An Online ‘Face to Face’ Focus Group Approach for Understanding How Household Energy Use and Green Investment Decisions Differ by Personality Traits
An Online ‘Face to Face’ Focus Group Approach for Understanding How Household Energy Use and Green Investment Decisions Differ by Personality Traits
In a UK context, encouraging the uptake of energy efficiency measures at the household level is an ongoing challenge of ever-increasing importance. A combination of economic and psychological factors influence green investment decisions and so this study aims to determine whether online focus groups are a viable means of interacting and evaluating the effectiveness of personality tailored marketing strategies. Here, we present the learnings from over 70 synchronous online focus groups undertaken with a UK energy provider’s household customers (N = 143) to test the effectiveness of two energy product propositions (smart thermostat and hybrid heat pump) through two channels of communication: video and discussion. The researchers examined and analysed the online engagement and focus group method, focusing on the customer feedback, appropriateness of the approach and how it works in practice, providing key learnings for further research. The approach allowed for greater interaction with a geographically and demographically diverse pool of participants, many of whom are time poor and would ordinarily be unwilling or unable to participate. In this article, we report the differences between implementing online focus groups and face-to-face focus groups and examine the difficulties and uncertainties, in particular relating to entry to sessions and drop-out rates. Online focus groups were found to be a viable, flexible and convenient method for engaging with an energy company’s current customer base in the comfort of their own home.
Energy, Marketing, Online focus groups, Personality
Turner, Philip
772d9dd5-829d-4e40-83a2-f8ea70ee2b14
Rushby, Tom
bdb7715f-0331-491c-a9dd-5835f30b0bf8
Gauthier, Stephanie
4e7702f7-e1a9-4732-8430-fabbed0f56ed
James, Patrick
da0be14a-aa63-46a7-8646-a37f9a02a71b
Bahaj, Abubakr
a64074cc-2b6e-43df-adac-a8437e7f1b37
Aragon, Victoria
f2a397a1-9d24-4f68-8f22-cc3270761d82
Sweetnam, Trevor
d4e9ee0f-6aa7-4d78-a410-5b1cd85bd9ab
Ellis, Duncan
7f99935d-6ef9-4b26-a234-f1cc5e13c778
24 August 2021
Turner, Philip
772d9dd5-829d-4e40-83a2-f8ea70ee2b14
Rushby, Tom
bdb7715f-0331-491c-a9dd-5835f30b0bf8
Gauthier, Stephanie
4e7702f7-e1a9-4732-8430-fabbed0f56ed
James, Patrick
da0be14a-aa63-46a7-8646-a37f9a02a71b
Bahaj, Abubakr
a64074cc-2b6e-43df-adac-a8437e7f1b37
Aragon, Victoria
f2a397a1-9d24-4f68-8f22-cc3270761d82
Sweetnam, Trevor
d4e9ee0f-6aa7-4d78-a410-5b1cd85bd9ab
Ellis, Duncan
7f99935d-6ef9-4b26-a234-f1cc5e13c778
Turner, Philip, Rushby, Tom, Gauthier, Stephanie, James, Patrick, Bahaj, Abubakr, Aragon, Victoria, Sweetnam, Trevor and Ellis, Duncan
(2021)
An Online ‘Face to Face’ Focus Group Approach for Understanding How Household Energy Use and Green Investment Decisions Differ by Personality Traits.
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20.
(doi:10.1177/16094069211038312).
Abstract
In a UK context, encouraging the uptake of energy efficiency measures at the household level is an ongoing challenge of ever-increasing importance. A combination of economic and psychological factors influence green investment decisions and so this study aims to determine whether online focus groups are a viable means of interacting and evaluating the effectiveness of personality tailored marketing strategies. Here, we present the learnings from over 70 synchronous online focus groups undertaken with a UK energy provider’s household customers (N = 143) to test the effectiveness of two energy product propositions (smart thermostat and hybrid heat pump) through two channels of communication: video and discussion. The researchers examined and analysed the online engagement and focus group method, focusing on the customer feedback, appropriateness of the approach and how it works in practice, providing key learnings for further research. The approach allowed for greater interaction with a geographically and demographically diverse pool of participants, many of whom are time poor and would ordinarily be unwilling or unable to participate. In this article, we report the differences between implementing online focus groups and face-to-face focus groups and examine the difficulties and uncertainties, in particular relating to entry to sessions and drop-out rates. Online focus groups were found to be a viable, flexible and convenient method for engaging with an energy company’s current customer base in the comfort of their own home.
Text
16094069211038312
- Version of Record
More information
Published date: 24 August 2021
Keywords:
Energy, Marketing, Online focus groups, Personality
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453064
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453064
ISSN: 1609-4069
PURE UUID: c42ad7ae-500d-48a5-baa3-395e24e17cd5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 07 Jan 2022 17:51
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:55
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Philip Turner
Author:
Tom Rushby
Author:
Trevor Sweetnam
Author:
Duncan Ellis
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics