The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The estimation of union wage differentials and the impact of methodological choices

The estimation of union wage differentials and the impact of methodological choices
The estimation of union wage differentials and the impact of methodological choices
This paper demonstrates that methodological differences can matter a lot in the estimation of union/non-union wage differentials. Using individual-level data from the 1991 Wave of the British Household Panel Survey and a model evolved from replicating six existing British studies, we find that the model specification adopted has an important impact on the estimated differential and that the choice of which group means to use when evaluating the mean differential in multi-equation models is of considerable importance. There are also important differences between membership and coverage differentials and the earnings measure used and sample selected also make a difference. However, apart from firm size, the contents of the control vector used is not found to be of great importance.
0927-5371
449-474
Swaffield, Jo
9e0d6fe1-3219-4d1c-8cff-52c7fac1568f
Stewart, Mark
94835629-75dd-4de4-96c5-23ff1634bc42
Upward, Richard
12b2e650-b92e-43b2-b020-5e478375452c
Andrews, Martyn
5b2ef81e-3f40-4fd3-9de0-d6a10ad01df4
Swaffield, Jo
9e0d6fe1-3219-4d1c-8cff-52c7fac1568f
Stewart, Mark
94835629-75dd-4de4-96c5-23ff1634bc42
Upward, Richard
12b2e650-b92e-43b2-b020-5e478375452c
Andrews, Martyn
5b2ef81e-3f40-4fd3-9de0-d6a10ad01df4

Swaffield, Jo, Stewart, Mark, Upward, Richard and Andrews, Martyn (1998) The estimation of union wage differentials and the impact of methodological choices. Labour Economics, 5 (4), 449-474. (doi:10.1016/S0927-5371(98)00010-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper demonstrates that methodological differences can matter a lot in the estimation of union/non-union wage differentials. Using individual-level data from the 1991 Wave of the British Household Panel Survey and a model evolved from replicating six existing British studies, we find that the model specification adopted has an important impact on the estimated differential and that the choice of which group means to use when evaluating the mean differential in multi-equation models is of considerable importance. There are also important differences between membership and coverage differentials and the earnings measure used and sample selected also make a difference. However, apart from firm size, the contents of the control vector used is not found to be of great importance.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1998

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 453674
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453674
ISSN: 0927-5371
PURE UUID: f1b29e9e-637f-4403-876d-8d8c2d0bd7f6
ORCID for Jo Swaffield: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9157-6691

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Jan 2022 17:45
Last modified: 17 Mar 2024 04:09

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jo Swaffield ORCID iD
Author: Mark Stewart
Author: Richard Upward
Author: Martyn Andrews

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×