Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport
Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport
Concerns over women's safety on public transport systems are commonly reported in the media. We develop statistical models to test for gender differences in the perception of safety and satisfaction on urban metros and buses by using large-scale unique customer satisfaction data for 28 world cities over the period 2009–2018. Results indicate a significant gender gap in the perception of safety, with women being 10% more likely than men to feel unsafe in metros (6% for buses). This gender gap is larger for safety than for overall satisfaction (3% in metros and 2.5% in buses), which is consistent with safety being one dimension of overall satisfaction. Results are stable across specifications and robust to inclusion of city level and time controls. We find heterogeneous responses by sociodemographic characteristics. Data indicate that 45% of women feel secure in trains and metro stations (and 55% in buses). Thus the gender gap encompasses more differences in transport perception between men and women rather than an intrinsic network fear. Additional models test for the influence of metro characteristics on perceived safety levels and find that more acts of violence, larger carriages and emptier vehicles decrease women's feeling of safety.
Behavioural responses, Buses, Customer satisfaction, Gender, Metros, Public transport, Safety
737-769
Ouali, Laila Ait Bihi
7b10e1b1-25e7-4629-b96e-d5bf8de362a7
Graham, Daniel J.
8518a1e4-74ce-47f2-8ed3-4f63720c6807
Barron, Alexander
5967dd1c-07d3-4c02-bb43-bdf86c9de2a4
Trompet, Mark
1a0886a8-29d9-41e5-bc83-c5c547ab6b72
1 June 2020
Ouali, Laila Ait Bihi
7b10e1b1-25e7-4629-b96e-d5bf8de362a7
Graham, Daniel J.
8518a1e4-74ce-47f2-8ed3-4f63720c6807
Barron, Alexander
5967dd1c-07d3-4c02-bb43-bdf86c9de2a4
Trompet, Mark
1a0886a8-29d9-41e5-bc83-c5c547ab6b72
Ouali, Laila Ait Bihi, Graham, Daniel J., Barron, Alexander and Trompet, Mark
(2020)
Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 183 (3), .
(doi:10.1111/rssa.12558).
Abstract
Concerns over women's safety on public transport systems are commonly reported in the media. We develop statistical models to test for gender differences in the perception of safety and satisfaction on urban metros and buses by using large-scale unique customer satisfaction data for 28 world cities over the period 2009–2018. Results indicate a significant gender gap in the perception of safety, with women being 10% more likely than men to feel unsafe in metros (6% for buses). This gender gap is larger for safety than for overall satisfaction (3% in metros and 2.5% in buses), which is consistent with safety being one dimension of overall satisfaction. Results are stable across specifications and robust to inclusion of city level and time controls. We find heterogeneous responses by sociodemographic characteristics. Data indicate that 45% of women feel secure in trains and metro stations (and 55% in buses). Thus the gender gap encompasses more differences in transport perception between men and women rather than an intrinsic network fear. Additional models test for the influence of metro characteristics on perceived safety levels and find that more acts of violence, larger carriages and emptier vehicles decrease women's feeling of safety.
Text
Royal Stats Society Series A - 2020 - Ouali - Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 1 June 2020
Additional Information:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Royal Statistical Society
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Behavioural responses, Buses, Customer satisfaction, Gender, Metros, Public transport, Safety
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453534
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453534
ISSN: 0964-1998
PURE UUID: 369400d2-a9a3-4682-b898-3013422636c7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 19 Jan 2022 17:38
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 14:50
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Daniel J. Graham
Author:
Alexander Barron
Author:
Mark Trompet
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics