Challenges and solutions: surveying researchers on what type of community engagement and involvement activities are feasible in low and middle income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
Challenges and solutions: surveying researchers on what type of community engagement and involvement activities are feasible in low and middle income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic
OBJECTIVES: Measures to limit the spread of infection during the COVID-19 global pandemic have made engaging and involving members of the community in global health research more challenging. This research aimed to explore how global health researchers adapted to the imposed pandemic measures in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and how they overcame challenges to effective community engagement and involvement (CEI).
DESIGN: A qualitative two-stage mixed-methods study involving an online survey and a virtual round table.
SETTING: The survey and round table were completed online.
PARTICIPANTS: Of 53 participants, 43 were LMIC-based or UK-based global health researchers and/or CEI professionals, and 10 worked for the National Institute for Health Research or UK Government's Department of Health and Social Care.
OUTCOME MEASURES: This study aimed to capture data on: the number of CEI activities halted and adapted because of the COVID-19 pandemic; where CEI is possible; how it has been adapted; what the challenges and successes were; and the potential impact of adapted or halted CEI on global health research.
RESULTS: Pandemic control measures forced the majority of researchers to stop or amend their planned CEI activities. Most face-to-face CEI activities were replaced with remote methods, such as online communication. Virtual engagement enabled researchers to maintain already established relationships with community members, but was less effective when developing new relationships or addressing challenges around the inclusion of marginalised community groups.
CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has highlighted the need for contingency planning and flexibility in CEI. The redesigning and adopting of remote methods has come with both advantages and disadvantages, and required new skills, access to technology, funding, reliable services and enthusiasm from stakeholders. The methods suggested have the potential to augment or substitute previously preferred CEI activities. The effectiveness and impact of these remote CEI activities need to be assessed.
COVID-19, infectious diseases, statistics & research methods
Kroese, Karolin
9e24ecbc-1620-4b6e-bf8e-afc3ad4a9114
Porter, Katie
c3fafeb5-3e07-4870-8489-d871f0a53c64
Surridge, Heidi
b7f2d027-ab2c-4843-9e62-2d2b4b5331cc
Tembo, Doreen
def2592f-c1e8-42a6-bfec-81fe3620da03
27 October 2021
Kroese, Karolin
9e24ecbc-1620-4b6e-bf8e-afc3ad4a9114
Porter, Katie
c3fafeb5-3e07-4870-8489-d871f0a53c64
Surridge, Heidi
b7f2d027-ab2c-4843-9e62-2d2b4b5331cc
Tembo, Doreen
def2592f-c1e8-42a6-bfec-81fe3620da03
Kroese, Karolin, Porter, Katie, Surridge, Heidi and Tembo, Doreen
(2021)
Challenges and solutions: surveying researchers on what type of community engagement and involvement activities are feasible in low and middle income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.
BMJ Open, 11 (10), [e052135].
(doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052135).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Measures to limit the spread of infection during the COVID-19 global pandemic have made engaging and involving members of the community in global health research more challenging. This research aimed to explore how global health researchers adapted to the imposed pandemic measures in low and middle income countries (LMICs) and how they overcame challenges to effective community engagement and involvement (CEI).
DESIGN: A qualitative two-stage mixed-methods study involving an online survey and a virtual round table.
SETTING: The survey and round table were completed online.
PARTICIPANTS: Of 53 participants, 43 were LMIC-based or UK-based global health researchers and/or CEI professionals, and 10 worked for the National Institute for Health Research or UK Government's Department of Health and Social Care.
OUTCOME MEASURES: This study aimed to capture data on: the number of CEI activities halted and adapted because of the COVID-19 pandemic; where CEI is possible; how it has been adapted; what the challenges and successes were; and the potential impact of adapted or halted CEI on global health research.
RESULTS: Pandemic control measures forced the majority of researchers to stop or amend their planned CEI activities. Most face-to-face CEI activities were replaced with remote methods, such as online communication. Virtual engagement enabled researchers to maintain already established relationships with community members, but was less effective when developing new relationships or addressing challenges around the inclusion of marginalised community groups.
CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has highlighted the need for contingency planning and flexibility in CEI. The redesigning and adopting of remote methods has come with both advantages and disadvantages, and required new skills, access to technology, funding, reliable services and enthusiasm from stakeholders. The methods suggested have the potential to augment or substitute previously preferred CEI activities. The effectiveness and impact of these remote CEI activities need to be assessed.
Text
e052135.full
- Version of Record
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 13 October 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 27 October 2021
Published date: 27 October 2021
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
Funding This research was funded internally by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR). Award/Grant number is not applicable.
Publisher Copyright:
©
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords:
COVID-19, infectious diseases, statistics & research methods
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453015
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453015
ISSN: 2044-6055
PURE UUID: b8e1ac97-d33e-4995-90d7-f5edd0a0ac8d
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jan 2022 16:14
Last modified: 11 Jul 2024 02:04
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Karolin Kroese
Author:
Katie Porter
Author:
Heidi Surridge
Author:
Doreen Tembo
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics