A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants
A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a common phenomenon experienced in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units, as well as being a focus of many research studies into feeding methods, particularly in relation to comorbidities. There is no widely accepted definition of FI. This systematic review aimed to explore the range of definitions used for FI and provide an estimate of the prevalence amongst preterm infants.
METHODS: Searches were completed on MEDLINE (includes the Cochrane library), Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, NHS Evidence and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria; preterm infants in neonatal units, a clear definition of FI, >10 patients and be available in English language. Case reports were excluded.
RESULTS: One hundred studies were included. Definitions of FI were inconsistent. Studies were grouped according to definition used into: Group A - measuring gastric residual volume (GRV) only; group B - GRV and abdominal distension (AD); group C - GRV, AD and gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) which included any of vomiting, bilious vomiting and blood in stool; group D- GRV and GI; group E - AD and GI; group F - GI only and group G - any other elements used. Meta-analysis demonstrated that prevalence of FI between groups varied from 15 to 30% with an overall prevalence of 27% (95% confidence interval 23-31%). Group A had the highest prevalence. Review of time to full enteral feed was performed (37 studies) which demonstrated a range of 11.3-18.3 days depending on which FI definition used.
DISCUSSION: Definitions of FI in research are inconsistent, a similar finding to that seen in studies in both paediatric and adult critical care populations. The difficulty of defining FI in the preterm population is the concern regarding necrotising enterocolitis, with some studies using an overlap in their definitions, despite differing pathophysiology and management. Due to the heterogeneity of data obtained in this review regarding definitions used, further robust research is required in order to conclude which elements which should be used to define FI in this population.
PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42019155596. Registered November 2019.
Feeding intolerance, Neonatal intensive care, Preterm infants, Systematic review
5576-5586
Weeks, Charlotte L
5d72919b-617c-4a93-9f31-b2d7d404b99d
Marino, Luise V
c479400f-9424-4879-9ca6-d81e6351de26
Johnson, Mark J
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed
November 2021
Weeks, Charlotte L
5d72919b-617c-4a93-9f31-b2d7d404b99d
Marino, Luise V
c479400f-9424-4879-9ca6-d81e6351de26
Johnson, Mark J
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed
Weeks, Charlotte L, Marino, Luise V and Johnson, Mark J
(2021)
A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants.
Clinical Nutrition, 40 (11), .
(doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.010).
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a common phenomenon experienced in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units, as well as being a focus of many research studies into feeding methods, particularly in relation to comorbidities. There is no widely accepted definition of FI. This systematic review aimed to explore the range of definitions used for FI and provide an estimate of the prevalence amongst preterm infants.
METHODS: Searches were completed on MEDLINE (includes the Cochrane library), Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, NHS Evidence and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria; preterm infants in neonatal units, a clear definition of FI, >10 patients and be available in English language. Case reports were excluded.
RESULTS: One hundred studies were included. Definitions of FI were inconsistent. Studies were grouped according to definition used into: Group A - measuring gastric residual volume (GRV) only; group B - GRV and abdominal distension (AD); group C - GRV, AD and gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) which included any of vomiting, bilious vomiting and blood in stool; group D- GRV and GI; group E - AD and GI; group F - GI only and group G - any other elements used. Meta-analysis demonstrated that prevalence of FI between groups varied from 15 to 30% with an overall prevalence of 27% (95% confidence interval 23-31%). Group A had the highest prevalence. Review of time to full enteral feed was performed (37 studies) which demonstrated a range of 11.3-18.3 days depending on which FI definition used.
DISCUSSION: Definitions of FI in research are inconsistent, a similar finding to that seen in studies in both paediatric and adult critical care populations. The difficulty of defining FI in the preterm population is the concern regarding necrotising enterocolitis, with some studies using an overlap in their definitions, despite differing pathophysiology and management. Due to the heterogeneity of data obtained in this review regarding definitions used, further robust research is required in order to conclude which elements which should be used to define FI in this population.
PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42019155596. Registered November 2019.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 7 September 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 September 2021
Published date: November 2021
Additional Information:
Funding Information:
MJJ is supported by the National Institute for Health Research through the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre. LVM is supported by the Southampton Academy of Research.
Keywords:
Feeding intolerance, Neonatal intensive care, Preterm infants, Systematic review
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453471
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453471
ISSN: 0261-5614
PURE UUID: 96f7db7d-f18f-4850-970a-c754adcff868
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 18 Jan 2022 17:36
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:52
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Charlotte L Weeks
Author:
Luise V Marino
Author:
Mark J Johnson
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics