The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream energy resource

A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream energy resource
A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream energy resource
This review provides a critical, multi-faceted assessment of the practical contribution tidal stream energy can make to the UK and British Channel Islands future energy mix. Evidence is presented that broadly supports the latest national-scale practical resource estimate, of 34 TWh/year, equivalent to 11% of the UK’s current annual electricity demand. The size of the practical resource depends in part on the economic competitiveness of projects. In the UK, 124 MW of prospective tidal stream capacity is currently eligible to bid for subsidy support (MeyGen 1C, 80 MW; PTEC, 30 MW; and Morlais, 14 MW). It is estimated that the installation of this 124 MW would serve to drive down the levelized cost of energy (LCoE), through learning, from its current level of around 240 £/MWh to below 150 £/MWh, based on a mid-range technology learning rate of 17%. Doing so would make tidal stream cost competitive with technologies such as combined cycle gas turbines, biomass and anaerobic digestion. Installing this 124 MW by 2031 would put tidal stream on a trajectory to install the estimated 11.5 GW needed to generate 34 TWh/year by 2050. The cyclic, predictable nature of tidal stream power shows potential to provide additional, whole-system cost benefits. These include reductions in balancing expenditure that are not considered in conventional LCoE estimates. The practical resource is also dependent on environmental constraints. To date, no collisions between animals and turbines have been detected, and only small changes in habitat have been measured. The impacts of large arrays on stratification and predator–prey interaction are projected to be an order of magnitude less than those from climate change, highlighting opportunities for risk retirement. Ongoing field measurements will be important as arrays scale up, given the uncertainty in some environmental and ecological impact models. Based on the findings presented in this review, we recommend that an updated national-scale practical resource study is undertaken that implements high-fidelity, site-specific modelling, with improved model validation from the wide range of field measurements that are now available from the major sites. Quantifying the sensitivity of the practical resource to constraints will be important to establish opportunities for constraint retirement. Quantification of whole-system benefits is necessary to fully understand the value of tidal stream in the energy system.
tidal stream power, tidal stream energy, practical resource, cost of energy, system integration, environmental impact
1364-5021
Coles, Daniel
58e46bef-2a32-4b6e-b78b-7efede2a93ab
Angeloudis, Athanasios
eae49b99-64fc-4367-8464-0bd801fe3c19
Greaves, Deborah
3e92bac9-ef06-408d-8722-fe840fcaa43c
Hastie, Gordon
d0977a0a-e143-4984-b722-7091fc842f99
Mackie, Lucas
beae2aea-0b91-46d7-9f6d-6de470e283a1
McNaughton, James
e5972943-1865-4a33-8541-6221e8a6d3a6
Miles, Jon
72d5ddde-db90-471a-a2ea-46fe27d50b80
Neill, Simon
93fea49b-21f9-4202-9908-d4fcd815c544
Piggott, Matthew
ecfbaf4c-61ab-4a5e-82af-fdd9e34f36c8
Risch, Denise
ac397a82-74f9-4305-956f-edd2ea5b2e3c
Scott, Beth
c3bc8fc7-1332-415e-b85d-ad07d382dc43
Sparling, Carol
a22dbf7a-1d3d-4b38-91e6-6dd29a2536b6
Stallard, Tim
34e31064-c909-4517-9be1-229afd191478
Thies, Philipp
fa8e2d15-7bcc-4a70-adf1-94381c8f32c3
White, David
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Willden, Richard
6505e2fe-d570-48c1-a1bd-56d8ef299893
Williamson, Benjamin
ed9fcfca-1cfc-44c3-b4af-dca0b60c8a04
Coles, Daniel
58e46bef-2a32-4b6e-b78b-7efede2a93ab
Angeloudis, Athanasios
eae49b99-64fc-4367-8464-0bd801fe3c19
Greaves, Deborah
3e92bac9-ef06-408d-8722-fe840fcaa43c
Hastie, Gordon
d0977a0a-e143-4984-b722-7091fc842f99
Mackie, Lucas
beae2aea-0b91-46d7-9f6d-6de470e283a1
McNaughton, James
e5972943-1865-4a33-8541-6221e8a6d3a6
Miles, Jon
72d5ddde-db90-471a-a2ea-46fe27d50b80
Neill, Simon
93fea49b-21f9-4202-9908-d4fcd815c544
Piggott, Matthew
ecfbaf4c-61ab-4a5e-82af-fdd9e34f36c8
Risch, Denise
ac397a82-74f9-4305-956f-edd2ea5b2e3c
Scott, Beth
c3bc8fc7-1332-415e-b85d-ad07d382dc43
Sparling, Carol
a22dbf7a-1d3d-4b38-91e6-6dd29a2536b6
Stallard, Tim
34e31064-c909-4517-9be1-229afd191478
Thies, Philipp
fa8e2d15-7bcc-4a70-adf1-94381c8f32c3
White, David
a986033d-d26d-4419-a3f3-20dc54efce93
Willden, Richard
6505e2fe-d570-48c1-a1bd-56d8ef299893
Williamson, Benjamin
ed9fcfca-1cfc-44c3-b4af-dca0b60c8a04

Coles, Daniel, Angeloudis, Athanasios, Greaves, Deborah, Hastie, Gordon, Mackie, Lucas, McNaughton, James, Miles, Jon, Neill, Simon, Piggott, Matthew, Risch, Denise, Scott, Beth, Sparling, Carol, Stallard, Tim, Thies, Philipp, White, David, Willden, Richard and Williamson, Benjamin (2021) A review of the UK and British Channel Islands practical tidal stream energy resource. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 477 (2255). (doi:10.1098/rspa.2021.0469).

Record type: Review

Abstract

This review provides a critical, multi-faceted assessment of the practical contribution tidal stream energy can make to the UK and British Channel Islands future energy mix. Evidence is presented that broadly supports the latest national-scale practical resource estimate, of 34 TWh/year, equivalent to 11% of the UK’s current annual electricity demand. The size of the practical resource depends in part on the economic competitiveness of projects. In the UK, 124 MW of prospective tidal stream capacity is currently eligible to bid for subsidy support (MeyGen 1C, 80 MW; PTEC, 30 MW; and Morlais, 14 MW). It is estimated that the installation of this 124 MW would serve to drive down the levelized cost of energy (LCoE), through learning, from its current level of around 240 £/MWh to below 150 £/MWh, based on a mid-range technology learning rate of 17%. Doing so would make tidal stream cost competitive with technologies such as combined cycle gas turbines, biomass and anaerobic digestion. Installing this 124 MW by 2031 would put tidal stream on a trajectory to install the estimated 11.5 GW needed to generate 34 TWh/year by 2050. The cyclic, predictable nature of tidal stream power shows potential to provide additional, whole-system cost benefits. These include reductions in balancing expenditure that are not considered in conventional LCoE estimates. The practical resource is also dependent on environmental constraints. To date, no collisions between animals and turbines have been detected, and only small changes in habitat have been measured. The impacts of large arrays on stratification and predator–prey interaction are projected to be an order of magnitude less than those from climate change, highlighting opportunities for risk retirement. Ongoing field measurements will be important as arrays scale up, given the uncertainty in some environmental and ecological impact models. Based on the findings presented in this review, we recommend that an updated national-scale practical resource study is undertaken that implements high-fidelity, site-specific modelling, with improved model validation from the wide range of field measurements that are now available from the major sites. Quantifying the sensitivity of the practical resource to constraints will be important to establish opportunities for constraint retirement. Quantification of whole-system benefits is necessary to fully understand the value of tidal stream in the energy system.

Text
rspa.2021.0469 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 6 October 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 November 2021
Published date: 24 November 2021
Keywords: tidal stream power, tidal stream energy, practical resource, cost of energy, system integration, environmental impact

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 452914
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/452914
ISSN: 1364-5021
PURE UUID: a59a429b-68fc-4a3d-81ad-ecfe72e81289
ORCID for David White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-582X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 06 Jan 2022 17:49
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daniel Coles
Author: Athanasios Angeloudis
Author: Deborah Greaves
Author: Gordon Hastie
Author: Lucas Mackie
Author: James McNaughton
Author: Jon Miles
Author: Simon Neill
Author: Matthew Piggott
Author: Denise Risch
Author: Beth Scott
Author: Carol Sparling
Author: Tim Stallard
Author: Philipp Thies
Author: David White ORCID iD
Author: Richard Willden
Author: Benjamin Williamson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×