Won't you stay just a little bit longer? A Discrete Choice Experiment of UK doctors’ preferences for delaying retirement
Won't you stay just a little bit longer? A Discrete Choice Experiment of UK doctors’ preferences for delaying retirement
Introduction and aims: health systems around the world face difficulties retaining their workforce, which is exacerbated by the early retirement of experienced clinicians. This study aims to determine how to incentivise doctors to delay their retirement.
Methods: we used a discrete choice experiment to estimate the relative importance of job characteristics in doctors’ willingness to delay retirement, and the number of extra years they were willing to delay retirement when job characteristics improved. 2885 British Medical Association members aged between 50 and 70 years, registered with the General Medical Council, practising in Scotland (in December 2019), and who had not started to draw a pension were invited. We compared the preferences of hospital doctors (HDs) and general practitioners (GPs).
Results: the response rate was 27.4% (n = 788). The number of extra years expected to work was the most important job characteristic for both respondents, followed by work intensity for GPs, whereas working hours and on-call were more important for HDs. Personalised working conditions and pension taxation were the least important characteristics for both groups. Setting all characteristics to their BEST levels, GPs would be willing to delay retirement by 4 years and HDs by 7 years.
Conclusions: characteristics related to the job rather than pension could have the greatest impact on delaying retirement among clinicians.
Discrete choice experiment, Doctors, Retirement, Workforce retention
Cleland, Jennifer Anne
f0403b18-256e-4517-966b-12f473355831
Porteous, Terry
26ca103a-8275-449e-af07-8bf4544eeb4b
Ejebu, Ourega-Zoé
4f545ae3-4823-44ab-8d59-185d30929ada
Ryan, Mandy
6a17e072-eddf-40b7-9f1a-49d58176d72e
Skåtun, Diane
783f6554-6fa5-4519-a358-6c9dbf7f424a
22 November 2021
Cleland, Jennifer Anne
f0403b18-256e-4517-966b-12f473355831
Porteous, Terry
26ca103a-8275-449e-af07-8bf4544eeb4b
Ejebu, Ourega-Zoé
4f545ae3-4823-44ab-8d59-185d30929ada
Ryan, Mandy
6a17e072-eddf-40b7-9f1a-49d58176d72e
Skåtun, Diane
783f6554-6fa5-4519-a358-6c9dbf7f424a
Cleland, Jennifer Anne, Porteous, Terry, Ejebu, Ourega-Zoé, Ryan, Mandy and Skåtun, Diane
(2021)
Won't you stay just a little bit longer? A Discrete Choice Experiment of UK doctors’ preferences for delaying retirement.
Health Policy.
(doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.004).
Abstract
Introduction and aims: health systems around the world face difficulties retaining their workforce, which is exacerbated by the early retirement of experienced clinicians. This study aims to determine how to incentivise doctors to delay their retirement.
Methods: we used a discrete choice experiment to estimate the relative importance of job characteristics in doctors’ willingness to delay retirement, and the number of extra years they were willing to delay retirement when job characteristics improved. 2885 British Medical Association members aged between 50 and 70 years, registered with the General Medical Council, practising in Scotland (in December 2019), and who had not started to draw a pension were invited. We compared the preferences of hospital doctors (HDs) and general practitioners (GPs).
Results: the response rate was 27.4% (n = 788). The number of extra years expected to work was the most important job characteristic for both respondents, followed by work intensity for GPs, whereas working hours and on-call were more important for HDs. Personalised working conditions and pension taxation were the least important characteristics for both groups. Setting all characteristics to their BEST levels, GPs would be willing to delay retirement by 4 years and HDs by 7 years.
Conclusions: characteristics related to the job rather than pension could have the greatest impact on delaying retirement among clinicians.
Text
Won’t you stay just a little bit longer ...
- Accepted Manuscript
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 12 November 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 22 November 2021
Published date: 22 November 2021
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
This study was funded by a grant from the University of Aberdeen Development Trust (UOA Ref: RG14022), and the qualitative data collection (reported separately) was supported by funding from BMA Scotland (UOA Ref: RG14434).
Funding Information:
The survey instrument and all available data can be obtained by contacting the corresponding author (JC). Our thanks to those friends and colleagues whose discussions about retirement, lifetime allowances and pensions ceilings were the motivation for this study. Thanks to all those who participated in qualitative interviews and in developing, piloting and completing the survey. Thanks also go to BMA Scotland for the distribution of invitations. This study was funded by a grant from the University of Aberdeen Development Trust (UOA Ref: RG14022), and the qualitative data collection (reported separately) was supported by funding from BMA Scotland (UOA Ref: RG14434). Not applicable. Approval for this study was granted by the College Ethics Review Board of the School of Life Sciences and Medicine at the University of Aberdeen (Ref: CERB/2018/12/1684), and by R&D departments of NHS Research Scotland in all Scottish Health Board Areas (IRAS: 238076). The study sponsor is the University of Aberdeen.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Discrete choice experiment, Doctors, Retirement, Workforce retention
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 452795
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452795
ISSN: 0168-8510
PURE UUID: 99dbc1d1-4e08-414d-b47e-f900db3ace82
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Dec 2021 17:51
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:05
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Jennifer Anne Cleland
Author:
Terry Porteous
Author:
Mandy Ryan
Author:
Diane Skåtun
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics