The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

What medical students think about measurement of their wellbeing and the implications for pastoral support: cross sectional survey and qualitative interviews

What medical students think about measurement of their wellbeing and the implications for pastoral support: cross sectional survey and qualitative interviews
What medical students think about measurement of their wellbeing and the implications for pastoral support: cross sectional survey and qualitative interviews
Objectives To find out how, why and when medical students think wellbeing should be measured.

Design A mixed methods study comprising a cross-sectional online survey (November 2020-March 2021) and semi-structured on-line interviews. Views on the frequency of availability for measurement, the format, type and purpose of measurement, and with whom wellbeing should be discussed were measured. When an outcome was scored 7-9 on a 9-point Likert scale of agreement by ≥75% of participants it was considered critical, in line with COMET and GRADE processes for rating recommendations. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken on the interview transcripts by two independent researchers.

Setting All Medicine programmes at University of Southampton.

Participants Medical students from all years took part in the survey (n=118) and interviews (n=16).

Results Participant demographics were similar to national medical student demographics. Most participants (94%) felt able to give 5 minutes to measure their wellbeing at least once a month. No single format of measurement was rated critical. Research, governance and individual feedback all reached the 75% threshold for the purpose being considered critically important. Only subjective assessments undertaken by the individual in real-time were rated as critically important (78.1%) measurement tools. Students selected that they would discuss their wellbeing with other medical students (n=87) nearly as often as they selected a member of the Faculty (n=104). Top determinants of wellbeing picked by medical students were energy, ability to do activities of daily living, and negative feelings. Five interview themes further explained these findings.

Conclusions Five recommendations about self-care teaching, quality-assured pastoral and peer support, proactive wellbeing check-ins and demographic data are discussed in light of these findings. Methods to achieve them are suggested, which are medical student-centred, and which make use of existing resources.
Simons, G.
a619e51c-448c-4f30-b860-e31bd4c02ebf
Effah, R.
427dfcef-3390-425f-9722-6cd35069a4c0
Baldwin, D.S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
Simons, G.
a619e51c-448c-4f30-b860-e31bd4c02ebf
Effah, R.
427dfcef-3390-425f-9722-6cd35069a4c0
Baldwin, D.S.
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e

Simons, G., Effah, R. and Baldwin, D.S. (2021) What medical students think about measurement of their wellbeing and the implications for pastoral support: cross sectional survey and qualitative interviews. (doi:10.1101/2021.08.24.21262526).

Record type: Other

Abstract

Objectives To find out how, why and when medical students think wellbeing should be measured.

Design A mixed methods study comprising a cross-sectional online survey (November 2020-March 2021) and semi-structured on-line interviews. Views on the frequency of availability for measurement, the format, type and purpose of measurement, and with whom wellbeing should be discussed were measured. When an outcome was scored 7-9 on a 9-point Likert scale of agreement by ≥75% of participants it was considered critical, in line with COMET and GRADE processes for rating recommendations. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken on the interview transcripts by two independent researchers.

Setting All Medicine programmes at University of Southampton.

Participants Medical students from all years took part in the survey (n=118) and interviews (n=16).

Results Participant demographics were similar to national medical student demographics. Most participants (94%) felt able to give 5 minutes to measure their wellbeing at least once a month. No single format of measurement was rated critical. Research, governance and individual feedback all reached the 75% threshold for the purpose being considered critically important. Only subjective assessments undertaken by the individual in real-time were rated as critically important (78.1%) measurement tools. Students selected that they would discuss their wellbeing with other medical students (n=87) nearly as often as they selected a member of the Faculty (n=104). Top determinants of wellbeing picked by medical students were energy, ability to do activities of daily living, and negative feelings. Five interview themes further explained these findings.

Conclusions Five recommendations about self-care teaching, quality-assured pastoral and peer support, proactive wellbeing check-ins and demographic data are discussed in light of these findings. Methods to achieve them are suggested, which are medical student-centred, and which make use of existing resources.

Text
2021.08.24.21262526v1.full - Version of Record
Download (478kB)

More information

Published date: 28 August 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452731
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452731
PURE UUID: 871f3b4a-1776-45ca-b295-0f471373bf31
ORCID for D.S. Baldwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Dec 2021 17:50
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:41

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: G. Simons
Author: R. Effah
Author: D.S. Baldwin ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×