An experimental investigation of the impact of critical and warm comments on state paranoia in a non-clinical sample
An experimental investigation of the impact of critical and warm comments on state paranoia in a non-clinical sample
Background and objectives: Interpersonal stress is key to the development and maintenance of paranoia. Much attention has been given to the impact of interpersonal stressors, such as criticism, on outcomes in psychosis. Less attention has been given to the potentially protective effects of positive interpersonal factors. This study tested experimentally whether criticism and warm comments elicited changes in state paranoia. Whether warm comments provided protective effects when participants faced subsequent social exclusion was also examined. Method: A nonclinical sample (N = 97) was randomised to criticism, warm comments, or neutral comments conditions. Participants then played a virtual ball game (Cyberball), during which they were systematically excluded from the game. State paranoia was measured before and after the affective stimuli and after social exclusion. Self-esteem and trait paranoia were also measured. Results: Paranoia levels increased following exposure to criticism (p =.011). Paranoia was not significantly lower following exposure to warm comments (p =.203). Warm comments did not provide protection against the effects of subsequent social exclusion. The warm comments condition was the only condition in which significant increases in paranoia were seen following social exclusion (p =.004). Limitations: Use of a non-clinical sample limits generalisation to clinical populations. Conclusions: Criticism is sufficient to elicit increases in paranoia in non-clinical participants. Warm comments are insufficient to significantly reduce paranoia or provide protective effects against subsequent negative interpersonal experiences, highlighting the need to balance therapeutic warmth with amelioration of social stressors in paranoia.
30-37
Butler, Rebecca
4cdc3772-9897-4a9b-9f27-168a0335a000
Berry, Katherine
1e65711e-8c6b-483f-8db2-ec9358d2971d
Ellett, Lyn
96482ea6-04b6-4a50-a7ec-ae0a3abc20ca
Bucci, Sandra
374987a4-e7d8-473e-927e-3ad05a27d1e3
March 2019
Butler, Rebecca
4cdc3772-9897-4a9b-9f27-168a0335a000
Berry, Katherine
1e65711e-8c6b-483f-8db2-ec9358d2971d
Ellett, Lyn
96482ea6-04b6-4a50-a7ec-ae0a3abc20ca
Bucci, Sandra
374987a4-e7d8-473e-927e-3ad05a27d1e3
Butler, Rebecca, Berry, Katherine, Ellett, Lyn and Bucci, Sandra
(2019)
An experimental investigation of the impact of critical and warm comments on state paranoia in a non-clinical sample.
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 62, .
(doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.08.008).
Abstract
Background and objectives: Interpersonal stress is key to the development and maintenance of paranoia. Much attention has been given to the impact of interpersonal stressors, such as criticism, on outcomes in psychosis. Less attention has been given to the potentially protective effects of positive interpersonal factors. This study tested experimentally whether criticism and warm comments elicited changes in state paranoia. Whether warm comments provided protective effects when participants faced subsequent social exclusion was also examined. Method: A nonclinical sample (N = 97) was randomised to criticism, warm comments, or neutral comments conditions. Participants then played a virtual ball game (Cyberball), during which they were systematically excluded from the game. State paranoia was measured before and after the affective stimuli and after social exclusion. Self-esteem and trait paranoia were also measured. Results: Paranoia levels increased following exposure to criticism (p =.011). Paranoia was not significantly lower following exposure to warm comments (p =.203). Warm comments did not provide protection against the effects of subsequent social exclusion. The warm comments condition was the only condition in which significant increases in paranoia were seen following social exclusion (p =.004). Limitations: Use of a non-clinical sample limits generalisation to clinical populations. Conclusions: Criticism is sufficient to elicit increases in paranoia in non-clinical participants. Warm comments are insufficient to significantly reduce paranoia or provide protective effects against subsequent negative interpersonal experiences, highlighting the need to balance therapeutic warmth with amelioration of social stressors in paranoia.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: March 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453588
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453588
ISSN: 0005-7916
PURE UUID: b039eb3b-dea6-4b58-bdf8-d5b92bc2e9bc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jan 2022 17:33
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:10
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Rebecca Butler
Author:
Katherine Berry
Author:
Sandra Bucci
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics