Economic evaluation of interventions for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in resource-poor settings, using the example of Thailand
Economic evaluation of interventions for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in resource-poor settings, using the example of Thailand
Dengue fever has become a major public health problem. It is considered one of the most important mosquito-borne viral diseases and occurs in >100 countries in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia-Pacific, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa with >3 billion people at risk. Despite current control interventions against dengue fever in endemic countries, the disease is associated with considerable healthcare utilisation, personal costs to patients and caregivers, productivity loss, and human suffering. Whilst the illness is well understood, there is also recognition that current control efforts focussing predominantly on Aedes aegypti control and elimination are less than optimal, although they may still have an important role to play in the short to medium term. In this thesis, the epidemiological and economic impacts of dengue control interventions in Thailand, a geographical setting with a persistent, high level of dengue transmission areinvestigated, embracing chemical interventions (adulticide and larvicide), environmental control/ public health education and awareness, paediatric vaccination (using dengue vaccine profile[s] broadly consistent with [dengue] vaccines in late-stage development) and, in anticipation of possible new vector-control technologies, Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes. The premise that is being examined is not the ‘how’ of implementation, rather what the possible population impacts of different interventions are (both individually and in combination). Using three different and complementary analyses (epidemiological impact, i.e. effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis, and constrained optimisation), our findings show that the most useful method to reduce dengue burden (in terms of cases, costeffectiveness, and affordability, respectively) would be to combine vaccination with other form(s) of control, e.g. adulticide, environmental control/ public health education and awareness, and Wolbachia.
University of Southampton
Knerer, Gerhart
c9a2532c-59ee-4a07-9546-ee425f99e14a
2021
Knerer, Gerhart
c9a2532c-59ee-4a07-9546-ee425f99e14a
Brailsford, Sally
634585ff-c828-46ca-b33d-7ac017dda04f
Currie, Christine
dcfd0972-1b42-4fac-8a67-0258cfdeb55a
Knerer, Gerhart
(2021)
Economic evaluation of interventions for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in resource-poor settings, using the example of Thailand.
University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 181pp.
Record type:
Thesis
(Doctoral)
Abstract
Dengue fever has become a major public health problem. It is considered one of the most important mosquito-borne viral diseases and occurs in >100 countries in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia-Pacific, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa with >3 billion people at risk. Despite current control interventions against dengue fever in endemic countries, the disease is associated with considerable healthcare utilisation, personal costs to patients and caregivers, productivity loss, and human suffering. Whilst the illness is well understood, there is also recognition that current control efforts focussing predominantly on Aedes aegypti control and elimination are less than optimal, although they may still have an important role to play in the short to medium term. In this thesis, the epidemiological and economic impacts of dengue control interventions in Thailand, a geographical setting with a persistent, high level of dengue transmission areinvestigated, embracing chemical interventions (adulticide and larvicide), environmental control/ public health education and awareness, paediatric vaccination (using dengue vaccine profile[s] broadly consistent with [dengue] vaccines in late-stage development) and, in anticipation of possible new vector-control technologies, Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes. The premise that is being examined is not the ‘how’ of implementation, rather what the possible population impacts of different interventions are (both individually and in combination). Using three different and complementary analyses (epidemiological impact, i.e. effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis, and constrained optimisation), our findings show that the most useful method to reduce dengue burden (in terms of cases, costeffectiveness, and affordability, respectively) would be to combine vaccination with other form(s) of control, e.g. adulticide, environmental control/ public health education and awareness, and Wolbachia.
Text
GKnerer_PhD_University of Southampton_2021_FINAL THESIS_(Corrected)
- Version of Record
Text
Permission to deposit thesis - form_GK_CC_RW
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
More information
Published date: 2021
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 452909
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452909
PURE UUID: 0a2fe930-b5d7-4bf0-9971-f8c8f68ae2f8
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 06 Jan 2022 17:49
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:56
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Gerhart Knerer
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics