectionists were classed as ‘flourishing’ than would be expected if they were equally distributed across mental health status categories. Significantly more non-perfectionists were classed as ‘languishing’ than expected. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed four overarching themes: ‘social support’, ‘life outside of school’, ‘reactions to imperfection’ and ‘coping with challenges’. Overall, findings highlighted the importance of examining how perfectionism may promote well-being as well as suggesting useful implications for practice, including helping CYP to develop coping strategies, growth mindsets and social support networks.

Text
Lauren Holmes FINAL THESIS PDF 3 - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (4MB)
Text
Permission to deposit thesis form - LH 2
Restricted to Repository staff only

More information

Published date: June 2020

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452457
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452457
PURE UUID: d5c4a902-8078-416c-98ad-62d0254f07d1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Dec 2021 06:57
Last modified: 06 Jun 2024 04:01

Export record

Contributors

Author: Lauren Marie Holmes
Thesis advisor: Brettany Hartwell

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×