The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A proof-of-concept framework for the preference elicitation and evaluation of health informatics technologies: The online PRESENT patient experience dashboard as a case example

A proof-of-concept framework for the preference elicitation and evaluation of health informatics technologies: The online PRESENT patient experience dashboard as a case example
A proof-of-concept framework for the preference elicitation and evaluation of health informatics technologies: The online PRESENT patient experience dashboard as a case example

Background: Constrained budgets within healthcare systems and the need to efficiently allocate resources often necessitate the valuation of healthcare interventions and services. However, when a technological product is developed for which no market exists it is a challenge to understand how to place the product and which specifications are the most sought after and important for end users. This was the case for a dashboard we developed, displaying analyses of patient experience survey free-text comments. Method: We describe a customisation and evaluation process for our online dashboard that addresses this challenge, using a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We were not interested in the exact content of the dashboard, which was determined in previous stages of our larger study, but on the availability of features and customization options and how they affect individuals' purchasing behaviours. Results: Our DCE completion rate was 33/152 (22%). Certain features were highly desirable - the search function, filtering, and upload own data - and would contribute significant added value to the dashboard. Purchasing behaviour was dependent on the dashboard features, going from a 10 to 90% probability to purchase when we moved from a baseline to a fully-featured dashboard. The purchasing behaviour elicited in this study assumes individuals already have buy-in to the online dashboard, so we assessed only how the various features of our dashboard influence the probability of purchasing the product. Results were used to inform development of a generic checklist of desirable healthcare dashboard features as well as to refine the dashboard itself. Our study suggests the development of the online dashboard and its roll-out in the market would result in a positive net benefit in terms of utilities. The cost-benefit analysis offers a lower bound estimate of the net benefit as it does not acknowledge or incorporate non-monetary benefits that would result from the use of the online dashboard, such as from improved healthcare management. Conclusion: DCEs can be successfully used to inform development of an online dashboard by determining preferences for particular features and customisation options and how this affects individuals' purchasing behaviours. The process should be transferable to the development of other technologies.

Checklist, Cost-benefit analysis, DCE, Discrete choice experiment, Health informatics, Healthcare, Online dashboard, Ranking, Technology development, Willingness-to-pay
Mentzakis, Emmanouil
c0922185-18c7-49c2-a659-8ee6d89b5d74
Tkacz, Daria
b310bed6-9c76-4ca0-b7c6-2441c5e7c387
Rivas, Carol
040bfbc1-0aef-4826-ab58-e85743fea9d4
Mentzakis, Emmanouil
c0922185-18c7-49c2-a659-8ee6d89b5d74
Tkacz, Daria
b310bed6-9c76-4ca0-b7c6-2441c5e7c387
Rivas, Carol
040bfbc1-0aef-4826-ab58-e85743fea9d4

Mentzakis, Emmanouil, Tkacz, Daria and Rivas, Carol (2020) A proof-of-concept framework for the preference elicitation and evaluation of health informatics technologies: The online PRESENT patient experience dashboard as a case example. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20 (1), [95]. (doi:10.1186/s12911-020-1098-z).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Constrained budgets within healthcare systems and the need to efficiently allocate resources often necessitate the valuation of healthcare interventions and services. However, when a technological product is developed for which no market exists it is a challenge to understand how to place the product and which specifications are the most sought after and important for end users. This was the case for a dashboard we developed, displaying analyses of patient experience survey free-text comments. Method: We describe a customisation and evaluation process for our online dashboard that addresses this challenge, using a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We were not interested in the exact content of the dashboard, which was determined in previous stages of our larger study, but on the availability of features and customization options and how they affect individuals' purchasing behaviours. Results: Our DCE completion rate was 33/152 (22%). Certain features were highly desirable - the search function, filtering, and upload own data - and would contribute significant added value to the dashboard. Purchasing behaviour was dependent on the dashboard features, going from a 10 to 90% probability to purchase when we moved from a baseline to a fully-featured dashboard. The purchasing behaviour elicited in this study assumes individuals already have buy-in to the online dashboard, so we assessed only how the various features of our dashboard influence the probability of purchasing the product. Results were used to inform development of a generic checklist of desirable healthcare dashboard features as well as to refine the dashboard itself. Our study suggests the development of the online dashboard and its roll-out in the market would result in a positive net benefit in terms of utilities. The cost-benefit analysis offers a lower bound estimate of the net benefit as it does not acknowledge or incorporate non-monetary benefits that would result from the use of the online dashboard, such as from improved healthcare management. Conclusion: DCEs can be successfully used to inform development of an online dashboard by determining preferences for particular features and customisation options and how this affects individuals' purchasing behaviours. The process should be transferable to the development of other technologies.

Text
s12911-020-1098-z - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Published date: 24 May 2020
Additional Information: Funding Information: Research was undertaken in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration (http:// www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html). Ethics approval was obtained from an NHS National Research Ethics Committee (NRES 15/ NS/0104) and the study was sponsored by the University of Southampton. Full informed consent was obtained from all participants, online, before the questionnaire itself could be attempted. This included consent for publication of results; no personally identifiable data or quotes are used. Publisher Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s). Copyright: Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords: Checklist, Cost-benefit analysis, DCE, Discrete choice experiment, Health informatics, Healthcare, Online dashboard, Ranking, Technology development, Willingness-to-pay

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 453722
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/453722
PURE UUID: 5a9b10aa-5c3e-4be9-ae2c-9025fe820011
ORCID for Emmanouil Mentzakis: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1761-209X

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Jan 2022 17:39
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 03:21

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Daria Tkacz
Author: Carol Rivas

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×