The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants

A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants
A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a common phenomenon experienced in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units, as well as being a focus of many research studies into feeding methods, particularly in relation to comorbidities. There is no widely accepted definition of FI. This systematic review aimed to explore the range of definitions used for FI and provide an estimate of the prevalence amongst preterm infants.

METHODS: Searches were completed on MEDLINE (includes the Cochrane library), Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, NHS Evidence and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria; preterm infants in neonatal units, a clear definition of FI, >10 patients and be available in English language. Case reports were excluded.

RESULTS: One hundred studies were included. Definitions of FI were inconsistent. Studies were grouped according to definition used into: Group A - measuring gastric residual volume (GRV) only; group B - GRV and abdominal distension (AD); group C - GRV, AD and gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) which included any of vomiting, bilious vomiting and blood in stool; group D- GRV and GI; group E - AD and GI; group F - GI only and group G - any other elements used. Meta-analysis demonstrated that prevalence of FI between groups varied from 15 to 30% with an overall prevalence of 27% (95% confidence interval 23-31%). Group A had the highest prevalence. Review of time to full enteral feed was performed (37 studies) which demonstrated a range of 11.3-18.3 days depending on which FI definition used.

DISCUSSION: Definitions of FI in research are inconsistent, a similar finding to that seen in studies in both paediatric and adult critical care populations. The difficulty of defining FI in the preterm population is the concern regarding necrotising enterocolitis, with some studies using an overlap in their definitions, despite differing pathophysiology and management. Due to the heterogeneity of data obtained in this review regarding definitions used, further robust research is required in order to conclude which elements which should be used to define FI in this population.

PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42019155596. Registered November 2019.

Feeding intolerance, Neonatal intensive care, Preterm infants, Systematic review
0261-5614
5576-5586
Weeks, Charlotte L
5d72919b-617c-4a93-9f31-b2d7d404b99d
Marino, Luise V
c479400f-9424-4879-9ca6-d81e6351de26
Johnson, Mark J
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed
Weeks, Charlotte L
5d72919b-617c-4a93-9f31-b2d7d404b99d
Marino, Luise V
c479400f-9424-4879-9ca6-d81e6351de26
Johnson, Mark J
ce07b5dd-b12b-47df-a5df-cd3b9447c9ed

Weeks, Charlotte L, Marino, Luise V and Johnson, Mark J (2021) A systematic review of the definitions and prevalence of feeding intolerance in preterm infants. Clinical Nutrition, 40 (11), 5576-5586. (doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.010).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a common phenomenon experienced in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units, as well as being a focus of many research studies into feeding methods, particularly in relation to comorbidities. There is no widely accepted definition of FI. This systematic review aimed to explore the range of definitions used for FI and provide an estimate of the prevalence amongst preterm infants.

METHODS: Searches were completed on MEDLINE (includes the Cochrane library), Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, NHS Evidence and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria; preterm infants in neonatal units, a clear definition of FI, >10 patients and be available in English language. Case reports were excluded.

RESULTS: One hundred studies were included. Definitions of FI were inconsistent. Studies were grouped according to definition used into: Group A - measuring gastric residual volume (GRV) only; group B - GRV and abdominal distension (AD); group C - GRV, AD and gastrointestinal symptoms (GI) which included any of vomiting, bilious vomiting and blood in stool; group D- GRV and GI; group E - AD and GI; group F - GI only and group G - any other elements used. Meta-analysis demonstrated that prevalence of FI between groups varied from 15 to 30% with an overall prevalence of 27% (95% confidence interval 23-31%). Group A had the highest prevalence. Review of time to full enteral feed was performed (37 studies) which demonstrated a range of 11.3-18.3 days depending on which FI definition used.

DISCUSSION: Definitions of FI in research are inconsistent, a similar finding to that seen in studies in both paediatric and adult critical care populations. The difficulty of defining FI in the preterm population is the concern regarding necrotising enterocolitis, with some studies using an overlap in their definitions, despite differing pathophysiology and management. Due to the heterogeneity of data obtained in this review regarding definitions used, further robust research is required in order to conclude which elements which should be used to define FI in this population.

PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42019155596. Registered November 2019.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 7 September 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 17 September 2021
Published date: November 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: MJJ is supported by the National Institute for Health Research through the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre. LVM is supported by the Southampton Academy of Research.
Keywords: Feeding intolerance, Neonatal intensive care, Preterm infants, Systematic review

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 453471
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453471
ISSN: 0261-5614
PURE UUID: 96f7db7d-f18f-4850-970a-c754adcff868
ORCID for Mark J Johnson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1829-9912

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jan 2022 17:36
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 03:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Charlotte L Weeks
Author: Luise V Marino
Author: Mark J Johnson ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×