The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Economic evaluation of interventions for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in resource-poor settings, using the example of Thailand

Economic evaluation of interventions for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in resource-poor settings, using the example of Thailand
Economic evaluation of interventions for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in resource-poor settings, using the example of Thailand
Dengue fever has become a major public health problem. It is considered one of the most important mosquito-borne viral diseases and occurs in >100 countries in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia-Pacific, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa with >3 billion people at risk. Despite current control interventions against dengue fever in endemic countries, the disease is associated with considerable healthcare utilisation, personal costs to patients and caregivers, productivity loss, and human suffering. Whilst the illness is well understood, there is also recognition that current control efforts focussing predominantly on Aedes aegypti control and elimination are less than optimal, although they may still have an important role to play in the short to medium term. In this thesis, the epidemiological and economic impacts of dengue control interventions in Thailand, a geographical setting with a persistent, high level of dengue transmission areinvestigated, embracing chemical interventions (adulticide and larvicide), environmental control/ public health education and awareness, paediatric vaccination (using dengue vaccine profile[s] broadly consistent with [dengue] vaccines in late-stage development) and, in anticipation of possible new vector-control technologies, Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes. The premise that is being examined is not the ‘how’ of implementation, rather what the possible population impacts of different interventions are (both individually and in combination). Using three different and complementary analyses (epidemiological impact, i.e. effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis, and constrained optimisation), our findings show that the most useful method to reduce dengue burden (in terms of cases, costeffectiveness, and affordability, respectively) would be to combine vaccination with other form(s) of control, e.g. adulticide, environmental control/ public health education and awareness, and Wolbachia.
University of Southampton
Knerer, Gerhart
c9a2532c-59ee-4a07-9546-ee425f99e14a
Knerer, Gerhart
c9a2532c-59ee-4a07-9546-ee425f99e14a
Brailsford, Sally
634585ff-c828-46ca-b33d-7ac017dda04f
Currie, Christine
dcfd0972-1b42-4fac-8a67-0258cfdeb55a

Knerer, Gerhart (2021) Economic evaluation of interventions for dengue fever and dengue haemorrhagic fever in resource-poor settings, using the example of Thailand. University of Southampton, Doctoral Thesis, 181pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Dengue fever has become a major public health problem. It is considered one of the most important mosquito-borne viral diseases and occurs in >100 countries in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia-Pacific, the Americas, the Middle East, and Africa with >3 billion people at risk. Despite current control interventions against dengue fever in endemic countries, the disease is associated with considerable healthcare utilisation, personal costs to patients and caregivers, productivity loss, and human suffering. Whilst the illness is well understood, there is also recognition that current control efforts focussing predominantly on Aedes aegypti control and elimination are less than optimal, although they may still have an important role to play in the short to medium term. In this thesis, the epidemiological and economic impacts of dengue control interventions in Thailand, a geographical setting with a persistent, high level of dengue transmission areinvestigated, embracing chemical interventions (adulticide and larvicide), environmental control/ public health education and awareness, paediatric vaccination (using dengue vaccine profile[s] broadly consistent with [dengue] vaccines in late-stage development) and, in anticipation of possible new vector-control technologies, Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes. The premise that is being examined is not the ‘how’ of implementation, rather what the possible population impacts of different interventions are (both individually and in combination). Using three different and complementary analyses (epidemiological impact, i.e. effectiveness, cost-effectiveness analysis, and constrained optimisation), our findings show that the most useful method to reduce dengue burden (in terms of cases, costeffectiveness, and affordability, respectively) would be to combine vaccination with other form(s) of control, e.g. adulticide, environmental control/ public health education and awareness, and Wolbachia.

Text
GKnerer_PhD_University of Southampton_2021_FINAL THESIS_(Corrected) - Version of Record
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.
Download (2MB)
Text
Permission to deposit thesis - form_GK_CC_RW - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License University of Southampton Thesis Licence.

More information

Published date: 2021

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452909
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452909
PURE UUID: 0a2fe930-b5d7-4bf0-9971-f8c8f68ae2f8
ORCID for Sally Brailsford: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6665-8230
ORCID for Christine Currie: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-7016-3652

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jan 2022 17:49
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 02:56

Export record

Contributors

Author: Gerhart Knerer
Thesis advisor: Sally Brailsford ORCID iD
Thesis advisor: Christine Currie ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×