The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Hay vs haylage: Forage type influences the equine urinary metabonome and faecal microbiota

Hay vs haylage: Forage type influences the equine urinary metabonome and faecal microbiota
Hay vs haylage: Forage type influences the equine urinary metabonome and faecal microbiota
Background: Gut microbial communities are increasingly being linked to diseases in animals and humans. Obesity and its associated diseases are a concern for horse owners and veterinarians, and there is a growing interest in the link among diet, the intestinal microbiota and metabolic disease.

Objectives: Assess the influence of long-term hay or haylage feeding on the microbiota and metabolomes of 20 Welsh mountain ponies. Study design: Longitudinal study.

Methods: Urine, faeces and blood were collected from 20 ponies on a monthly basis over a 13-month period. Urine and faeces were analysed using proton magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy and faecal bacterial DNA underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Results: Faecal bacterial community profiles were observed to be different for the two groups, with discriminant analysis identifying 102 bacterial groups (or operational taxonomic units, OTUs) that differed in relative abundance in accordance with forage type. Urinary metabolic profiles of the hay- and haylage-fed ponies were significantly different during 12 of the 13 mo of the study. Notably, the urinary excretion of hippurate was greater in the hay-fed ponies for the duration of the study, while ethyl-glucoside excretion was higher in the haylage-fed ponies.

Main limitations: The study was undertaken over a 13-month period and both groups of ponies had access to pasture during the summer months.

Conclusions: The data generated from this study suggest that the choice of forage may have implications for the intestinal microbiota and metabolism of ponies and, therefore, potentially their health status. Understanding the potential implication of feeding a particular type of forage will enable horse owners to make more informed choices with regard to feed, especially if their horse or pony is prone to weight gain.
forage, hay, haylage, horse, metabonomics, microbiota
0425-1644
Leng, Joy
d9621c16-d2a1-47c5-8f76-297e41da470d
McNally, Susan
8cd667ac-ff4f-4856-a0d8-247c0deeb1c9
Walton, Gemma
a167f493-b3bf-4063-acdf-acdfa8c1137c
Swann, Jonathan
7c11a66b-f4b8-4dbf-aa17-ad8b0561b85c
Proudman, Chris
928f1206-7870-48a7-aabf-1922e3343947
Argo, Caroline
0275e174-3e33-4395-8849-e8eba9187864
Emery, Sue
366f981e-c9f2-4ee6-a384-e9b3e51a7efa
La Ragione, Roberto
1e10ae5d-7750-4ace-a55b-1f606300664e
Eustace, Robert
0dce8e6c-9353-43e6-9ea9-4fd951862e87
Leng, Joy
d9621c16-d2a1-47c5-8f76-297e41da470d
McNally, Susan
8cd667ac-ff4f-4856-a0d8-247c0deeb1c9
Walton, Gemma
a167f493-b3bf-4063-acdf-acdfa8c1137c
Swann, Jonathan
7c11a66b-f4b8-4dbf-aa17-ad8b0561b85c
Proudman, Chris
928f1206-7870-48a7-aabf-1922e3343947
Argo, Caroline
0275e174-3e33-4395-8849-e8eba9187864
Emery, Sue
366f981e-c9f2-4ee6-a384-e9b3e51a7efa
La Ragione, Roberto
1e10ae5d-7750-4ace-a55b-1f606300664e
Eustace, Robert
0dce8e6c-9353-43e6-9ea9-4fd951862e87

Leng, Joy, McNally, Susan, Walton, Gemma, Swann, Jonathan, Proudman, Chris, Argo, Caroline, Emery, Sue, La Ragione, Roberto and Eustace, Robert (2021) Hay vs haylage: Forage type influences the equine urinary metabonome and faecal microbiota. Equine Veterinary Journal. (doi:10.1111/evj.13456).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Gut microbial communities are increasingly being linked to diseases in animals and humans. Obesity and its associated diseases are a concern for horse owners and veterinarians, and there is a growing interest in the link among diet, the intestinal microbiota and metabolic disease.

Objectives: Assess the influence of long-term hay or haylage feeding on the microbiota and metabolomes of 20 Welsh mountain ponies. Study design: Longitudinal study.

Methods: Urine, faeces and blood were collected from 20 ponies on a monthly basis over a 13-month period. Urine and faeces were analysed using proton magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy and faecal bacterial DNA underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Results: Faecal bacterial community profiles were observed to be different for the two groups, with discriminant analysis identifying 102 bacterial groups (or operational taxonomic units, OTUs) that differed in relative abundance in accordance with forage type. Urinary metabolic profiles of the hay- and haylage-fed ponies were significantly different during 12 of the 13 mo of the study. Notably, the urinary excretion of hippurate was greater in the hay-fed ponies for the duration of the study, while ethyl-glucoside excretion was higher in the haylage-fed ponies.

Main limitations: The study was undertaken over a 13-month period and both groups of ponies had access to pasture during the summer months.

Conclusions: The data generated from this study suggest that the choice of forage may have implications for the intestinal microbiota and metabolism of ponies and, therefore, potentially their health status. Understanding the potential implication of feeding a particular type of forage will enable horse owners to make more informed choices with regard to feed, especially if their horse or pony is prone to weight gain.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2021
e-pub ahead of print date: 26 April 2021
Published date: 26 April 2021
Additional Information: Funding Information: This study was funded by The Laminitis Trust (grant number – 35687) via a grant awarded by Equi Life Ltd (grant number – RN0279) to the University of Surrey, University of Reading and Imperial College, University of London. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 EVJ Ltd Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords: forage, hay, haylage, horse, metabonomics, microbiota

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 453502
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453502
ISSN: 0425-1644
PURE UUID: c8c763b9-da1d-4a12-946d-0ffcee4098c0
ORCID for Jonathan Swann: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6485-4529

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 18 Jan 2022 17:54
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Joy Leng
Author: Susan McNally
Author: Gemma Walton
Author: Jonathan Swann ORCID iD
Author: Chris Proudman
Author: Caroline Argo
Author: Sue Emery
Author: Roberto La Ragione
Author: Robert Eustace

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×