Between realism and constructivism: A sketch of pluralism for science education
Between realism and constructivism: A sketch of pluralism for science education
This chapter provides a case for using ideas developed by Integrated History and Philosophy of Science (iHPS) scholars to examine some implications for a closely related area, namely science education. It presents a re-examination of the epistemological basis of science education, using the ideas of one very actively discussed topic among iHPS scholars, namely scientific pluralism. The chapter examines the arguments for pluralism proposed by education theorists and philosophers of science and considers pluralistic realism as one possible way out of the dilemma posed between the realist and constructivist extremes. It also presents more practical implications of pluralism in science education by suggesting several potential characteristics of what might be considered ‘pluralist’ science education. In the pluralistic understanding of science, the importance of teaching the methods of science is still recognised. Both in science studies and science education, constructivism is one of the most influential ideas that has prevailed from the second half of the twentieth century onward.
228-247
Park, Wonyong
eae3796e-fc99-43ba-98be-53ea5bdb14fc
Song, Jinwoong
f29b2117-5711-4a0a-b607-b8a1921f44fc
14 May 2019
Park, Wonyong
eae3796e-fc99-43ba-98be-53ea5bdb14fc
Song, Jinwoong
f29b2117-5711-4a0a-b607-b8a1921f44fc
Park, Wonyong and Song, Jinwoong
(2019)
Between realism and constructivism: A sketch of pluralism for science education.
In,
Herring, Emily, Jones, Kevin, Kiprijanov, Konstantin and Sellers, Laura
(eds.)
The Past, Present, and Future of Integrated History and Philosophy of Science.
New York, NY.
Routledge, .
(doi:10.4324/9781351214827-14).
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This chapter provides a case for using ideas developed by Integrated History and Philosophy of Science (iHPS) scholars to examine some implications for a closely related area, namely science education. It presents a re-examination of the epistemological basis of science education, using the ideas of one very actively discussed topic among iHPS scholars, namely scientific pluralism. The chapter examines the arguments for pluralism proposed by education theorists and philosophers of science and considers pluralistic realism as one possible way out of the dilemma posed between the realist and constructivist extremes. It also presents more practical implications of pluralism in science education by suggesting several potential characteristics of what might be considered ‘pluralist’ science education. In the pluralistic understanding of science, the importance of teaching the methods of science is still recognised. Both in science studies and science education, constructivism is one of the most influential ideas that has prevailed from the second half of the twentieth century onward.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 14 May 2019
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 453602
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453602
PURE UUID: 362b4842-079a-4fc3-be70-9e40f5ebd8c1
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Jan 2022 17:35
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:09
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Wonyong Park
Author:
Jinwoong Song
Editor:
Emily Herring
Editor:
Kevin Jones
Editor:
Konstantin Kiprijanov
Editor:
Laura Sellers
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics