The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Active control of sound scattering from a uniform impedance sphere: Power minimization versus backscattering cancellation

Active control of sound scattering from a uniform impedance sphere: Power minimization versus backscattering cancellation
Active control of sound scattering from a uniform impedance sphere: Power minimization versus backscattering cancellation
The current paper considers the case of a locally-reacting, uniform spherical scatterer in a homogeneous fluid, subjected to a monochromatic acoustic plane-wave incidence. The scattering behaviour is controlled with a single point-monopole acoustic secondary source on the surface of the sphere. Firstly, scattered sound power is reduced by ‘least mean squares’ minimization of the spherical harmonic component contributions in the sum between primary and secondary fields. Secondly, the far-field backscattered pressure is perfectly cancelled instead. Analytical approximations and simulations show that at low relative frequencies, for a given surface impedance, the far-field scattered pressure takes the shape of a figure-of-eight after power minimization and is attenuated in the half-space associated with the controlled direction after backscattering cancellation. The scattered sound power after control is a function of frequency which varies as the same power law, regardless of control method used or the position of the source on the incidence axis. However, the second con-trol method yields less attenuation of the scattered power than the first and in some cases can even enhance the scattered power. At large relative frequencies, the directivity of the point-monopole discriminates in favour of the half-space corresponding to its position on the sphere. Thus, placing the source opposite the backscattering direction to perform the second method significantly enhances the scattered power, as well as the far-field scattered pressure in the half-space opposite the backscattering direction.
active control, scattering, spherical harmonics
International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration
Orita, Mihai
b5850bb4-8337-4865-bb8f-50860169bee0
Elliott, Stephen
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Cheer, Jordan
8e452f50-4c7d-4d4e-913a-34015e99b9dc
Carletti, Eleonora
Crocker, Malcolm
Pawelczyk, Marek
Tuma, Jiri
Orita, Mihai
b5850bb4-8337-4865-bb8f-50860169bee0
Elliott, Stephen
721dc55c-8c3e-4895-b9c4-82f62abd3567
Cheer, Jordan
8e452f50-4c7d-4d4e-913a-34015e99b9dc
Carletti, Eleonora
Crocker, Malcolm
Pawelczyk, Marek
Tuma, Jiri

Orita, Mihai, Elliott, Stephen and Cheer, Jordan (2021) Active control of sound scattering from a uniform impedance sphere: Power minimization versus backscattering cancellation. Carletti, Eleonora, Crocker, Malcolm, Pawelczyk, Marek and Tuma, Jiri (eds.) In Proceedings of 27th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV27). International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration..

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

The current paper considers the case of a locally-reacting, uniform spherical scatterer in a homogeneous fluid, subjected to a monochromatic acoustic plane-wave incidence. The scattering behaviour is controlled with a single point-monopole acoustic secondary source on the surface of the sphere. Firstly, scattered sound power is reduced by ‘least mean squares’ minimization of the spherical harmonic component contributions in the sum between primary and secondary fields. Secondly, the far-field backscattered pressure is perfectly cancelled instead. Analytical approximations and simulations show that at low relative frequencies, for a given surface impedance, the far-field scattered pressure takes the shape of a figure-of-eight after power minimization and is attenuated in the half-space associated with the controlled direction after backscattering cancellation. The scattered sound power after control is a function of frequency which varies as the same power law, regardless of control method used or the position of the source on the incidence axis. However, the second con-trol method yields less attenuation of the scattered power than the first and in some cases can even enhance the scattered power. At large relative frequencies, the directivity of the point-monopole discriminates in favour of the half-space corresponding to its position on the sphere. Thus, placing the source opposite the backscattering direction to perform the second method significantly enhances the scattered power, as well as the far-field scattered pressure in the half-space opposite the backscattering direction.

Text
ICSV27 Mihai_Orita_2020 -- Scattered power minimization vs backscattering cancellation (002)
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 11 July 2021
Published date: 11 July 2021
Venue - Dates: 27th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, Hilton Prague Hotel, Prague, Czech Republic, 2020-07-12 - 2020-07-16
Keywords: active control, scattering, spherical harmonics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452898
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452898
PURE UUID: 67c6d7ca-08ca-46f9-a2f8-ece027dfaf07
ORCID for Mihai Orita: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-7307-0497
ORCID for Jordan Cheer: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0552-5506

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jan 2022 17:47
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:09

Export record

Contributors

Author: Mihai Orita ORCID iD
Author: Stephen Elliott
Author: Jordan Cheer ORCID iD
Editor: Eleonora Carletti
Editor: Malcolm Crocker
Editor: Marek Pawelczyk
Editor: Jiri Tuma

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×