The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

PROState pathway embedded comparative trial: the IP3-PROSPECT study

PROState pathway embedded comparative trial: the IP3-PROSPECT study
PROState pathway embedded comparative trial: the IP3-PROSPECT study

INTRODUCTION: The traditional double blind RCT is the 'gold standard' trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) trial design may represent an alternative approach to delivering robust comparative data in prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: IP3-PROSPECT is a cmRCT designed to test multiple prostate cancer interventions from eligible men in one cohort. Key to the design is two points of consent. First, at point of consent one, men referred for prostate cancer investigations are invited to join the cohort. They may then be randomly invited at a later date to consider an intervention at point of consent two. In the pilot phase we will test the acceptability and feasibility of developing the cohort.

RESULTS: Acceptability and feasibility of the study will be measured by a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The primary outcome measure is the rate of consent to inclusion to the IP3-PROSPECT cohort. Secondary outcome measures include the completeness of data collection at sites and return rates of patient questionnaires. We will also interview patients and healthcare professionals to explore their thoughts on the implementation, practicality and efficiency of IP3-PROSPECT.

CONCLUSION: The IP3-PROSPECT study will evaluate the cmRCT design in prostate cancer. Initially we will pilot the design, assessing for acceptability and feasibility. The cmRCT is an innovative design that offers potential for building a modern comparative evidence base for prostate cancer.

Clinical trials, Cohort multiple randomised controlled trial, Prostate cancer, cmRCT
1551-7144
Bass, E J
c314db35-31b5-4180-b8e0-a72b94e1a8f3
Klimowska-Nassar, N
3f43d195-d42a-4e7c-8c88-8c30879eb25f
Sasikaran, T
2b0e6f6b-915b-468f-833f-2e0159ac09b7
Day, E
b15ac4a7-e8c5-40f6-b6ad-51fcf13ec056
Fiorentino, F
e7bed6cb-dccf-437d-b58d-844bfc4e280a
Sydes, M R
74f846e5-4690-452a-b0d8-5ca43c02dfa4
Winkler, M
e6716c20-4946-4466-bf05-76551c97e817
Arumainayagam, N
18edffe6-b0fd-48e8-bc8b-a2c3f24171da
Khoubehi, B
8a8f2f2d-f227-41b8-9f9b-c75add4e62e9
Pope, A
085de5de-251b-445f-849e-bae46a885004
Sokhi, H
bbfcc804-91bb-44f8-a2c2-e5a2257be148
Dudderidge, T
dae51cb9-9192-4352-9d7e-c7b2fcc4031a
Ahmed, H U
7b734f18-b6ca-4b08-9c15-8570a2b4e4d1
Bass, E J
c314db35-31b5-4180-b8e0-a72b94e1a8f3
Klimowska-Nassar, N
3f43d195-d42a-4e7c-8c88-8c30879eb25f
Sasikaran, T
2b0e6f6b-915b-468f-833f-2e0159ac09b7
Day, E
b15ac4a7-e8c5-40f6-b6ad-51fcf13ec056
Fiorentino, F
e7bed6cb-dccf-437d-b58d-844bfc4e280a
Sydes, M R
74f846e5-4690-452a-b0d8-5ca43c02dfa4
Winkler, M
e6716c20-4946-4466-bf05-76551c97e817
Arumainayagam, N
18edffe6-b0fd-48e8-bc8b-a2c3f24171da
Khoubehi, B
8a8f2f2d-f227-41b8-9f9b-c75add4e62e9
Pope, A
085de5de-251b-445f-849e-bae46a885004
Sokhi, H
bbfcc804-91bb-44f8-a2c2-e5a2257be148
Dudderidge, T
dae51cb9-9192-4352-9d7e-c7b2fcc4031a
Ahmed, H U
7b734f18-b6ca-4b08-9c15-8570a2b4e4d1

Bass, E J, Klimowska-Nassar, N, Sasikaran, T, Day, E, Fiorentino, F, Sydes, M R, Winkler, M, Arumainayagam, N, Khoubehi, B, Pope, A, Sokhi, H, Dudderidge, T and Ahmed, H U (2021) PROState pathway embedded comparative trial: the IP3-PROSPECT study. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 107, [106485]. (doi:10.1016/j.cct.2021.106485).

Record type: Article

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The traditional double blind RCT is the 'gold standard' trial design. For a variety of reasons, these designs often fail to accrue enough participants to conclude. This is particularly challenging in localized prostate cancer. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) trial design may represent an alternative approach to delivering robust comparative data in prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: IP3-PROSPECT is a cmRCT designed to test multiple prostate cancer interventions from eligible men in one cohort. Key to the design is two points of consent. First, at point of consent one, men referred for prostate cancer investigations are invited to join the cohort. They may then be randomly invited at a later date to consider an intervention at point of consent two. In the pilot phase we will test the acceptability and feasibility of developing the cohort.

RESULTS: Acceptability and feasibility of the study will be measured by a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The primary outcome measure is the rate of consent to inclusion to the IP3-PROSPECT cohort. Secondary outcome measures include the completeness of data collection at sites and return rates of patient questionnaires. We will also interview patients and healthcare professionals to explore their thoughts on the implementation, practicality and efficiency of IP3-PROSPECT.

CONCLUSION: The IP3-PROSPECT study will evaluate the cmRCT design in prostate cancer. Initially we will pilot the design, assessing for acceptability and feasibility. The cmRCT is an innovative design that offers potential for building a modern comparative evidence base for prostate cancer.

Text
1-s2.0-S1551714421002214-main - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 10 June 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 15 June 2021
Published date: 1 August 2021
Keywords: Clinical trials, Cohort multiple randomised controlled trial, Prostate cancer, cmRCT

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 453410
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453410
ISSN: 1551-7144
PURE UUID: 5ed2ad13-9242-4b9b-9ced-3e9950d223d1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Jan 2022 18:24
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 14:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: E J Bass
Author: N Klimowska-Nassar
Author: T Sasikaran
Author: E Day
Author: F Fiorentino
Author: M R Sydes
Author: M Winkler
Author: N Arumainayagam
Author: B Khoubehi
Author: A Pope
Author: H Sokhi
Author: T Dudderidge
Author: H U Ahmed

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×