The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Amoxicillin duration and dose for community-acquired pneumonia in children: the CAP-IT factorial non-inferiority RCT

Amoxicillin duration and dose for community-acquired pneumonia in children: the CAP-IT factorial non-inferiority RCT
Amoxicillin duration and dose for community-acquired pneumonia in children: the CAP-IT factorial non-inferiority RCT

Background: Data are limited regarding the optimal dose and duration of amoxicillin treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in children. Objectives: To determine the efficacy, safety and impact on antimicrobial resistance of shorter (3-day) and longer (7-day) treatment with amoxicillin at both a lower and a higher dose at hospital discharge in children with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia. Design: A multicentre randomised double-blind 2 × 2 factorial non-inferiority trial in secondary care in the UK and Ireland. Setting: Paediatric emergency departments, paediatric assessment/observation units and inpatient wards. Participants: Children aged > 6 months, weighing 6-24 kg, with a clinical diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, in whom treatment with amoxicillin as the sole antibiotic was planned on discharge. Interventions: Oral amoxicillin syrup at a dose of 35-50 mg/kg/day compared with a dose of 70-90 mg/kg/day, and 3 compared with 7 days’ duration. Children were randomised simultaneously to each of the two factorial arms in a 1: 1 ratio. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was clinically indicated systemic antibacterial treatment prescribed for respiratory tract infection (including community-acquired pneumonia), other than trial medication, up to 28 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included severity and duration of parent/guardian-reported community-acquired pneumonia symptoms, drug-related adverse events (including thrush, skin rashes and diarrhoea), antimicrobial resistance and adherence to trial medication. Results: A total of 824 children were recruited from 29 hospitals. Ten participants received no trial medication and were excluded. Participants [median age 2.5 (interquartile range 1.6-2.7) years; 52% male] were randomised to either 3 (n = 413) or 7 days (n = 401) of trial medication at either lower (n = 410) or higher (n = 404) doses. There were 51 (12.5%) and 49 (12.5%) primary end points in the 3- and 7-day arms, respectively (difference 0.1%, 90% confidence interval -3.8% to 3.9%) and 51 (12.6%) and 49 (12.4%) primary end points in the low- and high-dose arms, respectively (difference 0.2%, 90% confidence interval -3.7% to 4.0%), both demonstrating non-inferiority. Resolution of cough was faster in the 7-day arm than in the 3-day arm for cough (10 days vs. 12 days) (p = 0.040), with no difference in time to resolution of other symptoms. The type and frequency of adverse events and rate of colonisation by penicillin-non-susceptible pneumococci were comparable between arms. Limitations: End-of-treatment swabs were not taken, and 28-day swabs were collected in only 53% of children. We focused on phenotypic penicillin resistance testing in pneumococci in the nasopharynx, which does not describe the global impact on the microflora. Although 21% of children did not attend the final 28-day visit, we obtained data from general practitioners for the primary end point on all but 3% of children. Conclusions: Antibiotic retreatment, adverse events and nasopharyngeal colonisation by penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci were similar with the higher and lower amoxicillin doses and the 3- and 7-day treatments. Time to resolution of cough and sleep disturbance was slightly longer in children taking 3 days’ amoxicillin, but time to resolution of all other symptoms was similar in both arms. Future work: Antimicrobial resistance genotypic studies are ongoing, including whole-genome sequencing and shotgun metagenomics, to fully characterise the effect of amoxicillin dose and duration on antimicrobial resistance. The analysis of a randomised substudy comparing parental electronic and paper diary entry is also ongoing. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN76888927, EudraCT 2016-000809-36 and CTA 00316/0246/001-0006.

Amoxicillin/adverse effects, Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects, Child, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Pneumonia/drug therapy, Technology Assessment, Biomedical
1366-5278
1-72
Barratt, Sam
fd352936-065f-4cf0-bbf1-788e8af39cd6
Bielicki, Julia A
f4f52b78-3805-4577-89c2-7b17bd60af57
Dunn, David
40047fc3-7acd-4a45-a59e-c99c65f18348
Faust, Saul N
f97df780-9f9b-418e-b349-7adf63e150c1
Finn, Adam
1c9de3fb-4f8b-4ce4-812e-c93506254d34
Harper, Lynda
f8bca7c5-6255-4362-b7ba-a8fae2d053fe
Jackson, Pauline
f60719d6-5606-49ed-a961-95a42b515323
Lyttle, Mark D
8b37d5d4-9dd1-4dfa-b251-7b560f4994c7
Powell, Colin Ve
81012de2-50f5-47f3-983b-a3b3e72b8fb8
Rogers, Louise
caf0b017-4755-4afa-b0e9-57a54d1d7c66
Roland, Damian
bac42549-2249-4b39-b272-4d11f451574a
Stöhr, Wolfgang
ef74c0a8-f057-494d-90dc-ea2706371b70
Sturgeon, Kate
77414ac9-6cdb-437f-b782-1eebd5f2d5b7
Vitale, Elia
0406bf24-36b1-4add-9415-b3618bbf60cf
Wan, Mandy
5cdc7f9b-501c-4d91-9a0d-5331221784e6
Gibb, Diana M
1d15e63b-eabb-442e-8da9-9e1456806ab0
Sharland, Mike
bf65788d-cc73-4fb6-9474-756f25a2e284
Barratt, Sam
fd352936-065f-4cf0-bbf1-788e8af39cd6
Bielicki, Julia A
f4f52b78-3805-4577-89c2-7b17bd60af57
Dunn, David
40047fc3-7acd-4a45-a59e-c99c65f18348
Faust, Saul N
f97df780-9f9b-418e-b349-7adf63e150c1
Finn, Adam
1c9de3fb-4f8b-4ce4-812e-c93506254d34
Harper, Lynda
f8bca7c5-6255-4362-b7ba-a8fae2d053fe
Jackson, Pauline
f60719d6-5606-49ed-a961-95a42b515323
Lyttle, Mark D
8b37d5d4-9dd1-4dfa-b251-7b560f4994c7
Powell, Colin Ve
81012de2-50f5-47f3-983b-a3b3e72b8fb8
Rogers, Louise
caf0b017-4755-4afa-b0e9-57a54d1d7c66
Roland, Damian
bac42549-2249-4b39-b272-4d11f451574a
Stöhr, Wolfgang
ef74c0a8-f057-494d-90dc-ea2706371b70
Sturgeon, Kate
77414ac9-6cdb-437f-b782-1eebd5f2d5b7
Vitale, Elia
0406bf24-36b1-4add-9415-b3618bbf60cf
Wan, Mandy
5cdc7f9b-501c-4d91-9a0d-5331221784e6
Gibb, Diana M
1d15e63b-eabb-442e-8da9-9e1456806ab0
Sharland, Mike
bf65788d-cc73-4fb6-9474-756f25a2e284

Barratt, Sam, Bielicki, Julia A, Dunn, David, Faust, Saul N, Finn, Adam, Harper, Lynda, Jackson, Pauline, Lyttle, Mark D, Powell, Colin Ve, Rogers, Louise, Roland, Damian, Stöhr, Wolfgang, Sturgeon, Kate, Vitale, Elia, Wan, Mandy, Gibb, Diana M and Sharland, Mike (2021) Amoxicillin duration and dose for community-acquired pneumonia in children: the CAP-IT factorial non-inferiority RCT. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 25 (60), 1-72. (doi:10.3310/hta25600).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Data are limited regarding the optimal dose and duration of amoxicillin treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in children. Objectives: To determine the efficacy, safety and impact on antimicrobial resistance of shorter (3-day) and longer (7-day) treatment with amoxicillin at both a lower and a higher dose at hospital discharge in children with uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia. Design: A multicentre randomised double-blind 2 × 2 factorial non-inferiority trial in secondary care in the UK and Ireland. Setting: Paediatric emergency departments, paediatric assessment/observation units and inpatient wards. Participants: Children aged > 6 months, weighing 6-24 kg, with a clinical diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, in whom treatment with amoxicillin as the sole antibiotic was planned on discharge. Interventions: Oral amoxicillin syrup at a dose of 35-50 mg/kg/day compared with a dose of 70-90 mg/kg/day, and 3 compared with 7 days’ duration. Children were randomised simultaneously to each of the two factorial arms in a 1: 1 ratio. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was clinically indicated systemic antibacterial treatment prescribed for respiratory tract infection (including community-acquired pneumonia), other than trial medication, up to 28 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included severity and duration of parent/guardian-reported community-acquired pneumonia symptoms, drug-related adverse events (including thrush, skin rashes and diarrhoea), antimicrobial resistance and adherence to trial medication. Results: A total of 824 children were recruited from 29 hospitals. Ten participants received no trial medication and were excluded. Participants [median age 2.5 (interquartile range 1.6-2.7) years; 52% male] were randomised to either 3 (n = 413) or 7 days (n = 401) of trial medication at either lower (n = 410) or higher (n = 404) doses. There were 51 (12.5%) and 49 (12.5%) primary end points in the 3- and 7-day arms, respectively (difference 0.1%, 90% confidence interval -3.8% to 3.9%) and 51 (12.6%) and 49 (12.4%) primary end points in the low- and high-dose arms, respectively (difference 0.2%, 90% confidence interval -3.7% to 4.0%), both demonstrating non-inferiority. Resolution of cough was faster in the 7-day arm than in the 3-day arm for cough (10 days vs. 12 days) (p = 0.040), with no difference in time to resolution of other symptoms. The type and frequency of adverse events and rate of colonisation by penicillin-non-susceptible pneumococci were comparable between arms. Limitations: End-of-treatment swabs were not taken, and 28-day swabs were collected in only 53% of children. We focused on phenotypic penicillin resistance testing in pneumococci in the nasopharynx, which does not describe the global impact on the microflora. Although 21% of children did not attend the final 28-day visit, we obtained data from general practitioners for the primary end point on all but 3% of children. Conclusions: Antibiotic retreatment, adverse events and nasopharyngeal colonisation by penicillin-nonsusceptible pneumococci were similar with the higher and lower amoxicillin doses and the 3- and 7-day treatments. Time to resolution of cough and sleep disturbance was slightly longer in children taking 3 days’ amoxicillin, but time to resolution of all other symptoms was similar in both arms. Future work: Antimicrobial resistance genotypic studies are ongoing, including whole-genome sequencing and shotgun metagenomics, to fully characterise the effect of amoxicillin dose and duration on antimicrobial resistance. The analysis of a randomised substudy comparing parental electronic and paper diary entry is also ongoing. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN76888927, EudraCT 2016-000809-36 and CTA 00316/0246/001-0006.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 4 November 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: l However, the situation is different in low-and middle-income settings, where the preferred formulation is dispersible tablets. The lowest-concentration child-appropriate solid formulation supported by the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) and WHO contains 250 mg of amoxicillin in a non-divisible dispersible tablet. Administration of this tablet twice a day to young infants (weighing 4–10 kg) gives a wide dose range of 50 (10 kg) to 125 (4 kg) mg/kg per day, with many children expected to receive doses in the higher dose range of CAP-IT. CAP-IT results did not identify any clinically relevant disadvantages to using higher doses; therefore, supporting the continued use of existing dispersible tablets. Funding Information: Declared competing interests of authors: David Dunn reports grants from the National Institute for Health Research during the conduct of the study (RP-PG-1212-20006). Saul N Faust reports personal fees or grants from AstraZeneca plc (Cambridge, UK)/Medimmune (Gaithersburg, MA, USA), Sanofi SA (Paris, France), Pfizer Inc. (New York, NY, USA), Seqirus UK Ltd (Maidenhead, UK), Sandoz (Holzkirchen, Germany), Merck KGAA (Darmstadt, Germany), GlaxoSmithKline plc (Brentford, UK) and Johnson & Johnson (Brunswick, NJ, USA) outside the submitted work. In addition, Saul N Faust received grants for contract commercial clinical trials, which were paid to Saul N Faust’s institution (with no personal payment of any kind). Last, Saul N Faust is a member of the Health Technology Assessment Commissioning Committee (2017–22). Adam Finn reports grants from GlaxoSmithKline plc, Pfizer Inc., Novavax (Gaithersburg, MA, USA), Sanofi Pasteur (Lyon, France), VBI Vaccines Inc. (Cambridge, MA, USA), Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Beerse, Belgium), Valneva SE (Saint-Herblain, France) and JITSUVAX outside the submitted work. Funding Information: The research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 13/88/11. The contractual start date was in March 2016. The draft report began editorial review in October 2020 and was accepted for publication in June 2021. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report. Funding Information: Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 60. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Barratt et al.
Keywords: Amoxicillin/adverse effects, Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects, Child, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Pneumonia/drug therapy, Technology Assessment, Biomedical

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452861
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452861
ISSN: 1366-5278
PURE UUID: ca5c512b-16af-454d-8c7e-6f5125036145
ORCID for Saul N Faust: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3410-7642

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Dec 2021 17:58
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:06

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sam Barratt
Author: Julia A Bielicki
Author: David Dunn
Author: Saul N Faust ORCID iD
Author: Adam Finn
Author: Lynda Harper
Author: Pauline Jackson
Author: Mark D Lyttle
Author: Colin Ve Powell
Author: Louise Rogers
Author: Damian Roland
Author: Wolfgang Stöhr
Author: Kate Sturgeon
Author: Elia Vitale
Author: Mandy Wan
Author: Diana M Gibb
Author: Mike Sharland

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×